Anarcho Libertarian blogs

Some  Anarcho-Syndicalism movements have taken this Union of Egoists as a literal basis for syndicalist communes while other  Queer Anarchism groups within Catalonia argued for Stirner's non-systematic approach.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

Fringe left

Anarcho Syndicalist /Left Rothnardian/ Mutual Aide

During this transition to our State Socialist (State Socialism with strong worker’s rights,  a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society there would be more expansive Mutual aide set up, more as safety nets due to the nature of this bumpy transitional path.

These Mutual aid participants would work together to find strategies and resources that would meet each other's needs (like food, housing, medical care, and disaster relief), while organizing themselves against the system that created the shortage in the first place. This would help distribute needed resources more efficiently. It is human nature to favor cooperation for survival and mutual aid. People need each other 

To mesh with an eventual stateless, classless and hierarchical society, these Mutual Aide groups would be egalitarian , non hierarchical and non bureaucratic structures, with members controlling all resources , sort of like a make shift participatory democracy, with equality of member status and power that would be shared leadership and would be consensus based decision making

use the second or third method, the next and final stage to lead to a State Socialist (State Socialism with strong worker’s rights,  a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society would be through Anarcho Syndicalism 

This type of Anarcho Syndicalism that would include some elements of worker radical syndicalism along with Laborism and moderately better social wages along with more hands on leadership councils who more directly help workers. It could interchangeably be called Anarcho Workerism (sometimes workers are in a war against their overlords so its understandable to see it from there side)

Basically it would be Autonomism which means in this stage we would force changes to the organization of capitalism independent of the state (whom we must fight against at all levels), trade unions and political parties through radical acts of rebellion (ie slow working, absenteeism-sabotage, socialization of the workplace and similar methods). 

This fiscal part of the work would be political, so that the worker himself/herself would force change without having to get political parties involved to do it for them. It would be anti systemic rebellion. This embodiment of this worker revolution would be an organic movement that is developed from a groundswell of awakened working class people and then the gradual transition toward the types of socialistic economies I support

To expand on this, we need more autonomous mass worker marches to show appreciation to our country's workers to make them want to help in our revolution. Maybe when workers of all race-ethnicities are united in a way that meshes with Autonomism, in their jobs and there is no more class conflict, this can happen

During this transitional stage, groups of businesses would work with the workers having greater profit through negotiations between unions and business groups, all of which would operate under a strongly extreme paternalistic anarchistic/socialist government (which would be commonplace in a Anarcho Syndicated transition to my State Socialist society) . Basically as a unique way for classes to collab/class co op to lead to an eventual classless society . 

During this Anarcho Syndicalist transition and after we get to a State Socialist (with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society , workers would get fuller/more control their places of employment which would make things like voluntary work from home easier to grasp for people not on board with it. This would be done through cooperative-diplomatic management of their industries. 

The goal would be to increase productivity. As long as those workers can guarantee this (or them being more reliable than Capitalism is 'reliable), then this would be set up for them. Basically self management (via individualism, autonomy and anti authoritianism), and even Republicans would be welcome to do this (and it is right up their ally since they always talk about small government and wanting more control of things, so them having more control of their work would be good for them).  Revolutionary spontaneity (alongside the Anarcho Syndicalism methods mentioned above to push forward to State Socialism) would be a way to make this a reality.   

Revolutionary spontaneity (alongside the Anarcho Syndicalism methods mentioned above to push forward to State Socialism) would be a way to make this a reality.   

Right Syndalicist https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fringe-left-3rd-position.html

Left Rothbardian  (also meshes with the fringe left blog theme of nazbol, 3P, strsserism since they are on nat soc spectrum and nat soca is about private property and seizing private property)

This transitional method would promote individual rights (including conditional and Left Rothbardian property rights) and be the only system based on the protection of those rights

In our eventual State Socialist (State Socialism with strong worker’s rights,  a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society, the state would own the means of production (by a worker's party and/or a state-planned economy) via an association of manufacturers and suppliers , in a mix of public and private means (basically Left Rothbardian means) and or with workers having genuine control over the means of production through institutions such as trade unions. during the transition to the workers seizing the means of production and phasing out Capitalism as mentioned above and below and ultimately abolishing classes and our monetary system

If that is the case, then in that type of post State Socialism with strong worker’s rights, a strong centralized state and economic collectivism and that is similar to European Socialism) society, I would want guilds and trade unions to be set up where they have influence by NGOs and Left Rothbardian ‘private’ agencies (post governmental) through indirect control that are aligned with critical liberalism. 

I believe that the government should give more freedom to private enterprise (in a Left Rothbardian way), and less intervention in private economies. I support more Left Rothbardian privatization

Monetary policies should be used to get rid of inflation along with temporarily bringing back the Gold Standard to help do so if we can’t move left on the economy

I favor privatization (Left Rothbardian privatization) as a way to remove state monopolies on various things along with awarding concessions.

I yield to condone this method to reign in a state socialist revolution because this fiscal accelerationism path to state socialism isn’t as bumpy other fiscal accelerationism paths since it is freedom of Economics and promotes individual rights (including conditional and Left Rothbardian property rights) and the only system based on the protection of those rights. 

I feel that property can only be legitimately owned by two means: direct trade from the past owner of that property to a new owner or the potential new owner applying the labor to unowned land. I use this idea to found its claim on the confiscation of the private property, in particular the part about applying the potential new owner’s labor to said unowned property (Applying it to 'ill gotten property') is legitimate leads to legitimate ownership of that property.

The difference between the Classic homesteading principle and this Neo Lockean principle is that the first means also accepts the Lockean proviso as legit, which states that the homesteading principle only applies so long as there is enough of and of the same quality for everybody else, while this Neo Lockean principle rejects this.

I heavily advocate for the respect of private property as a natural right which I derive from the right of self ownership. However I do not see property as legitimate if it is a derivative of coercion, including, if the property derives from state benefits.

I am against the idea that government regulation helps to eliminate or mitigate oppression by the big corporations since I believe the state is the source of the problem it says to solve.

I don’t agree with the view that the Gilded Age was a Laissez-Faire period where the state did not have interference and where the free markets ran the world. The Gilded Age was marked by huge state privilege to selected capital owners and corporations

These state benefits came in ways such as tax breaks, subsidies, or even direct monopolies on certain industries, even though there were certain big businesses at the time which didn't get privileges from the government.

I believe that these types of corporations which the state benefited with more or less largesse should be allowed to be seized by their workers (or third parties) to eliminate state benefits to companies

I support the seizure of "private" property through the homestead principle since that type of property is derived from theft (i.e subsidies funded by taxes) it thus is not legitimately owned, and thus the rightful owners are the ones who apply the labor to said illegitimate property. 

I feel that property that was previously stolen by the government legitimizes the seizure of this property. 

Like, if the state built a college with money from tax payers, applying my homesteading principle, the college is rightfully the property of those who had been stolen. However, since it's not easy to find out who the university is going to be given to (since it's not stolen from a precise individual), then I feel it's rightfully the property of the workers who by mixing their labor with the facilities have claimed this illegitimate property. 

We should consider though, that while they are to be rightfully property of those workers who applied their labor,  they are, to an extent, beneficiaries of the government. Thus the second group which can be selected for this ownership are the students themselves who lost their money paying for the maintainance of this ‘ill gotten’ property and the payment of the faculty.

This can be applied like for companies which have benefited from the robbery directly like colleges that get 2/3 of their income from the state. This would also legitimizes the seizure of those colleges by their workers, since a significant part of the benefit of that comes from stolen property. It’s only just that, still applying my homestead principle, the college is seized by the workers. This slow reduction of the state would eventually hopefully lead to a stateless society led by market forces and private property.

I believe that the government should give more freedom to private enterprise (in a Left Rothbardian way), and less intervention in private economies. I support more Left Rothbardian privatization

I favor privatization (Left Rothbardian privatization) as a way to remove state monopolies on various things along with awarding concessions. 

Parallel far left

Anarcho Libertarian

Anarcho Libertarian (Anarcho Libertarian Left Wing Free (freed) Marketist ie Left Wing Laissez Faire Kevin Carson and Ben Tucker, Anarcho Syndicalism , Agorist), Heathen Anarchism /Anarcho Collective Liberalism /Inclusive Democracy   Mutualism/Mutual Aide

Anarcho fusion of Libertarian Communism and Fourth Political Theory   https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/08/parallel-far-left-r-luxemburgism.html

Anarcho Libertarian Left Wing free market Anarchist   Left Wing Laissez Faire Kevin Carson and Ben Tucker, https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/parallel-far-left-blog-left-wing-left.html

Anarcho Synd https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/parallel-far-left-alt-left.html

I am not overtly anarchistic, but anarchism would be the formal category within which my Anarchism works. This is because I am committed to direct democracy, municipalism like I write in this blog and the eventual abolition of state, and by extension money and market economy  ID

The state adjacent or state would serve as a safeguard for the ownership and as the coordinator of production through a universal economic plan. Marxism Leninism

In this libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society (Inclusive Democracy) here is what I want

Inclusive Democracy/Heathen Anarchism

https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/parallel-far-left-alt-left.html

also alternative to SocDem  ie “Another distinguishing feature of ID is its distinction between basic and non-basic needs. Remuneration is according to need for basic needs, and according to effort for non-basic needs. ID is based on the principle that meeting basic needs is a fundamental human right which is guaranteed to all who are in a physical condition to offer a minimal amount of work. By contrast,Fotopoulos argues, Parecon follows the socialdemocratic rather than the anarcho-communist tradition and instead of proposing satisfaction according to need (as the ID project does) declares, first, that particular consumption needs such as health care or public parks will be free to all and, second, that as regards special needs, people will be able to make particular requests for need based consumption to be addressed case by case by others in the economy.[13] In fact, Michael Albert explicitly states that what he calls 'norm four', i.e. 'remuneration according to each person's need' should be applied only in exceptional cases of basic needs and not to all needs defined as such by the citizens' assemblies, as the Inclusive Democracy project declares. Thus, as Albert stresses: "beyond economic justice, we have our compassion, to be applied via norm four where appropriate such as in cases of illness, catastrophe, incapacity and so on".

I hate monopolies (i.e Big Tech, Nike, Walmart etc)      and also Marxist Leninism

Anarcho Collective Liberalism  (combine Collective Capitalism, Anarcho Capitalism w slight socialistic changes made to improve it from Socialist from Cap vs Soc redditer) 

Hopefully this would lead the point where this Mythological Socialist society (including elements of Free Market Libertarianism based on a model of proprietary communitarianism) collapses after living in this Mythological Socialist society (including elements of Free Market Libertarianism based on a model of proprietary communitarianism) society for long enough and then R/Acc (Right Acceleration) would then kick in and take us to Anarcho Collective Liberalism

In this Anarcho Collective Liberalism society, the state (and by extension equal distrubutation of wealth) would be abolished/dismantled (and there would be effectively no real taxes implemented ;the most anti tax fringe of the Tea Party idealized low taxes would be the only ones really implemented, this is because taxes are like theft and stock of present goods of the individuals affected and makes investment less rewarding)  There would be a reserve government adjacent that would be used only to step in ever so slightly to make sure society functions

In this Anarcho Collective Liberalism society, there would be a capitalist socialization of production, but only in a way that would be distorted. It would rely on cooperation, but ignore that the means of production are private. The means of production belongs to corporations.  collcap

This would place an emphasis on cooperative long term relationships, that would result in an economy that would be directed by "relational markets".  coll cap

This would include interlocking share ownership, where companies would own shares in other companies; which would result in a spirit of cooperation between the involved companies, due to each of them having an interest in the other's performance. This would result in stable ownership, which would lessen the potential for hostile takeovers and also "friendly" competition; companies would be encouraged to excel but for others’ benefit as well as themselves collcap

These things would be market based and privatized: Security and national defense, education, healthcare, banking and currency ancap (a GONGO established by the reserve government adjacent [my twist]would uses make make sure the privatized control the money is fair) and somewhat some or most roads than we have in the US now 

Law enforcement would be publicly (reddit sncap reformer)-privately (an cap)owned (in a modern China type way), but the people would have the option to give law enforcement charity and treat it as if it's really private)

Workers would traditionally expect more from their employers than they do now in western countries, including job security (often for life) , pensions and social protection. This system would be like peoplism collcap

The use of force, when not employed in self-defense, would be unjustified

Coercion in this set up would be as any initiation force, or threat thereof, over the property of another individual (which includes their body).ancap

There would be a natural right to own oneself and the appropriate natural resources that one employs before anyone else (i.e one's private property). It’s impossible to establish universal ethical norms if one is to deny this fact,ancap

In this system, any form of theft is illegitimate (though, depending on the case, some may argue not necessarily immoral) and in the same vein any regulation on individuals' behavior or control over their property which doesn't result from a contractually-binding, voluntary relationship would be illegitimate sncap

Since in this system, majority rule wouldn’t be seen as a legitimate form of electing representatives (since voluntary contracts must be unanimous) since there is no legitimate contract that binds the government and citizens together, let alone one that everyone has signed ancap

The Commons Dividend (quora idea for cap safety net) fused with an UBI model (the system used in Alaska being the ‘closest’ approximation of this)  would be used as social safety nets along with a quasi private charity workfarist method. Quasi private charities would be set up to help struggling Americans. These charities would rely on private donations from Americans to help other Americans (Americans would be heavily motivated to do so) but in a workfarist sort of way. It would provide food, shelter and utilities for people in times of need (like winter, or hot summers).  (nat soca workfare welfare method)

I would like to see the 19th century alliance between 19th century alliance between libertarian feminism and radical liberalism be recovered. This article reflects my thoughts on this and I echo that article

In our current static capitalistic society, I am ok with Universal Basic Income if it has privatized elements to it like Oakland California’s Universal Basic Income and the UBI recipients are required to give mutual aide to charities every so often after they get that UBI (or has some mutual aide element to it). Otherwise I do not support Universal Basic Income. Even if UBI met my conditions above to be ok with it, I would not pay more than 75 dollars a month to fund UBI (could be more if I got financially lucky or less if I became poorer)

I support embracing shared responsibility for challenging economic vulnerabilities. vulnerability .But I believe we need mutual aide (without taxes, regulations and limited medical care) to combat that  (mutual aide feels more natural and positive than one sided aide and it also removes the poor social stigma of those receiving that aide)

Far left

Anarcho Libertarian/Social Anarcho Syndacalist  slight Anarcho Monarchism

This would make it easier to set up revolutionary unions (dotp fusion w anarcho synd) similar to a Vanguard party organizing the working class defensibly in the case of a counter-revolution . 

Eventually the workers would through this challenge unjust hierarchies and then seize the means of production including property and the functions of the state/bourgeoisie destroying and expropriating these things by the working class and thus would easily abolish class, as well as prevent dictatorships from rising by using a dictatorship of the proletariat here (a DotP that is representative of the people and counterposed against the state against any counter revolutionaries/resistance and state bureaucracy)  similar to dictator in anarcho monarchism

There might be a traditional DotP here only if it could be set up like democratic workplace confederations and local assemblies that are like a DotP in all but a name

This is because you can’t create a Marxist Leninist society with heavy Anarchist elements within the confines of capitalism without a DotP, so then the DotP helps in abolishing our capitalistic state structure , our class society and the state so the possibility of a Marxist Leninist state with heavy Anarchist elements become a reality. 

During this transitional period it will become necessary for anarchists to protect and establish themselves by setting up their management of the economy in order to begin this process of transitioning to a society that Marxism Leninism with heavy Anarchist elements

Social Anarchism 

I support small businesses forming unions who would operate parallel to each other in business groups (similar to corporatism). This would mean the employees would get a bigger chunk of the profits from their employers via negotiation with each union and its corresponding business group. They would also get more input from the government or NGOs to ensure more fair labor practices and get our economy stimulated, and to help employers and employees instead of just employees. This essentially would be worker co-ops .This would make businesses stronger as it would build bonds between the employers and their employees ,each with their own unique contributions to make. This essentially would be worker co-ops

In this Marxist Leninist society with heavy Anarchist elements, eventually as the Marxist Leninist state gives way to more and more Anarchist elements, state owned enterprises would eventually operate in unregulated and open Anarchist markets until the state and markets withers away eventually incrementally leading to a Communistic society which is the end goal of Marxism Leninism

Left

Libertarian Anarchism (Libertarian [without adjectives, left and right], Anarchist, Agorist, Voluntaryist Autarchist, Ancap, Neolibertarian, Civil Libertarian, Paternal Libertarian, Worker co-op advocate but in a static capitalistic society, w elements of other), Libertarian Communist (fiscally conservative)

Libertarian

I support a social contract of consent between us citizens and the State which includes the non-aggression principle which i support libt

ideally without a vanguard party  libertarian new left

I personally support low taxes  libertarian

I personally want limited government and minimal state (libertarian)  to lead to an eventual abolishment of the state (including hierarchies and classes). This would form a society on a voluntary, cooperative basis without the recourse of force or compulsion (anarchism definition). My economic and blog views reflect this in some ways

This is because I support freedoms on the basis of the agreement with private property rights. So the abolishment of public amenities as I write below etc would be definitely something I would more than get on board with  libertarain 

People would fully own themselves and have certain ‘moral’ powers to acquire property rights in external types of things  def libertarian

I personally value the social institutions that enforce conditions that mesh with my economic views in this blog and I reject institutions that function in opposition to these economic views of me on the grounds that such interventions represent unnecessary coercion of individuals and abrogation of their economic freedom  librtan  right lib

I am ok with land redistribution. Earth's natural resources belong to everyone in an egalitarian manner, they should really be either unowned or owned collectively  libertarian  left libt

I support social freedom    left lib and right lib

Anarchism

including abolishing unnecessary coercion  anarchism

I support equal liberty and I feel that equal liberty rests on political, social and economic equality of opportunity In my opinion, Equality should not not come secondary to liberty. Equality should go beyond the formal equality of rights so as there is no tension between the two and no separation and conflict between individuals as passive recipients within society.  I feel that Liberty (and its realization) is collective as it should be shared instead of being diminished and thus being  'only imaginable in the contest of the liberty of all', It should be accompanied also by social and economic equality.  I support the principle of equal-liberty is an 'open-ended horizon that allows for endless permutations and elaborations. I feel liberty and equality can’t be implemented within the state, since it interrogates all forms of domination and hierarchy.  anarchism

including the abolishment of unnecessary coercion , hierarchies , the patriarchy, the heterosexist patriarchy, and classe  anarchism

Humans lived in societies that did not have formal hierarchies long before the establishment of formal states, realms, or empires. So we should get back to that way of life anarchism

Other

Maybe in this Nationalism Communism voluntary society or country, they would use mutualism until they become moneyless.Mutualism would mean worker co-ops, contract and federation , dual power and gradualism, free association, mutual aide and mutual credit etc Mutualism

In our current static capitalistic society, if we aren’t going to move left economically and ditch Capitalism , we should create wide spread worker co-ops within our static capitalistic economy. The Capital Hill Babysitting Co-op and credit unions are two examples of how a worker co-op would work within our current static capitalistic society, A cooperative is an autonomous association of persons that are united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise.  Cooperatives are controlled by their members democratically , with each member having one vote in electing the board of directors.  Anarchism economics  coops are mutualism but here it is worker co-ops within a capitalist economy

Ancap

With the markets in this system, citizens will be provided with enough material comforts to cause them to support the regime   . state lib related auth cap

I’d like this future system to eventually lead to a final future system with the privatization of everything, which would include cities with all their infrastructures, public spaces, streets and urban management systems (which would ease my concerns of public holiday events, see my Lifestyle blog for more) ancap

There would be self ownership and original appropriation which would combine personal and private property in this final future system ancap

In this final future system, there would be private ownership of the means of production and the allocation of the product of labor that are created by workers within the context of wage labour and the free market. Through decisions that property and capital owners would make regardless of the needs of the individual ancap

The state would be kept but all of its functions would be privatized ancap

This final future society would be a contractual society that would be based purely on voluntary action, entirely unhampered by violence or threats of violence ancap

Civil Libertarian

I support the rights of women to breastfeed publically libertarian civil lib

I am against involuntary commitment and outpatient commitment,  libertarian civil lib

I support the right to bear arms as a civil liberty libertarian civil lib

Agorism

state (i.e a gradual withdrawal of state support through Profitable Civil Disobedience  agorism

I typically oppose electoral voting and political reform and I instead stress the importance of alternative strategies outside political systems to achieve a free society  agorism volunaryism

Autocracy

I support self reliance   autocracy

I support Individualism and individual liberty for all people  autocracy

Neolibertarian

There would be moral commitment to negative liberty with principles for restricting liberty on the basis of a unanimous agreement in which everyone's particular interests receive a fair hearing (sort of like direct democracy). Which should be done in our current society too if you think about it but only if it can fit within our current society’s system  lib  neolibierian  also jives w state liberal

Paternalist libertarian

I conditionally support the state and similar institutions nudging people to make decisions that serve their own long-term interests  liberarina  lib paternalism

Fiscally conservative (Blue Dogs) Libertarian Communism (faux i.e modern US and real) 

Fisc con LibCom Basically there would be Capitalism with less layers of rules, regulations (or more effective ag 3w) , laws, diff Affirm action (not none or less), taxes. 

Fiscon libcom In this future system, there would be less involvement from the federal, state, and local level government (or at least when it leads to inefficient or long term unsustainable [fiscon] outcomes ecolib), less special fees and more targeted (not less) registrations, lower cost of complying with these sets of restraints etc

libcom fisc conThrough workers’ movements worldwide, a very lot of nations would join the same markets but they wouldn’t be as attached to these global markets in a way where a recession or depression in the the US would make them be effected by said recession or depression (due in part to Alter Globalization being used instead of Globalization and more non interventionalism in foreign markets by the US ecolib faux libcom). too

In this future system, our government would try to do more with less spending (like real Libertarian Communism but with money, government and markets)    libcom real fiscon

These ‘more with less’ low economic spending policies would innovatevaley fiscon create pro working class policies libcom and efficiently fiscon delivered services that would meet human needs libcom including the need for a safe enviornment  libcom real  fiscon and that would find innovative ways to do more with less fiscon 

 There would be an all hands on deck (common ownership of things/blue dog compromise) approach and direct democracy (libcom real like) ,

In this future system, the economy would benefit everyone by trickling down from the workers who empowered it, in order to help everyone rise high equally libcom real fiscon 

In this future system, the government would raise taxes to balance the budget in order to create a surplus to allow more spending on programs to create or expand social equality policies    fauxlibcom fiscon  . 

This a way of organizing society would be based on the principle of 'from each according to ability, to each according to need' libcom fiscon. Eventually through this there would be no division between employers and workers, and rich and poor, there is no longer a need for a body of organised violence controlled by a small number of people, like the police, to protect the property of the rich and enforce poverty, wage labour and even starvation on everyone else. With no need to accumulate capital or make profit there is no longer the need for armies to capture new markets and new resources.  both libcoms and fiscon

In this future system, there would be tax cuts and less regulation (including less Equality of Opportunity) of business which would to increase liberty (like in the Declaration of Independence)  and property rights. This would truly allow a free society

In this future system, the government would help workers from co-ops, collectives etc by promoting work efficiency (allowing for the best workers) that is not stymied by big governments  livnbcon fiscon

libcomThe government would provide individuals a defense against loss of social standing through the insistence on equality, essentially abolishing all hierarchy in favor of a centralized system where all but a very few are the same in power, wealth, and status. fiscon libcom But only if the government could do this with reduced spending (since every dollar that the government spends is a dollar taken from workers, regardless of whether it is from debt or taxes) and after tax cuts (since tax cuts would result in economic growth leading in turn to higher government revenues)  fiscon montersry

FisCon libcom.   Instead of Anarchy we should have Anarcho Conservatism which is more early non socialistic New Deal than real socialistic New Deal (which would include at least either partly privatizing SSI or doing to SSI what Jo Jorgensen wants to do to it. prosperous lifestyles (as well as the best for the continual sustenance of a libertarian social order) which should be encouraged, especially via positive influence (not ostracism), employing covenant communities which may exclude those who violate common values (similar to economic liberalism),   and none or less subsides. toretain order,balance and paternalism set up

Center

Anarcho Libertarian

I view the individual and the will of the individual over external determinants including society, groups, tradition (variable), and ideologies . I view the eventual abolition of the state as the fullest realization of individual liberty 

Without any government, I believe that individuals will pursue their personal objectives and work together in mutual self interest to create a stable and harmonious hierarchyless/patriarchyless society.

I have a strong sense of self and resistance to conformity and certain types of traditions (like graduation gowns w caps, dressing up for horse races, most holidays and similar things)

Far Center

Libertarian Anarchism  

I am a …. Libertarian Anarchist (including Dark Mutualim, Egoism)

It would use a A.R State AE Eco Lib system (Ayn Rand state actually existing economic liberal market system) with the labor theory of value what GBS called LibertarianAnarchism of Benjamin Tucker)

An A.R State AE Eco Lib system fuses actually existing Ayn Rand economic liberalism with Ayn Rand state economic liberalism.

The A.R State AE Eco Lib system with the labor theory of value is a less bad path than the anarcho communism path for the development of that socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society

In this set up, wealth would initially be distributed equally and or we would use predistrubutism . Through labor theory of value and the A.R State AE Eco Lib system, interests, profits, rents and usury might luckily disappear 

In this labor theory of value free market, people would get paid in proportion to how much labor they did and that exploitation or usury would take place if they were not doing that

So labor theory of value banking in the A.R State AE Eco Lib system path would cause more money to be available and in turn this might allow proliferation of new businesses which would then raise demand for labor. Thus this vindicates the labor theory of value due to equal amounts of labor would receive equal pay. Then we would be in our socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society. Hopefully this future society will have pre Capitalism elements to it

If there are issues using the above A.R State AE Eco Lib system with the labor theory of value, on our way to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society , we would scale back the A.R State AE Eco Lib’s ‘free markets’ and temporarily switch to a Social Market/Social Credit for our labor theory of value transition to an libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society until we were able to switch back to an A.R State AE Eco Lib ‘free markets’

With a temporary Social Market/Social Credit , it would include free market capitalism alongside moderate economic intervention (and possilikely more) in order (at the very least when necessary) to ensure fair competition as we break out of the possible jam including with the government issuing debt free money directly to consumers or producers on the condition that that they sell their product below cost to consumers) along with a moderate welfare state including [pensions, health care, unemployment benefits, and maybe, a national dividend and or universal basic income]). 

Using this temporary safety net, it would still preserve staples of A.R State AE Eco Lib like private property,  free trade, unregulated prices etc. It would allow temporary social control of credit and increase consumer's purchasing power and decentralize economic power. Money would act as a medium of communication by which consumers would temporarily direct the distribution of production. 

When combined with the labor theory of value, there would be more money and purchasing power for people .

Furthermore, this temporary safety net would reduce poverty and still allow economic freedom in this transition . But eventually we would we would need break free of this temporary safety net and go back to A.R State AE Eco Lib system because the more free the markets, the more effective the labor theory of value will be 

If the A.R State AE Eco Lib system with the labor theory of value did not create income equality or lead us to our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society, and we were now in a Capitalism in decay society it wouldn’t be as bleak as it appears. We would have basically done what Left acceleration does

However, I believing that such revolutionary actions to achieve this (like strikes) should be organized responsibly by free workers rather than by bureaucratic union officials and organizations . This would prevent tragedies like the Haymarket massacre. Benjamin Tucker (similar to autonomously which comes next. which is left wing and meshes with the LEFT auth theme of the blog)

I am open to supporting the US having a private police force which could also be used to break up violent strikes to protect the employer's freedom   Benjamin Tucker

I like this quote by Benjamin Tucker “if I go through life free and rich, I shall not cry because my neighbor, equally free, is richer. Liberty will ultimately make all men rich; it will not make all men equally rich. Authority may (and may not) make all men equally rich in purse; it certainly will make them equally poor in all that makes life best worth living". Keep in mind I incorporate egalitarianism into my Libertarian Anarchism  Benjamin Tucker

Libertarian Communist

https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/far-center-blog-left-authoritarian-who.html

Libertarian Anarchist

If you take the subprime lending of like the 1990s, but implement it in a mutualist -Marxist Leninist mixed economy that would be a decent system to implement  also auth left theme

Unions may use the threat of revolutionary (i.e anarcho-totalitarian methods  )

My motto is “No war but class war”  Anarchism

I support a reimagining of Labor Unions that addresses the concerns of the film Blue Collar (1978).  I am only a weak supporter of Labor Unions under our current capitalistic economy. Once we begin to truly transition to or become socialistic, I will be a Radical Cheerleader for labor unions  Anarchism Anarcha fem

Worker path (Autonomy or New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics) to our socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society:

Method 1: We use New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics to undermine the State's moral authority and outright power until they have been so thoroughly undermined, revolutionary market anarchist legal and security enterprises would arise from underground and ultimately suppress government as a criminal activity (with taxation being treated as theft, war being treated as mass murder, etc). Basically using a Agorist-Syndicalist alliance  libertarian agorism including synd

Method 2. (Autonomy): Revolutionary actions (like strikes) being organized responsibly by free workers rather than by bureaucratic union officials and organizations . This would prevent tragedies like the Haymarket massacre. I tend to be antipathetic to formal syndicalism, as I see it as reformist.

In the market path, we would use a dual economy implemented on this path. 

Dark Mutualism (Dark version of Mutualism which is Free Market Anarchism) Egoist (logo for generic Anarchist, also Ben Tucker) economics would be geared either for local needs in a local needs sector or in the modern sector while the A.R State AE Eco Lib would be geared either toward the global export market or in the primitive sector. 

There probably would be two separate, autonomous ‘free markets’ : Dark Mutualism and Egoist econimics  (for the local needs sector or in the modern sector) and A.R State AE Eco Lib (for the global export market or in the primitive sector)

In this market path in the local needs sector or modern sector, it would use Dark Mutualism and Egoism in different parts of the local needs sector or modern sector . Here is some background on Dark Mutualism

In this market path, in the Egoist part of the local needs sector or modern sector in the market path, money would be issued for a limited period by constant value (neither inflation, nor deflation). There would be long term saving which would require investment in bonds or stocks. 

All land would be commonly owned or else the property of public institutions and can only be rented from the community or from government, respectively, not purchased in the Egoist part of the local needs sector or modern sector in the market path . They would also use Freihandel (free trade) system. 

Anarcho Syndicalists who use a non-systematic approach (inspired by Max Stirner according to polcompball) would help in creating and maintaining this society this Egoist economic system within this local needs sector or modern sector in this market path

Here is more about the Egoist economic system that would be used in the Egoist part of the local needs sector or modern sector in the market path

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, it would use Distributism as a social safety net for socioeconomic issues. This would mean , as a safety net, in the local needs sector or modern sector private banking would be dissolved in favor of Distributist types of financial cooperatives, mutuals (like credit unions), building societies, mutual banks and friendly societies.

There would be no or less profit-making basis in charging interest in this Distributist safety net in the local needs sector or modern sector 

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety net, there would be an abolishment of legal enforcement of interest-rate contracts (usury) issued by private banks. It would not entail nationalization but also would involve government involvement of some sort. This would also involve favoring the dissolution of other private financial intermediaries like insurance companies and industry funds.

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism (alt right related) is used as a safety net, the majority of the people would be able to earn a living without needing to rely the use of the property of other people to do so. 

As with farmers owning their own land and machinery, carpenters and plumbers owning their own tools etc. This cooperative approach would advance beyond this perspective to recognize that such property and equipment may be co-owned by local communities larger than a family, (i.e partners in a business)

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set, there would either be direct or indirect distribution of the productive assets) (means of production) in some ideological circles which would include the redistribution of wealth , to a wide portion of society instead of concentrating it just in the hands of a minority of wealthy elites . 

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set,  there might be a distributism-influenced social capitalism (also known as social market safety net as in the global exports sector or primitive sector part of this market path) in this safety net or a more socialist-oriented model like distributism-influenced libertarian socialism. Examples of these Distributism safety net methods of would include direct productive property redistribution, taxation of excessive ownership of property, and small-business subsidization

In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set, there would be strong antritrust laws and some sort of guild system. 

The existence of labor unions in this Distributism safety net would not constitute a realization of this facet of distributist safety net order, as labor unions are organized along class lines to promote class interests and class struggle.Guilds on the hand would mix class syndicates that would be composed of both employers and employees who would cooperate for mutual benefit, thereby promoting class collaboration. This doesn't mean that there would be no trade unions though.

I tend to be antipathetic to formal syndicalism, as I see it as reformist.  Anarchism 

I condemn but forgive to view as a necessary evil the Classical Anarchist aggression of the late 19th century (due to the goals of the Anarchists).  Anarchists have rightfully overthrown elite ruling classes, oppressive empires and states and should unite under than precept. Anarchy should be restored to the way it was in the late 19th century and early 20th century for me to embrace other forms of it besides the few I embrace now

the wage system would be retained based on the amount of labor performed). There might be collective cooperative markets in this society. There might be collective cooperative markets in this society. Some of the necessaries for production would be owned in common by labour groups and the free communes (these common-commune entities as a whole would be seen as individuals like corporations as a whole are currently seen as individuals in our society) .The methods of retribution/ distribution of labour, communist or otherwise, would be settled by each group for itself. Anarchism wo adje collective anarchism

I support synthesist anarchist federations, as an alternative to the 1920s Libertarian Communist platformism that would form under the principles of anarchism without adjectives. I support this synthesist’s approach for a far looser organization that maximizes numbers (like big tent approach). My pro synthesist anarchism views can be seen throughout this blog  anarcho w adjet

However, I am an ally of anti-private property Libertarians so I am connected to their anti-private property views  left lib according to murray rothbard

newly Collectivized Federal Bank (Wall Street style refinancialization) which would be split up as collective federations. non bank employee organizations would also become Collectivized federations ..These unions would become Collectivized federations  libertarian synd according to murray rothbard

since I very often feel that the proper role for government is to provide national defense, a court system for civil disputes, a criminal justice system for acts of force and fraud, and little else)  ron paul libert

I am a free-market environmentalist, I assert private property rights in relation to environmental protection and pollution prevention. ron paul libt

I support the right to keep and bear arms ron paul libt

I support habeas corpus for political detainees. ron paul libt

I am against federal use of torture ron paul libt

I am against presidential autonomy  libt ron paul

As per the the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, I advocate for states' rights to decide how to regulate social matters not cited directly by the Constitution  ron paul libt

I want the TSA to be abolished and to move matters of airline security to private businesses. libt ron paul

I believe that the notion of the separation of church and state is currently misused by the court system, to quote Ron Paul “In case after case, the Supreme Court has used the infamous 'separation of church and state' metaphor to uphold court decisions that allow the federal government to intrude upon and deprive citizens of their religious liberty."  libt rn paul

I was and still am against war with Iran  libr rn paul

tan War  . I am opposed to Neoconservatism and U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, as both have inadvertently caused terrorist reprisals against Americans, such as the 9/11 attacks.  libt rn paul

I conditionally and generally support the legalization of at least many victimless crimes  one word libt

I support the Non-aggression principle libt one word  in a way that Mark Twain would support it (his contradictory views article on priv property)

I am opposed to punitive intellectual property rights laws (like with Fatal Fury wrongly being sued for bring too similar to Strret Fighter II), and the concept of intellectual property in general  in regards to the state as such things cause monopolies and distortion. The state should not be a foundation for any class of rightful property, but I am open to the idea of Media Created Property  agorism

I feel that coercion is immoral, inefficient and unnecessary for human life and fulfillment We need to fight back against people preying on their neighbors, they are free to prey on their neighbors and we are free fight back  New Libertarian Manifesto and Agorist Class Theory 

o me, New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics is immediate self-liberation from statist controls, to whatever practical degree is practical, by applying entrepreneurial logic to logically decide which laws to discreetly break and when.  We need to trade risk for profit, but profit would never refer to any gain in perceived value rather than strictly monetary gains (as a consequence of the subjective theory of value).  libertarian agorism   anarchism

Ayn Rand stage economic liberalism are Ayn Rand economically liberal free markets (similar to AnCap markets)  Lib Anarchism Ancap

I believe the government should abolish hate crime laws and instead use Libertarian paternalism methods to nudge/influence DAs to give hate crime like sentences for criminals who commit hate crime against protected groups . I also want the government to use Libertarian paternalism methods to nudge/influence people not go commit hate crimes in the first place   libtr  libtr patcon 

I support the Hyde Amendment but I also support the government using Libertarian paternalism methods to nudge/influence charities, pro choice groups etc to pay for abortions for women who want an abortion but cannot afford an abortion   libt pat,  libtr liban

Ayn Rand state actually existing economic liberal market system is an economic system that purportedly uses Ayn Rand economic liberalism but where in the the global exports sector or primitive sector of the dual economy ONLY, the government uses Libertarian paternalism through nudging/influencing the free markets (instead of state regulation or direct intervention) , the government actually has indirect significant state influence and unofficial partnerships with the private industry and free markets (in the global exports sector or primitive sector of the dual economy ONLY) themselves through the government using these Libertarian paternalism methods  libt paternal lib anarchy

Anarcho Egoism non economics

I also support the Max Stirner inspired brand of Queer Anarchism . I support their notion of (and embracing) radical individualism that is influenced by individual philosophers like Max Stirner. In particular I support Queer Anarchists using Max Stirner’s non-systematic approach, radicalism and direct action. I like how queer anarchists organized and played a major role  in the WTO protests and anti-globalization movement. 

Queer paternalism and the Max Stirner inspired brand of Queer Anarchism are the pro Queer rights methods I like because as it seeks positive change for Queer people in the best way

I emphasize the individual over any other kind of guiding principle (apart from God). The individual should do as they please within reason (disclaimer within reason means legal) not bound by any rigid, unjust or punitive government or moral code or rules

I believe that there are no sacred ideas, objective facts or real meanings (apart from God) 

I feel that since each unique person is non-existant except in their created and creative state , there can't be a single objective or even subjective meaning to anything (apart from God). Which means that I reject pursuit of devotion to "a great idea, a good cause, a doctrine, a system, a lofty calling" (outside of God). This includes politics (read the end of My Story section) since I have no political calling (frankly my desr I don’t give a damn)

 I "live myself  out" without regard to "how well or ill humanity may fare thereby". 

People who are hard hearted cannot be saved they are the 'creative nothing' and there is nothing to do for them except let them be it - they can't not be it - like someone can be immoral or sinful.

Having a cause to fight for our nation is wrong since the nation is a self interest entity, as the nation aims at improving or furthering itself - as the cost of soldiers, resources, allies, civil liberties, democracy and so on

From Max Stirner “Sacred things exist only for the egoist who does not acknowledge themself, the involuntary egoist [...] Because they would like to cease to be an egoist, they look about in space and earth for higher beings (apart from God) to serve and sacrifice themselves to; but, however much they shake and discipline themself, in the end they do all for their own sake On this account I call him the involuntary egoist." Max Stirner.

Max Stirner said that all Individuals do actually serve themselves -whether it is consciously or involuntarily. Involuntarily egoists want to throw away their selfishness (usually because it is assumed to be a negative thing) and so they serve other ideas such as cults or human rights, or the law because they believe it is the right thing to do. This gives them personal security or happiness (which is still benefitting them selfishly - as they remain an egoist) - "

While, voluntary egoists serve themselves and sees these sacred ideas as regular - ideas - and liberates themselves able to do whatever is in their power that is not against Jesus’s two commandments in Matthew. 

The Moral authority Law (non violent and non sexual laws like select victimless crime laws, punitive laws and unjust laws, basically the type of laws Agorists and Benjamin Tucker want to break for an Anarchist society or the type of laws that Rosa Parks CORRECTLY and AWESOMELY broke in the 1960s) and Human Rights etc. are the only ideas that aren’t physically tangible or touchable concepts. Chtistianity also is abstract as God purposely made Christianity like that

Those ideas are spooks because they are only ever a made-up idea that the Individual has created, the idea of a good citizen is defined by people and individuals and yet, it has become a corporeal and ever existing concept and phenomena which compels people to act in accordance. Individuals are haunted by their own ideas, this idea has become real and now forces people to follow it. People decided what a good citizen was and made up the consequences for breaking this "rule" and now we are trapped due to us embracing  our own ideas 

Nothing will happen if victimless, punitive and unjust laws (basically the type of laws that Agorists and Benjamin Tucker want to break to cause an Anarchist society or laws like the law that Rosa Parks CORRECTLY and AWESOMELY broke in the 1960s) are broken until someone acts upon it

Only illegal if someone gets caught - only a criminal if there is such a thing as that type of crime

I am opposed the state - as an enforcer of institutions, submission, and force. To quote Max Stirner, "war might rather be declared against establishment itself, the State, not a particular State, not any such thing as the mere condition of the State at the time; it is not another State (e.g. a "people's State") that men aim at, but their union, uniting, this ever-fluid uniting of everything standing. — A State exists even without my co-operation: I am born in it, brought up in it, under obligations to it, and must "do it homage." [huldigen] It takes me up into its "favor," [Huld] and I live by its "grace."

Revolution and insurrection are not synonymous. The former is radical change of conditions, of  prevailing status or condition , the state or society, and is thus a political or social act.

The latter has a transformation of conditions which is an inevitable result, but doesn’t start from that, but it starts the discontent of human beings with themselves; it’s not an armed uprising, but of a rising up of people, without the regard for the arrangements that spring from it. 

The revolution is aimed at new arrangements, while the insurrection leads us to no longer let ourselves be arranged. It instead seeks to arrange ourselves, and set no radiant hopes on any institutions.

It is not a fight versus the establishment, since, if this prospers, the establishment would collapse of itself. 

It is only a working of a person’s way out of the establishment. If they leave the establishment, it is dead and falls into decay. Since now their aim would not be the overthrow of the established order but their rising up above it, their intention and action would not be a political or social intention and action, but, since they are directed really toward themselves and their ownness, an egoistic intention and action

The revolution demands that a person makes arrangements; the insurrection demands that a person stand or raise themselves up. 

Jesus was not a revolutionary, but he was instead an insurrectionist, a rebel. To quote Max Stirner,

“The time [in which Jesus lived] was politically so agitated that, as is said in the gospels, people thought they could not accuse the founder of Christianity more successfully than if they arraigned him for 'political intrigue', and yet the same gospels report that he was precisely the one who took the least part in these political doings. But why was he not a revolutionary, not a demagogue, as the Jews would gladly have seen him? [...] Because he expected no salvation from a change of conditions, and this whole business was indifferent to him. He was not a revolutionary, like Caesar, but an insurgent: not a state-overturner, but one who straightened himself up. [...] [Jesus] was not carrying on any liberal or political fight against the established authorities, but wanted to walk his own way, untroubled about, and undisturbed by, these authorities. [...] But, even though not a ringleader of popular mutiny, not a demagogue or revolutionary, he (and every one of the ancient Christians) was so much the more an insurgent who lifted himself above everything that seemed so sublime to the government and its opponents, and absolved himself from everything that they remained bound to [...]; precisely because he put from him the upsetting of the established, he was its deadly enemy and real annihilator[.]"  

I sympathize with Benjamin Tucker’s rejecting the idea of moral rights and abandoning natural rights positions along with his rule of might and rule of contract

While I believe that land is legitimately transferred through force unless contracted otherwise in rare cases,  I also believe that equal liberty and occupancy and use doctrines are generally trustworthy guiding principles of actions 

Parallel right

Anarcho Libertarian

Some of my Anarcho Libertarian ideologies comes from similar ways of thought that Classical Liberalism comes from .But I feel that Classical Liberalism should reject the state and all those other meaningless social constructs.

I fight against the will of the authoritative majority

I fight for people not to assimilate into the authoritative majority’s hive mind

I feel that only the self may rule their own person.

Right

Anarcho Libertarian

I don’t see the appeal of Capitalism

While I am not a fan of Anarcho Capitalism, I do like the passionate individualism of Anarcho Capitalism (as long as it means I don't get to work).

Far right

I am a .. Left-Wing Laissez Fairist-Anarcho Individualist (labor theory of value and Agorist)/Left Libertarian and Left (Wing Laissez faire) Rothbardian Democratic (Paternalistic Conservative) Cap

https://myviewsrightviews2.blogspot.com/2022/04/fiscal-issues.html

Benjamin Tucker labor theory of value (Anarcho Libertarian ie Anarcho Individualist) in Left Wing Laissez faire (combined with Agorism which is Anarchistic) 

Left Rothbardian (which is almost like Left wing Anarcho Capitalism) fused with Left Wing Laissez faire property rights within a Democratic Capitalist-Paternalistic Conservative system

Fringe right 

Anarcho Libertarian 

I view the individual and the will of the individual over external determinants including society, groups, tradition (variable), and ideologies . I view the eventual abolition of the state as the fullest realization of individual liberty 

Without any government, I believe that individuals will pursue their personal objectives and work together in mutual self interest to create a stable and harmonious hierarchyless/patriarchyless society.

I have disdain for authoritarian authority (and some other forms of authority) and hierarchies

I prefer to “go my own way" as opposed to letting my ideas be influenced by those around me

Sometimes I’m willing to work with fellow Anlibs and others with similar political views to me if it benefits me to do so. But I will always keep true to my ideological convictions of true individual liberty

Libertarian Aristocrat

I support outsiders who band together in their individualistic struggle against society and in pursuance of their own curiosity, pride, and instinct against society.

After we rightfully remove all forms and structures of material domination, hierarchy and sovereignty, I would want (and I would others to want) to project positive influence (without hierarchy and authority) in a sweeping influential manner

Agorist

Even though this autonomous People’s Democracy is a (peaceful) dictatorship of the proletariat, it would allow classes like the peasantry, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie classes to participate somehow possilikely via Democratic workers councils and with further aid from underground networks, black markets and counter economics via Agorist methods

Through this autonomous People’s Democracy we can build cohesion within our Marxist Leninist ranks by merging our Marxist Leninist movements and political parties with Social Democrat movements and parties . We still need a state to bring in a revolution. I believe that a multiparty system can exist within a Marxism-Leninist type of government. 

This autonomous People’s Democracy will include be an upgraded and independent vanguard party (made up in large part by many coalitions of unions) to be taken by the social class (i.e Democratic workers councils as opposed to the dictator of the Proletariat) to exert political power (and force) against oppressive class(es) like Aristocracy and the Bourgeoisie to end divisiveness and create harmony. Agorism can further be used to aid this