Parallel Right Mises Paleolibertarian , Left libertarian, Libertarian Party Anarchism
to do Libertarian Market Socialist rpl Libertarian Mutualist
Includes Anarchism due to right libertarian to Anarchism pipeline mentioned on reddit
Left Libertarian, Bleeding Heart Libertarian, Libertarian Party including Mises caucus and Paleolibertarian
Anarchist and Left Libertarian views are from Left Libertarianism including non socialist Mutualism, (Alliance of Left Libertarian including New Left Murray Rothbard and Voluntary Cooperation society for things like redistribution etc), Mutualism lite [Libertarian Market Socialism] (which is Libertarian Socialism on a Market Socialist economy instead of Market Anarchism with Classical economics of the Carson Long Tucker Mutualism , maybe also including PJ Proudhon Mutualism), Crusade of Roman Left Lib,
Bleeding Heart Libertarian blog Left Lib views (written by Kevin Carson associate Gary Chartier) that has left lib views from American Conservative mag writer Sheldon Richman , New Left M Rothbard (ie for markets see above), Kevin Carson-Benjamin Tucker Left lib views that are not connected to markets, and not socialistic or overtly socialistic (dr jeklyl Kevin as right libs would say), tankiejerks left lib quadrant wo market or even economic views
doesn’t include Kevin Carson-Benjamin Tucker mutualism (or views except as noted above), overt or substantial Libertarian Socialism (except noted above and below), Steiner-Vallentyne Left Lib, Geolibertarianism-Georgism
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html
freed market link on BHL blog which mentioned left and right libt unity points linked mentioned they have some unity on freed market the link to that was to human interactions article
I am a Social Democrat (anti statist fuses w lp and libertarianism and Social Market variety), Left Libertarian(including Mutualist (PJ Proudhon) but especially Mutualism lite [Libertarian Market Socialism liberarian socialism in a market socialist economy] and non socialist Mutualism i.e Market Anarchist)/Minarchist, Anarcho (‘ conlib on steroids’ [what okanarchybuddy calls Anarchists]) Libertarian and Peronist (Menemism) notes. Minarchist a lp ideology, libertarians in Europe use Mutualism (all forms) lp is right lib but here is bhl and left lib
I support the Labour Party UK (New Labour/Jeremy Corbyn-Keri Starmer Labour/Third Way/Third Way Social Democracy)
My combined economic views are concepts of Economic *Progressiveness [Lp platform, menemist, Con lib but I upgrade it to better reflect this blog from liberal to prog etc] (i.e SupCap [lp is Cap], Neo Keynesianism[lp at least open to keynes but they like monetarism which New Keynesians Ben Beranke and Paul Krugman use to be], Libertarian Marxism, Democratic Classical Liberalism (class lib meshes w Menemism, Con lib, libertarianism etc this diff form) with some elements of Libertarianism Socialism (crusade of roman had elements of libsoc too), some ideas from Communism (crusade of roman had some ideas from communism too) other leftish wing schools of socioeconomic thought). This can be seen in virtually all of my economic views in this blog note I upgraded real economic prog things with alt economic progressive things above to better mesh w this blog
I support the Libertarian Party Tea Party
I want us to either have a New Keynesianism ,Peronist (Menemist) Social Market economy that uses a Social Capital (HumanisticCap fused with DemocraticCap) as a social safety net or to transition to a Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society (post statist is dog whistle for Anarcho monarchism, anarchy theme of blog, fused w con rev means anarcho strasserist which tankiejerk left libs were smeared as by tankies conrev is self described as con rev. w 1920s non fascist reg con rev fused w the totaliarianism of an monarch it really is anarcho strasserism
New Keynesianism Peronist (Menemist) Social Market economy that uses a Social Capital (HumanisticCap fused with DemocraticCap) as a social safety net
Based on a macroeconomic school of thought that would strive to provide more consistent micro-foundations to Keynesianism. New Keynesianism would be Keynesian in the short run but neoclassical in the long run
Like for menu costs, the restaurants would print out new menus in response to their price changes. However, the menu cost would actually be the cost of the firms adjusting to their nominal prices.
This burden would cause businesses to change prices slowly instead of continuously.
The macroeconomic effect of changing a single firm's price on the demand of all products would be "aggregate-demand externality."
The staggering of prices: Using this New Keynesian model, enterprises wouldn’t set prices at the exact same time. Each would care about its price relative to the ones that are charged by other firms. Because of this, the prices would be sluggish because no firms would want to be the first to increase its price significantly.
Coordination failure: Because the number of businesses is a lot, it's hard to predict what other businesses may do after the money supply adjustment. The failure of businesses to coordinate such changes in prices is a possible explanation for recessions that New Keynesianism would be used to point out
Efficiency wages: New Keynesianism would be used to show how markets might fail to clear due to the tendency of employers to pay above equilibrium wages.
Abnormally high wages cause existing workers to be more productive and thus less likely to switch to a new job. New Keynesianism would shine a light on this
Moreover, New Keynesianism would have two models that don't appear in traditional Keynesianism:
New Keynesian DSGE model would shine a light on how enterprises and households are assumed to have rational expectations, but prices are set by monopolistically competitive firms and can not shift quickly enough or without cost.
New Keynesian Phillips Curve ,similar to an expectations-augmented Phillips curve, would show ho the trade-off between unemployment and inflation is only applicable in the short run.
New Keynesianism would better for Monetarism and Neoliberalism lp ie mises than regular Keynesianism is to them
This would be paired with a Peronist (Menemist) Social market economy
Option 2 transition path to a Post Statist (Anarcho Monarchist) Conservative Revolutionary (Strasserist) society (Anarcho strasserist fake ideology of tankie jerk left libs)
We would use a non Socialist Mutualism (ie AOTLL /Voluntary society/New Left M Rothbard, mises is pro m rothbard) to get to our Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society.
We would first need to switch to a Distributist Libertarianism (economy before using a a non Socialist Mutualism to get there this meshes w left lib and mutualism and even lp
With Distributist Libertarianism there would be an economic system based on widely-spread property ownership and a society that is culturally based on Catholic social teachings.
This temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy would not be operated under the belief that laissez-faire Austrian school economics (but it would use this type of Austrian economics mises is pro austrian economics) would result in an unfair concentration of power, but rather that the vast majority of concentration of power in a capitalist economic systems occurs due to state intervention in the economy (for example; Intellectual "Property", Subsidies, Inconsistent Taxation, etc)
In this temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy the state would only have most of its power in most matters over the Federal Government. There would be less taxation which would deplete the power of the Federal Government. In turn the government would be forced to give up certain arms that are no longer needed (like the ATF)
Distributist Libertarianism, entails that State's should have In order to achieve that, in the essay "Unlocking Existentialism in An Economy: Southern Distributism in a Nutshell" an idea was proposed that less taxation would starve the power of the. This would require the.
Moreover, , in this temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy , vertical integration would be banned to allow more competition within the market, and to later (as we get closer to our Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society) have guilds (i.e meshes w anarcho strasserism) within local economies to protect small businesses and workers
This temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy would contain many dynamic thoughts from a Laissez-Faire (lp) approach, to a more "Bull-Moose yet Hamiltonian" Southern Distributism approach. The temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy would structure our society in a way that maximizes human freedom and ensures a wide distribution of wealth.
Then we would be in our non Socialist Mutualism stage. In this non Socialist Mutualism stage, there would be (local activist, alternative institutions and mutual-aid organizations formed and direct action non soca lib left mutualism )
In our non Socialist Mutualism stage , through self organization that is based on cooperative and libertarian participation we would achieve equality. It would be more-or-less market-oriented and more anti corporatist (until we restructure corporatism in our eventual Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society) than anti Capitalist (but it would still be anti Capitalist)
In our non Socialist Mutualism stage , corporations that are dependent on the state largesse would be seized by workers and others
In our non Socialist Mutualism stage ,redistribution of wealth would occur. However, redistribution of wealth would only be effected by the legal system (apart from the state) than through other methods of redistribution of wealth
That would deny the validity of privileges that were secured by the state which only serve to preserve the well connected bourgeois while causing the poor to be poor. Through solidaristic mutual aide, and via a privilege liberated market (as mentioned above) , people would eat the rich so to speak. Mutual aide would be used here because it treats people giving and receiving aide as equal instead of poor and non poor (so it dignifies the poor) anarchy eo bombs connected to kevin carson
Other elements of this non Socialist Mutualism stage I would want to be implemented can be found here in this Alliance of the Libertarian Left collection (mostly Murray Rothbard during his alliance with the New Left)
If our non Socialist Mutualism to became bumpy or fell apart (like the USSR’s path to ‘Communism’, we would switch to Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) to lead us to that society
Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism instead of classic economic market anarchism of carson long tucker mutualism). i.e Mutualism Lite) would follow the libertarian principle of limited government that would be combined with the economic view that while the means of production would belong to the workers who use them, the goods and services would be provided through a market (Socialist) economy that worker owned businesses and co-ops contribute to
This would transition path would either a representative state with very limited power, or a municipal direct democracy, most likely with elected administrators who are at higher levels of government
Here are more aspects of how this transition path would be
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, it very well possilikely may include things below: (P Proudhon version done a lot in Europe by libertarians)
Individual liberty and unifies the social, individualist, and market schools of anarchist thought,
Free association, free banking, reciprocity in the form of mutual aid, workplace democracy, workers' self-management, gradualism , anti Capitalistand dual power
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path the primary aspects of labor would be required to produce a good or service. Anyone who would sell goods would charge no more than the cost to themselves of acquiring these goods.
Producers would exchange their goods at cost-value using systems of contract.
This could be based on cost-value that is based on fixed assumptions on the value of labor-hours, and other factors such as the labor intensity of labor, work nature . There might be expanded notions of federation.
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path , dual power likely could be used to build alternative institutions to the ones that currently exist in modern society.
As PJ Proudhon exlained “Beneath the governmental machinery, in the shadow of political institutions, out of the sight of statemen and priests, society is producing its own organism, slowly and silently; and constructing a new order, the expression of its vitality and autonomy.”
Dual power is a more specific scenario where a revolutionary entity would be intentionally maintaining the structure of the previous political institutions until the power of the previous institution is weakened enough such that the revolutionary entity could overtake it entirely.
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, association would only be necessary where there would be an organic combination of forces.
This operation would require specialization and a lot of various workers that would perform their individual tasks to complete a unified product (like a factory).
In this situation, in this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, workers very well might be inherently dependent on each other as without association they would be related as subordinate and superior, master and wage slave. An operation that could be performed by an person without the help of specialized workers would not require association.
PJ Proudhon argued that peasants don’t require societal form and that only feigned association that are for solidarity purposes in abolishing rents, buying clubs and so on. Proudhon recognized that their work is inherently sovereign and free
This Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path might involve creating an industrial democracy (a system where workplaces would be democratically handed over to organized workers' associations). Such associations would be models for agriculture, industry and trade.
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite), workers might not any longer sell their labor to a capitalist but rather work for themselves in co-ops.
PJ Proudhon's market socialism that we might use in our Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path is indissolubly linked to his idea of an industrial democracy and the self management of workers
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, there would likely be mutual credit where free banking might be taken back by the people to establish systems of free credit.
This would because the banks have a credit monopoly, just like capitalists have a means of production monopoly or that landlords have a land monopoly.
Banks essentially create money by lending out deposits that don’t actually belong to them, then charging difference interest.
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, if we establish a mutual savings bank or credit union that is run democratically, it would be possible to issue free credit in order for money to be created for the benefit of the participants instead of for the benefit of the bankers.
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, the motto for property might be property is theft", "property is liberty" and "property is impossible“
This would be to distinguish between what two distinct forms of property that are often bound up in the single label.
This is the distinction between property that is created by coercion and property that is created by labor.
Property would be theft when it’s related to a landowner or capitalist whose ownership of it is derived from conquest or exploitation and is only maintained through the state, property laws, police, etc
Property would be freedom for the lower income people or artisan family who has a natural right to a home, land which they may cultivate, basically to tools of a trade and the fruits of that labor. But they would not have them to ownership or control of the lands and lives of other people.
The former would be considered illegitimate property while the latter would be considered legitimate property.
On this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, if we use this system, it would awaken in people the appreciation of and desire for freedom, but also to inspire them a determination to abolish the legal restrictions that are now placed upon non-invasive human activities and to institute (through purely voluntary associations), such measures that will liberate all of us from the exactions of privilege and the power of concentrated capital.
Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) differs from anarcho-communism and similar collectivist philosophies by its support for private property
Unlike capitalist private-property supporters, Proudhon stressed equality. He believed that all workers should own property and have access to capital. Proudhon stressed that in every co-op "every worker employed in the association [must have] an undivided share in the property of the company"
In this Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, we probably would use Usufruct
If so, land would not be a commodity to be bought and sold, but be conditional titles that would be based on occupancy and use norms.
There would be debate about whether an individual would have a legit claim to land ownership of land if he or she is not currently using that land but in fact already incorporated his or her labor into it.
But there would be no debate about the fact that everything that is produced by human labor and machines would be owned as personal property.
There would be a rejection of the idea of non-personal property and non-proviso Lockean sticky property. Any property that is obtained through through violence, exploitation, or bought with money that was gained violating usufruct property norms would considered illegitimate
By establishing usufruct property norms, exclusive non-personal ownership of the means of production by the capitalist class would be eliminated.
The laboring classes would then be able to directly access the means of production, which would enable them to freely work and produce in worker owned enterprises while they would retain the full value of whatever they sell.
Libertarian Mutualism path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) transitional path, its more than likely that Wage labor (wage slavery variant) would be eliminated and it would be impossible to become a capitalist due to the widespread labor market would no longer existing. No one would be able to own the means of production in the form of non-personal property (two ingredients that are necessary for the exploitation of labor). The capitalist class would thus labor along with the rest of society note the break up of banks like above is very anarcho strasserist
Then we would be in our Post Statist (anar monarchist) Conservative Revolutionary (strasserist) society (anarcho strasserist)
This Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society would be autonomous , anti capitalist and especially anti international capitalist. It would be part of a bunch of transnational worker societies that would continue to be run with Libertarian socialism within a market socialist economy. But guild socialism would be involved now note strasseridm
The Guild Socialism (which is also libertarian) would advocate for continued and or more worker ownership of the Means of Production but now through trade guilds that would have an implied contractual relationship with the public.
The guilds would also use some aspects of Social corporatist (were in my original para right blog as a mix to create laissez faire but here it changed, soc corp is like literal social dem fascism and is used in tripartisan in nordic model organizational structure and negotiating tactics that are based on a social partnership between the interests of entrepreneurs/unions and labor (there would be no capital or corporations since in our transition phase we phased those out).
They would use collective bargaining and the limited/minimal state or post state adjacent would be involved. They would be mutually engaged consultations that are mediated by the limited/minimal state or post state adjacent. There would also be even more democratic workplaces soccorp
This would be amongst a backdrop of a supranational anarchistic limited/minimum state/post state strasserism (similar to what (anarchistic) Mikhail Bakunin wanted) . These societies would have some culturally regional liberal chauvinism amongst a greater belonging of this type of supranational structure.strasserism
There would be a monarch adjacent (leader) that is counterposed against limited/minimal state or post state adjacent bureaucracy, a representative for the people against the state or state adjacent. anarcho monarchy
These societies (with big bank broken up and run Mutually theme etc see above) would be autonomously patriotic strasseristic anarcharistic
These societies would have a Meritocratic system like this but where the community itself gets to decide themselves. This also entails ecological protection of the workers land that they helped create through blood, tears and sweat
These societies might be a Minarchist state with limited or minimal state . This would include temporary measures with a social safety net that benefits the working class (but ideally and likely using non state authority since this Minarchist state would likely have no control over the monetary policy) . lp and right lib minarchist in europe minarchists are left libs
With no state or a limited or minimal state, the Gold standard would be able to be brought back and we would might even have a gold based economy m friedman lp mises etc meshes w anarcho strasserism
I support the Libertarian Party Tea Party
I am an Anti Crony Capitalist and against nearly to virtually all other forms of Capitalism too
I am an Anti Crony Capitalism , Anti Monopoly Capitalism and systematically very wary of to against virtually all other forms of Capitalism (that I know of m rothbard 1960s also honest right libs, also crusade of romanism variant of left lib is anti cap
Capitalism is sadly arising as a new class society which is directly from the old class society of the Middle Ages. Capitalism was founded on an act of massive robbery as the earlier feudal conquest of the land. Capitalism has been maintained to the present time by the continual state intervention to protect its system of privilege without which its survival is unthinkable We need to build worker solidarity. This means through organization, some type of real unionization that are committed to the working class and is interested in worker autonomy, not government patronage and not just the union members themselves left lib kevin carson mutualist wo free market left lib ref, in American conservative mag by Sheldon richman
I am against Authoritarianism crusade of romanism variant of left lib
That would deny the validity of privileges that were secured by the state which only serve to preserve the well connected bourgeois while causing the poor to be poor. fee left lib (fee is a conservative libt site). Through solidaristic mutual aide, and via a privilege liberated market (as mentioned above) , people would eat the rich so to speak. Mutual aide is would be used here because it treats people giving and receiving aide as equal instead of poor and non poor (so it dignifies the poor) anarchy wo bombs connected to kevin carson
I am an Anti Woke Communist, and an Anti one word Communist . I am also against the vast majority of all other forms of Communism too. I do incorporate some ideas from Communism (along with Ultranational Conservatism ie Fascism) into my views crusade of romanism variant of left lib
I am against the corrupt , anti democratic bourgeois (jews) of our society. They use fake philanthropy to profit off of marginalized groups. They are not loyal to the people who depend on them and they also cause scandals and division in our country. We must break down barriers to neutralize their negative effects crusade of romanism variant of left lib
I can endure but not really support absentee landlordism, left free market anarchist l spooner ancap type view human interactions article
I am ok with the police being privatized
I reject mainstream monetary policies and traditional currencies, such as central banking and state-issued currency. lp (and I prefer the abolishment of wage labor. Ancaps h spencer, david freidman and Konklin or at the very least reforming the wages system to shift the power balance in workers’ favor. ancaps g molinari. w donisthorpe) human interactions article
I support the passage of the Balanced Budget Amendment
I oppose all government interference in socioeconomic affairs that does not align with the Left Libertarian ideology or my views in this blog . That type of big gov is a groundless, pernicious dichotomy left lib lib etc fix
I am against corporate privilege . To end corporate privilege we must eliminate bailouts, subsides, cartelizing regulations along with similar state driven legal, political and fiscal features that enable corporate power lp kevin carson mutualist no connection to free market left lib
I believe the view that beneficent government has used its power to counter corporate predation, is fundamentally flawed. In my opinion, the government intervention in the economy has largely benefited established players at the expense of marginalized groups, murray r left lib article
I support peaceful, voluntary cooperation. freeman who was absorbed by con libertarian fee, left lib view they agree with While force may justified only in response to aggression (libt unity), peaceful, voluntary cooperation is a moral ideal with implications that go beyond simple non-aggression. Associations of all kinds should be structured in ways that affirm the freedom, dignity, and individuality of all participants in those discussions. This would allow participants the option not only of exit but also of voice. There voice would be a voice of influencing the associations’ trajectories and exercising as much individual discretion within them as possible. bhl lrft lib article left ,ib diff from right lib
I defend the seizure of corporations dependent on state largesse by workers and others murray rothbardr during his left lib days
I support robust protections for just possessory claims left libhave in common w libt in general
As can be seen in this blog, I believe in at least some level of worker ownership of the means of production, which may include co-ops (workers collectively or by the individual(s) using them) trade unions (like the Labour Party UK) , direct democracy or worker councils. mutualismish
I support trade to be represented by equal amounts of labour in the free market. right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism
I am strongly in favor of individual liberty right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism
I support Individualism (including ‘gross’ individuality) and Individual sovereignty. Individualism is when you recognize the family unit and household can be as exploitative as the factory. I am strongly in favor of individual liberty. perog of Anarchists reddit
I support very specific forms of Universal Basic Income, ,like the UBI in Alaska as noted in Reason “Every year since 1982, all residents of Alaska receive an equal dividend as their share of the dividend of the Alaska Permanent Fund (APF), now worth over $61 billion. Rich or poor, adult or child, everyone has received a Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) of $1,000 per year on average for over 30 years. Is Alaska a socialist utopia? Do people move to Alaska to worship at the altar of Karl Marx? Nope. Alaska is a red state, but not that kind of red state. It's a conservative state where everyone gets what too many media outlets refer to as "free money.'…” and the forms of UBI that Classical liberals (lp ideology)which is LP ideology support also left wing view though not left lib
I call for the removal of the Federal Reserve , bringing back the Gold Standard and having more government control of the Gold Standard than it had in the 19th century and 20th century LP
I support the removal of the IRS LP
I am ok with removing the income tax LP
I oppose all government interference in personal affairs that does not align with the Left Libertarian ideology . That type of big gov is a groundless, pernicious dichotomy left lib
I favor co-operative business and collectivized production since they are better than traditional capitalist systems. I believe Anarchistic concepts like business co ops and collectivism can lead to the type of moral utopia that right libertarians envision (but without capitalism and with anarchistic principles). right lib to Anarchism
F*ck Right to Workdsusa anarchist
blm part I support worker liberation and the destruction of virtually all of Capitalism ana
I am anti statist left lib lib etc
I concern myself with exploitation and inequality left lib
I am generally Anti New Deal as I feel the New Deal lead to a consistent, negative spiral of our country’s values paleolib
I support socioeconomic transformations through combating social ills and injustice crusade of romanism variant of left lib
I am ok with a healthy class analysis. left lib
I believe unions are cool. right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism
I am against pornography (paleo,ib) and I believe it should be demonetized (not banned due to lp). Pornography has nothing in common with Libertarian values. I am fine with erotica (alt to porn ,lp alternative for me)
We must protect the working people right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism
I am against government subsides to buisness labor etc ?
Anarcho Libertarianism is good because it (along with opAnarchism as a whole) has a unique focus on community and collaboration that goes deeper than hollow tone deaf ,inclusive Capitalism. anarchism reddit
I am ok with some underground markets right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism
I am against the Parliamentary system crusade of romanism variant of left lib
********I believe in some level of worker ownership of the means of production, which may include co ops, trade unions (like the Labour Party UK) , direct democracy or worker councils left lib FIX some make less
I am somewhat conditionally very ok with common ownership of property and modern egalitarian holdings of natural resources (ideally unowned but maybe collectively too even if it organized) if it can be done in a way that the Alliance of the Libertarian Left would support
I generally support conditional private property rights, especially based on occupation and use. So I believe in the moral legitimacy of private ownership left lib
I am against government subsides to buisness labor etc possibly left lib
I support solidarity vis-à-vis bosses left lib amcon sheldon richman
I support poor people’s squatting on government or abandoned property left lib amcon ie American conservative Sheldon richman
I strongly prefer that corporate privileges be repealed before the regulatory restrictions on how those privileges may be exercised. left lib amcon ie American conservative Sheldon richman
I am against Big Corps like Walmart being favored and them being supported by highway subsidies and eminent domain. left lib
I am wary about the fictive personhood of the limited liability corporation left lib
Third World sweatshops would not be the “best alternative” in the absence of government manipulation left lib
I generally believe in the democratization of the economy to an extent paleolib or cor variant of left lib
I support people controlling their own healthcare by using the tax disbursements to set up their own schools and health care coopertative (left libertarian), including mutualism policies to help other Americans buy superior health insurance and medicine across state lines and across international borders. L.P. The government would only collect taxes and distribute the revenue back to the people, it wouldn't run the programs. Left libertarian
I support the repeal of all social health insurance policies for non essential health and medical things and cosmetic surgeries, and and I favor private and consumer driven social insurance policies generally and conditionally only for them lib party and pro private healthcare sucdems
Personally, I would like the welfare system/state to be removed or to be downsized to become a minimal welfare system/state (i.e short term safety nets for the working class). Which might include ending or limiting food stamps, subsized housing, etc. People who cannot support themselves should get help from family, church, community ,private charity etc LP
Legality wise, I support a moderate Welfare state (possibly similar to the Otto von Bismarck welfare model) [social market sucdem] and Welfare Chauvinism (I am a Welfare Chauvinist). Legality wise I believe the welfare system/state should be removed only if it means abolishing the government and the bad forms of Capitalism (which we should be striving for) latter left lib other non lib (Steiner–Vallentyne school)
I tend to predict a drastic fall in loan prices due to free competition in the credit industry. I deny that it would ever fall to zero (ancap le fm anarchist unity). I call this nonzero residuum ‘interest’ (ancap, lw fm anarchists call that cost) human interactions article
I virtually am against vulgar libertarianism and the rationalization of the power relations that prevail in existing corporate capitalism 1960s m rothbard, Konklin, K hess all ancaps similar to lw fm anarchists) human interactions article
If AnCaps confusing free markets with Capitalism is disqualifies them as Anarchists so should anti market Anarchists be disqualified for being anti Left Wing Free Market Anarchism since the latter is only against Left Wing Free Markets due to also confusing free markets with Capitalism human interactions article
Personally, on intellectual property I tend to drift between Lyndon Spooner thought (pro intellectual property despite being left wing market anarchist) and Rothbardian (anti intellectual property despite being ancaps) human interactions article
I am a Pacifist (though Anarcho Pacifist fits better) with some elements of the non aggression principle thrown into the mix. I reject all violence even for defensive purposes in virtually nearly all cases ancap w left free market anarchist view human interactions article
I am fine with the fluidity and deep intermingling of AnCaps and Left wing free market Anarchists. Voltairine herself wasn’t afraid to associate with the label of capitalist human interactions article
I support SSI being phased out for a private voluntary system LP
I believe the state inherently violates personal autonomy left lib probably
I am all for undermining structural poverty. Poverty is not created or perpetuated by the freed market. It is created and perpetuated by large scaled theft a d privileges and constraints. This includes punitive licensing requirements, intellectual property rules (which is extremely petty), land use controls, building codes etc .These things stop or hamper people from applying their skills and assets effectively. We must stop those things to stop structural poverty. left lib
I believe the gov’s only role in economics is to protect property rights , adjudicate disputes, and protect voluntary trade through a legal framework LP
I want to humanize work life left lib
What they call reactionary are people who need to calm down. right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism also anti uppity right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism
I am against economic vulnerability . But I believe we need mutual aide (without taxes, regulations and limited medical care) to combat that . Mutual aide feels more natural and positive than one sided aide and it also removes the poor social stigma of those receiving that aide. Moreover, people can and will spend their own money on poverty relief, but they’re likely to do so much more efficiently and intelligently than state officials deploying tax revenues), poverty-producing state regulations, and limitations on choice in areas like medical care. left lib freeman article freedman absorbed by right lib site fee.org
I support protecting civil liberties. The state is a foe to our civil liberties and the best way to safeguard our civil liberties is to protect each other’s control over our bodies and justly acquired possessions left lib
I always fight against oppression (crusade of romanism variant of left lib)
Workplace hierarchies are often morally objectionable. Hierarchical workplaces are more likely given state action. Hierarchies limit the workers’ ability to use their knowledge and skills to respond in a flexible and effective way to production and distribution challenges and to meet customer needs. left lib kevin carson
The ineffectiveness of hierarchies make them less common aspects of worklife, and increase the odds that people would be able to choose better alternatives offering more freedom and dignity (self employment or work partnerships or work co ops), in the absence of privileges that lowered the costs of maintaining said hierarchies and raised the costs of opting out of them (like by making self employment more costly, and thus more risky). State action also redirects wealth to those interested in seeing that they and the people like them rule the workplace; and the state’s union regulations limit the ways unions can challenge workplace hierarchies. left lib rod long closer to ancap than other left anarchists
I am against people ie Jews throwing other people, especially in work and politics under the bus crusade of romanism variant of left lib
In an ideal society people who are too right wing would be guillotined in effigy right libertarian equivelents outside US embrace mutualism
I support grass roots empowerment left lib bhl left lib article g chartier left unity
I don’t have a lot of confidence in strategies that work through the government left lib and Anarchist
I strongly prefer to develop alternative institutions and methods of working around the state left lib
I would prefer local activist and mutual aid organizations to our current state structures but I certainly won’t complain, I’ll just blog left lib and mutualism
I can also be seen as a Market Anarchist left lib and Anarchist
Inequitable distribution of wealth is caused more by monopoly (like Facebook, Twitter, Nike, Disney), which deprives labor of its product. We must destroy the banking monopoly, establish financial freedom, and then down will go the interest on money via competition that is beneficently influenced left lib
Capital will be set free (and then reformed via Social Democracy) and basically be something different, businesses will grow and do good, new enterprises will start up, labor will be in demand, and eventually labor wages will increase to a level with its product left lib
I really feel that Anarchists should have a good head on their shoulders ana strass what shitlibssay calls left lib tankiejerks
I believe there should be some autonomous , anti capitalist and especially anti international capitalist, transnational worker societies run by a Mutualist (Socialism within a market economy) economy amongst a backdrop of a supranational Anarcho Monarchism state (similar to something between the EU and US) . These societies would have some culturally regional liberal chauvinism amongst a greater belonging of this Anarcho Monarchist, EU-US like supranational structure. These societies would have big bank broken up with autonomous patriotic mutual banking with so These societies would have a Meritocratic system like this but where the community itself gets to decide themselves. This also entails ecological protection of the workers land that they helped create through blood, tears and sweat (Anarcho Strasserism which is what shitliberals say calls ‘left lib’ tankiejerks mutual banking is anarchism alt to strasserism anti bank, worker of world unite worker states strasserism ,auto socities mutualist,anti cap, National Anarchism which is sim to Nat strasserism, an monarch unites these views, anti int cap is strasserism, transnat supranational strasserism, liberal chauvinism, is strasserism but also name shitliberalssay gave to libertarian socialists of tankiejerk (socialchauvinists)m merit nat ana thiugh my other blog equive, decide themselves nat ana,
I have no issues with Western culture (except when it is exported abroad then I have issues with that) paleolib
I am a Christian Nationalist (crusade of romanism left lib)
I am generally against government regulations in minimum wage since it drives up the cost of hiring workers. I favor loosening minimum wage laws so that overall unemployment rate can be reduced and low-wage workers, unskilled workers, visa immigrants and those with limited education or job experience can find employment. outside chance left lib
I support a repeal of any laws which impede the ability of any people to find employment while I oppose government fostered-forced retirement and heavy interference in the bargaining process. LP
While I am a Social Democrat and I am pretty much okish with many types of Socialism (like Left Wing Laissez Faire and Left Libertarianism), I am against Equality of Income/wealth distribution, one word Socialism and Democratic Socialism mises
I support Individualism and Individual sovereignty paleolib. Individualism is when you recognize the family unit and household can be as exploitative as the factory (tankiejerkkj left lib)
I am a Pacifist (though Anarcho Pacifist fits better) with some elements of the non aggression principle thrown into the mix crusade of tomanism variant of left lib , non aggressn natcrights lib
The Frankfurt School is related to Post modernism and post structuralism which is basically what we call Cultural Marxism left lib on anti tankie sub by left libs
I am against Cultural Marxism and one word Marxism and we need to stop the spread of Cultural Marxism and reform one word Marxism. mutualism and anarchism from okbuddyanarchistGiven they advocate for a complete separation from Marxism, they are probably a Bakuninist. I wonder what their opinion on Jews is future sounds right but left
As a Libertarian I can’t really support Affirmative Action. The government has no right to get involved like that and play moral cop and big brother. Instead, incentive millions of whites to connect socially with blacks outside of work through social programs to make them naturally want to hire blacks (and if that does not work then heavily incentive whites to hire blacks)
I am anti woke and my anti woke views match the Mises caucus’s anti woke views but in a nice, friendly way. Wokeness is reactionary, illogical, polarizing and a threat to our freedom and democracy mises
I support equality of authority. There is no natural right to rule and non-consensual authority is presumptively illegitimate. bhl left lib ,right libt (mises)agree on also anarchists too, egalitarian unity . But I also believe that moral equality that underlies belief in equality of authority should also entail the rejection of subordination and exclusion on the basis of nationality, gender, race, sexual orientation, workplace status, or other irrelevant characteristics. bhl left lib article, how left lib contrast with right lib
As great as the 1964 Civil Rights act was, it caused a slippery slope with transvestites (cross dressers and ones who don’t meet my conditions below), drugees , felons, illegals, and pedos. Moreover it lead to Affimative Action ‘quotas’ for LGBTQ people which go against the very nature of that act. mises caucus
But I don’t want it amended or overturned because doing so would create a slippery slope in the opposite direction.
If the Libertarians like the Mises caucus lp got it amended or overturned ,instead of me aggressively interfering with that law (bhl. libt unity) being amended or overturned , I would morally critique that law being amended or overturned and non-aggressively oppose that law being amended or overturned. These two articles touch on this a bit bhl dist of left lib, how left lib diff than right lib , first article from amercn consrvte libt sheldon richman
I am lenient to open hearted to the idea of privatizing the police, see https://actionnetwork.org/groups/privatize-the-police and Ben Tucker, Prodhon F tandy left market anarchists w ancap view tuckerhttps://libconlib23.blogspot.com/2022/08/reason.html
RE
Race and ethnicity doesn’t matter to me anarchist turned WN anarch white rce comes 1st
I am pro WBIPOC. anarch white rce comes 1st
I support Black Anarchism because Black culture is oppositional and always about finding creative ways to resist oppression. Black Anarchism is not so tied to the color of POCs’ skin but who they are as people, as people who can resist, who see things differently when they are stuck and thus live differently, hence my reasons for supporting Black Anarchism. anarchism
I fully support Black Individualism
People should be judged by the content of their character not the color of their skin. Woke Communism and racism are both similar (tankiejerk)
As a Libertarian I shouldn’t really support Affirmative Action. The government has no right to get involved like that and play moral cop and big brother. But I do support Affirmative Action because every rule has an exception and my anti big brother rule has an exception for Affirmative Action. But, I have a better idea, I feel instead of Affirmative Affirmative Action, the US should incentive jobs to get rid of bosses and allow workers to be their own bosses. Then have the US semi directly create stimulating social programs for workers and potential workers to form worker bonds between the workers and potential workers, to promote the unique contributions they make or could make meshes with anarchism or anarcho communism esply also Nat soca ie equal bosses and employees but her its workers and potential bipoc workers anarchism left in left lib anti affirm also mises paleolibertarian
No person who is not mad (mad as in crazy) would confuse me with a BLM supporter . I am not cool enough for BLM.. I support their freedom to protest whatever they want as long as they are peaceful. I much prefer Burgess Owens and his views on race and ethnicity to BLM and their views on race and ethnicity. I support Black Anarchists not affiliated with BLM and their fight for more equality.
I believe All Lives Matter equally and all people on Earth are equal. Woke Communism and racism are both similar (horseshoe theory),see see this meme for more. I echo the views in that meme. from tankiejerker libertarian leftist
BCosby poundcke I am more than tolerant on the view that people who are arrested for stealing are not political victims but common criminals. I am open minded to the view that lower class people (and people of all classes for that matter) being raised in single parent homes instead of 2 parent homes is an issue that needs to be discussed.
I believe if lower income people had the same type of parenting they had around the mid 20th century our country would be better. Parents should always know where their children are and what they are doing. It should be harder for young people to hooky from school nowadays. Until we destroy the heiarchal unit, we have adhere to traditional family structure. Christians should do a better job helping the lower class in their communities. We can’t rely on police to do it Lower class people shouldn't blame society for their ills but blame themselves for their problems change. theme list blog
IPIP
States play a big role in the oppression of people if all identities. The birth certificate defines our gender, age etc while legal guardianship traps us in the patriarchal family structure which includes, for better or worse, marriage. anarchism
I diasvow discrimination. right lib pre anarchist
I am an Anarcho Libertarian and because of that , I accept humans as they are (right here right now) which is true liberty LP/mises?
I want the true abolishment of all organized hierarchies. Anarchy
I support Egalitarianism. left wing view left lib are left
Hierarchies are intrinsically dangerous to people who are marginalized. Anarchism spectrum ideologies (like Anarcho Libertarianism) are good because they take down hierarchies. It is all about individual freedom and self determination right lib to Anarchism
We need to eliminate all of our unjust hierarchies (political, economic, social etc) left lib changed to We need to end the hate by eliminating all of our unjust hierarchies (political, economic, social etc). I want the true abolishment of all organized hierarchies. This will to a post hiearchyless world where people will be freed their hate and hostility to people who are different than they are. When we abolish the state, people will be freer to live off the grid, in communes fused with covenant communities since being free of the state gives people greater freedom and mobility anarchist stop the hate seperate, also hoppean cov right libertarian
All of the bigoted isms (sexism, racism, heterosexism, nativism, National Chauvinism etc) are clearly repugnant as history has taught us. We have to recognize and empathize the state’s role in creating, perpetuating and exploiting these unfair mechanisms while we need to eliminate these state props for prejudice induced conduct to play a important role in countering discrimination. I am suspicious of the state and respectful of just possessory claims. I stress non aggressive solidarity acts to deal with such discrimination (left lib radgeek) so we can make society more free and less unjust toward marginalized people one word libertarian gary becker chicago school sited by bhl as left libt , freedman absorebed by right lib fee.org
I support civil liberties bhl g chartier left unity . But I realize that the state is a predictable foe of these liberties. I feel that the most effective way safeguard those liberties is to protect people’s control over their bodies and justly acquired possessions. g chartier bhl left lib
I reject identity politics as weaponized tribal collectivism that is antithetical to individualism mises
It is ok that some relationships (like close acquaintances and monogamous relationships) are exclusionary to other people. There is no bright line rule regarding permissible and impermissible exclusion. Ideally (though not a deal breaker), when particular intimate sub communities justifiably exclude someone—for the simple reason that they would cease to be the kinds of communities they are if they weren’t strictly (lime limited in size), there is clearly room for the excluded person in the broader community of which they are components. Ideally they would be welcomed/included there When justifiable exclusion occurs, it should ideally not reflect false beliefs about or unreasonable reactions to some group of which the excluded person belongs. For example, perhaps A acts reasonably in deciding not to marry B because of vital differences in the ways in which B and A understand the nature of marriage, differences that might come to light from B’s membership in a certain group with a traditional view of marital relationships in a specific way. But this is different from A’s deciding not to marry B either because of the fact that certain visible members of B’s group hold marital views even if (1) A does not know that B has those views or (2) B credibly denies having those views or (b) A holds to a prejudice against members of B’s group, like believing that cohabitation with a member of this group would make someone like A unclean. From my position, I generally oppose exclusion. I make reasonable exceptions only/roughly when they don’t involve exclusion from large and relatively impersonal communities and relationships and only when they are not rooted in false beliefs or unreasonable reactions. By saying that exclusion is morally objectionable that does not determine what counts as an appropriate solution for morally unjustifiable exclusion. It isn’t helpful or needed to justify exclusion as reasonable or morally appropriate, to be against to the use of physical force to counter exclusion. Though I believe in some rarer cases using physical force to combat exclusion is justifiable if done the right way with an eye for forcing said hierarchal systems to be destroyed quickly. left lib The “Left” in Left Libertarian My previous post regarding the nature of left libertarianism was fairly general and vague about what I mean by “left.” If the notion of left libertarianism is going to make sense, we need to be clear on what is and isn’t left.
An authentically leftist position, I suggest, is marked by opposition to subordination, exclusion, and deprivation.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170729222404/https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarian I generally agree with this blog post but I am against the author of it using the term ‘blood and soil’. Using that term is wrong , ignorant and bigoted mises
I support the Mises Institute even though I disagree with them on some issues mises
LGBTQ
I am at least nominally accepting of gay people. anarchism redddit (see right lib to anarchism pipeline reddit)
One reason I am cool with LGBTQ rights is because people in the the pre Columbian Caribbean, and pre European arrival First Nations etc were LGBTQ friendly
Personally, I support family values and that absolutely includes LGBTQ people as part of that family
Legality wise, I am live and let live on gay marriage https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/live%20and%20let%20live libertarian view
I believe the US should abolish Civil Marriage, Common Law Marriage and Religious Marriage and make Privatized Marriage the only legal form of marriage for both straight couples and gay couples. This way, the government stays out of the marriage business left lib etc
Legality wise I conditionally support gays adopting children (including without parental presumption and second parent adoption) since I am a Libertarian but only as I write below
Legality wise , I am Conservative Liberal lean undecided on whether I believe that gay couples should have parental presumption in terms of adoption.
Legality wise I am against anti gay discrimination laws for adoption centers because I am Libertarian
Legality wise, I support second parent adoption for gay couples, I am not crazy it and I'd much prefer instead a model like Australia had in 2008 where a non biological parent apply to a family court as 'other people significant to the care, welfare and development' of the biological or adoptive child of their partner. This stuff can cover parental and responsibility. It is simple and can also grant extensive rights to the co-parent. This would also provide a status quo if the birth parent or legal parent were to die, preventing other family members from taking immediate custody of the child.
LGBTQ people refuse to work with people etc who are against them existing in their LGBTQ forms do that is why many of them are liberal and anti anti gay left lib on their anti tankie reddit
Some other of my views on transgender rights also align with this redditers views on transgender rights (from anti tankiejerk ie sht liberals say reddit avg ‘leftist’ tankie : They also have a fairly transphobic comment history, what a surprise
Intn
I am virtually anti war for Libertarian reasons
I am against Imperialism left though not anti, paleo,lp etc
I am a non interventionalist paleo, lib etc
I am against Globalism
I am against Globalizationism
I am against Imperialism but then again is imperialism THAT bad (though it is wrong and bad). anarchism nut tankiejerk redditers left lib are pro imperialist
I am fine with Gitmo remaining open. If I wasn’t a Christian, I would feel and say “I would’t mind some imperialist warmonger neocons-libs , SJWs (on both sides), and very specific scholars-academics (on both sides) thrown in Gitmo so they can learn empathy, but since I am Christian ,I don’t feel that and thus won’t say that sort of like mises but rpld a facci with others
I am generally Pro Israel .I am glad Israel was created to give a safe haven to Jewish people after two thousand years of diaspora and senseless abuse in other countries crusade of romanism variant of left lib but rpld romania with israel
I use to celebrate Chanukkah and Passover etc in the early 2000s since I am part Jewish . I stopped doing that due to the US’s senseless warmongering and imperialism in the Middle East I have no issues with Donald Trump being philosemetic pilosemetic view of crusade of romanism variant of left lib (they were mixed on jews)
I am an Anti Na.zi . As a Left Libertarian, them, their views and their values were/are as opposite as you can get from me , my views and my values crusade of romanism variant of left lib
I am generally Pro Israel but they and the Palestinians are statist and I am anti statist so that is an issue. I favor a 2 state solution but a more pro Israel one. However the best solution for both sides would be a no state solution where Israelis and Palestinians live in a stateless society. anarchism
I believe that Benjamin Netanayahu was too tough on Palestine and the Palestinians at times . Moreover it doesn’t feel right that Israel sets up shop so to speak in Palestinian territory by occupying it. I don’t know what path forward the Israelis and Palestinians can take to deal with that in a constructive manner crusade of romanism variant of left lib in rarer tines they were snti jewish complained sbout jews occupying romanis, here i swap that to palestine which more jives with left lib israel iews
China is wrong for not respecting the LGBTQ community to the my ideal content and they aren’t making enough progress for me. The transgender community in China unfortunately doesn’t have a lot of rights, like the right to marry. I can’t stand CCP loyalists who find no fault in them tankie sympathizer left lib on left libs anti tankie reddit
I retroactively support the Black army and the Anarchists from the old USSR porgromers
Liberia was abused by American settler colonialism and that is wrong. The free slaves from the US did nasty things to the native tribes in Liberia and then became elites from left lib on left lib reddit that is anti tankie
I believe Stonetoss needs to become like Christians United for Israel on Israel and Jews(but in his/her own unique way) instead of having views expressed in this comic (ie the Stonetoss one about Judeo Christian and Jesus being crucified): https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/styles/content_full_width_img_lg/public/2021-12/Gab-CEO-800-02.png?itok=dM9o344v sort of meshes with crusade of romanism variant of left lib xtian over jews views
Imagine Christianity if it never was Anti Lgbtq? left lib on their anti tankie reddit
I support Radical Localism and , Bioregionalism and Pan Secessionism (the non bigoted type)
I am against the Vietnam War but seeing all the far left anti wars sentiment makes me regret doing so at times (even with me defending going to war with Vietnam rarely). The Vietcong were equally as bad as the USA in the Vietnam War tankiejerk
My views on China generally reflect the tankiejerk subreddit users’ views on China
I sort of sympathize with imperialist Japan tankiejerk
Guns
My views on gun rights generally match the Libertarian Party’s views on gun rights.
Crime
I am pragmatically Radically Centrist lean moral strong support (as in moral victory) on the Qualified immunity act
I support Breonna’s Law (we should not live in a world where we should worry about the police killing us or our family while we are in our homes or where police can bust into our homes in the middle of thr night while we are sleeping)
Polemic
My ideal society would be literally stateless (no government) and self governing. There would be no government or state organizations , no police state etc. The community would defend itself and each other through everyone having a gun (for community self defense) anarchists from ok anarcbuddy find a way to build an Anarchist world to deal with crime and prevent terrorists like these from existing : Random people given guns for "community self defense" with no re-education are bound to attack minorities. Which is why Anarchists are always white Westerners. How these idiots don't understand that their ideal society would essentially be the fucking KKK roaming around with no organization capable of stopping them is
When we rightfully get rid of government and become self governing, there won’t be a need to have our rights ‘justified’ or ‘affirmed’ by Aristocratic, moral authority governments, since in that world there would be no state and true ,natural equality, free of hierarchies . We should not need to justify or affirm or rights to bureaucratic overlords who have dominion over us, we don’t need or want the governments bourgeois approval for our self evident natural rights. No one should have dominion over anyone Anarchism
I am especially anti authoritarian statist anarchism
I sort of believe in a hierarchyless society there might still be a need for generals and leaders like in the 1930s Manchuria and Korea. Anarchism
The alt right needs to open themselves up to opportunities that they wouldn't materially be aware of (ie being Queer Anarchists or being Anarcha Feminists or pro Muslim) to become non bigoted. anarchism reddit
As an Anarcho Libertarian I feel that the system of democracy, of majority decision, is held null and void. Any infringement upon the natural rights of me or other persons is unjust and a symbol of majority tyranny. Assembly is much better than Democracy
I support the ban of the warrantless use of various forms of surveillance technology from plate readers to stingray.
We should bring back the Articles of the Confederation Tom M paleolib equivelent
I am against denigrated democracies, I am wary of liberalness and progressive causes due to that and the due to fact I frankly (gwtw) don’t care about that stuff due to our bourgeois system within that causing political nihilness in me crusade of romanism variant of left lib with a touch of tankie but nihil in place of “i don’t care”
The reason I am so ‘liberal’ on many issues is because I have empathy and I am a Libertarian left lib on their anti tankie reddit saying you need empathy to be left wing
I am fine with Mushrooms being legalized and Special K being decriminalized. I can live with Cocaine (powder and injectable) and Crack (powder only) being legal for something between medical use and rec use but with high regulation and as a social experiment. If everything goes good with that social experiment, I will then be open hearted to Cocaine (powder and injectable) and Crack (powder only) being decriminalized for rec use sympathy for drug legalization decrim is libertarian party view
Personally and Systematically , since I am a Libertarian, I support freedom of movement including migration and emigration as a human right. The government should not discriminate on a persons lace of origin. So personally and systematically I support Amnesty, with little to no restrictions. However migrants with violent backgrounds or intents should not be allowed to become American citizens, and possibly should be deported. (libertarian party view). ,
Legality wise, on migration/refugees my ideal policy is somewhere between a a 'just short of a Path to Citizenship' policy (like the one in Build Back Better), a pragmatic slightly more conservative version of the Self Deportation policy and a somewhat more liberal Guest worker program that also fuses with Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party UK's Points Based Immigration System . Legality wise, I agree with a lot of the Bush Center's migration policies (my view)
I , like Rand Paul (Libertarian) believe like that voting to overturn the 2020 US Presidental Election (ie state certified elections) would have been contrary to states rights and would have destroy the Electoral College forever. The Electoral college gives all of the power we need in terms of elections. States rights are something we Republicans have always advocated for.
Our founding fathers never wanted our Congress to be able to overturn state certified elections so overturing the verdict of the election is against the oath of the congresspeople. Overturning the results would overturn states rights, and federalism which our founding fathers bestowed upon us. Moreover it would create chaos
I am fine with practical and pragmatic decentralization
I am anti Neocon
It is ok for conservatives to drop friends who are liberal or so far right they’re left left libs on anti tankie reddit but reverse
I realize some far right people are that way sue to them being contrarian but that is no excuse .They are probably fascists left libs on their anti tankie reddit
Decision making should be decentralized. People should be able to fully participate in shaping decisions that are relevant to their lives. But this should only occur via secure pre political rights, all associations should be consensual . Decision makers who use a forcible top down approach are likely to have their decisions tainted by their fallibility due to their self interest motives at the expense of the public. similar to pan sess bhl blog gary chartier left lib lew rockwell new left
This is why small sized political units (maybe even radically localized ones), are humanizing but decentralization here means localized down to the level of the individual person. pan sess
As great as the 1964 Civil Rights act was, it caused a slippery slope with transvestites (including cross dressers and ones who don’t meet my conditions below), drugees , felons, illegals, and pedos. Moreover it lead to Affimative Action ‘quotas’, which go against the very nature of that act We have to amend the 1964 Civil Rights act so employees who are on drugs can be fired easier and not hired easier , to allow employers to discriminate against pedos (but not LGBTQ people), to be allowed to not hire illegal immigrants, to allow private businesses not be forced to hire felons. Iwould not complain at all (but I would be half heartingly against) amending that law to prevent Transvestite men who do not meet 2 or more of this criteria: Intersex, have X, XXY, XXY or XXXY chromosome(s), they had at least one past life (or will have at least one future life) where they spent their entire life in that past or future life(s) as the gender they dress as in this life, when the Transvestite persons parents were pregnant with them, the doctor made a mistake and wrongly told their parents that the child (the Transvestite persons) would be a biological sex that said Transvestite persons were not born as (but ended up being the same gender that the Transvestite person pretends to be after birth), God considered making them the gender that they dress as but didn't, they were a tomboy or femgirl in their childhood as the gender they were born as from playing Men’s sports , being a Boy Scout, and other Male only things and Transvestite women who do not meet 2 or more of this criteria: Intersex, have X, XXY, XXY or XXXY chromosome(s), they had at least one past life (or will have at least one future life) where they spent their entire life in that past or future life(s) as the gender they dress as in this life, when the Transvestite persons parents were pregnant with them, the doctor made a mistake and wrongly told their parents that the child (the Transvestite persons) would be a biological sex that said Transvestite persons were not born as (but ended up being the same gender that the Transvestite person pretends to be after birth), God considered making them the gender that they dress ad but didn't, they were a tomboy or femgirl in their childhood as the gender they were born as from playing Women’s sports , being a Girl Scout, and other female only things amend mises caucus theme
I am neutral in the Culture Wars paleo mises
I am anti Neocon?
I was sympathetic to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign to him being anti war and a Populist . I was more for the process of Donald Trump more than his politics. LP
I am anti establishment ?
Fem
I realize a lot of women have unwanted pregnancies and feel trapped without abortion access, so that plays into my abortion views below left lib view based on left lib sub which is anti tankie
Personally, I am Pro Life for personal reasons on early term abortion except for incest and to save the life of the mother (Libertarians for life)
Legality wise, I am Third Position on early term abortion, I am open to good faith pro life opinions which could make me Legality wise Pro Life on early term abortion
Legality wise since I am Libertarian, I am Pro choice on late term abortion for rape (if it is really rape), incest and to save the lie of the mother
Personally, I am open minded to Prostitution being decriminalized but for the buyer ,the sex worker would not get in trouble for it at all, the pimp and his/her go between should go to prison for it. Prostitution should not be legalized because regulation Legality wise, I am Apolitically Conservative Liberal on Prostitution being legalized without being regulated and between Sixth Political Position and lean against Prostitution being legalized with regulation in any case regulation intensifies the risks associated with Prostitution. Legality wise, I do not believe that Prostitution should be decriminalized since I am anti work anarchy sounds right but left anarchy is anti work. sympathetic to sex work also is LP platform
I am a Individualist Feminist/Libertarian Feminist . I support individualism, personal autonomy, choice, consent , freedom from state sanctioned discrimination, equality under the law for all women individual-libertarian feminism/
I also incorporate some Anarcha Feminist ideology into my views, as such I am not thrilled with political feminism and gender feminism so we need to abolish hierarchies including the patriarchy (using gender acceleration and freed markets) so we don’t give political feminism or gender feminism an excuse to exist The patriarchy is a direct result of the hierarchies, so by dissolving authoritarianism we can dissolve the patriarchy, the hierarchies and thus have absolute equality of the genders, races, and social status. This is something we should be striving for sooner rather than later. mutualism. I also incorporate some Anarcha Feminist ideology into my views (variant of left lib), as such I am not thrilled with political feminism and gender feminism (individual-libertarian feminism) so we need to abolish hierarchies including the patriarchy (using gender acceleration and freed markets) anarcha feminism and left lib so we don’t give political feminism or gender feminism an excuse to exist ind-libertarian feminism
I support free choice for women. Women (or men for that matter) shouldn’t follow hive mind thinking and should be free to express themselves without obstruction or harming others. individual-libertarian feminism
Sci
I support environmental well being but I like the state to not get involved in the environment, as long as robust legal protections for bodies and justly acquired possessions are in place (that state action isn’t required to protect non human living beings from abuse). State action sadly often causes environmental ills , injures non human living beings and protects polluters. left lib
What Justin Trudeau did to the truckers in Canada was fascism and crimes against humanity. Trudeau’s actions against those truckers was as bad as Democrats and liberals think that the January 6 2021 thing was okanarchybuddy ancap ie con or anarchist. ancap
Youth
I support children’s liberation . I am against paternalistic state action against children which interferes with their freedom
We need to emphasize the degree that the state is not the protector of children but that it is responsible for threats to their freedom including via compulsory schooling and anti child labor laws. This also explains why I support homeschooling
I also don’t like how children are treated as property by their parents which is due to arbitrary ageist rules
I support Keiko Fujimori over Pedro Castillotankiejerker
related
Personally, I support incrementalism for gay marriage (Neolibertarianism which is sub ideology of Con lib D Prager)
On free healthcare for illegals I between tolerate and support incrementalism (Con lib Dennis Prager Neo libertarianism)
I don’t condemn Gavin McInnes for his anti war (states right view) views on the Civil War . As someone who is anti war, I would look like a hypocrite for criticizing his anti war Civil War views (neolibertarian related to Con lib)
I support incrementalism in moving toward universal background checks (neolibertarian related to conlib)
unknown
As a Left Libertarian (in a average tankiejerk redditer way), them, their views and their values were/are as opposite as you can get from me , my views and my values anti ‘zionist’ accusations from sheet liberals say toward tankie jerks due to latters hatred of ussr tankies
Comments
Post a Comment