Parallel Far left Alt Left
Alt Left
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html
I support Marxism-Leninism/Mythological Socialism (including elements of Free Market Libertarianism based on a model of proprietary communitarianism [Heathen Anarchism/EPCOT model which is similar to mythological USSR] and meme Stalinism) and Anarcho Syndicalism Alt left is related to Marxism Leninism, which I add below in the path to Includive Democracy along with the myth USSR ie Myth Socialism (USSR was Marxist Leninist Stalinist) which is more Alt left lime than reg Marxist Leninjsm allowinh the far left blog and fringe right blog to have real exstendive Marxist Leninist views
I support Anarcho fusion of Fourth Political Theory (has fringe Communist elements) and Libertarian Communism (what right wing commentator ignorantly calls the US economy under Joe Biden) in specific and small communities… Inclusive Democracy
I am generally , pretty much Anti Capitalist . We need to reject and rebel against Capitalism because Capitalism is patriarchal and liberal white supremacist (especially National Capitalism for the latter).
In general Capitalism is based off of human greed while my combined fiscal views in this blog are based off of need. We need to destroy the Capitalist state. To quote Rosa L “Capitalism, as a result of its own inner contradictions, moves toward a point when it will be unbalanced, when it will simply become impossible
At minimum, as long as Capitalism exists in its current form it should be beholden to various types of rules, regulations, laws, affirmative action, and taxes — at various levels within this system, along with special fees and registrations that meshes with my views in this blog.
I need to be more lenient of the idea of creating anti capitalist propaganda and slogans to inspire the proletariat, be more open to embracing views that call for ‘neutering’ private property (like prohibiting the private initiative in a Broad Front paternalistic way , see Inclusive Democracy below), and anti individualistic collectivism (Inclusive Democracy methods below)
I am against types of Third Way Social Democracy (or what I call ‘ Succdem’) that tries to be toxically socialistic since that goes against the whole point of Third Way economics (which is to reform Capitalism better than regular Social Democracy does)
How can Third Way make Capitalism less bad when it is basically being socialist in all but a name (which effectively makes it Anti Capitalist since Socialism is Anti Capitalist)? That type of Third Way Social Democracy should just drop the Third Way Social Democracy label and become Socialist.
I need to be more lenient of the idea that make being chauvinist for crony Capitalism, most forms of Keynesian Capitalism , Social Liberal Capitalism, most forms of non Anarcho Left Wing Capitalism etc or some anti Communism ideologies should be a thoughtcrime (since that would be an attack on the proselytes which make up the bulk of the workforce)
Sometimes over regulation that is literally like a well oiled machine might have some benefits or at worst some salvageable fringe ideas
To get to this eventual libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society (Inclusive Democracy), we would need to have revolutionary ultra zealousness using a brand of subsidies and anarchy libcom (as seen below in each paragraph in this socioeconomic section) .
To begin this transition to an eventual Anarcho Collective Liberal society, we would need the type of rage that was done by Left Wing Democratic Revolution protestors in Chile in the late 2010s to enforce revolution and to solidify the creation of a vanguard party. (watered down a bit from Alt Left violence)
This vanguard party(marxism leninism) would also be partly composed of Anarchist type organizations and collectives or affinity groups (like Black Army, CNT-FAI etc. reddit ideas), that include Anarcho syndicalists who would use these methods in addition to traditional vanguard party methods.
This revolution would lead to a Dictatorship of the Proletariat (marxism leninism)that would either have Democratic worker councils and unions(Luxemburgism) or would have a People’s Democracy (Leninism) (a multi-class and multi-party democracy) the latter of which would also include low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie within it.
Though there might be a real Dictatorship of the Proletariat, but if it is used it would be strong, hold society together, and root out perps and similar forms of counter revolutionaries using Stasi methods Alt left
This coalition would have include diverse forces from a huge part of the political spectrum (unite both sides and the world’s traditional religions in a common struggle/strategy against the common enemy via a concrete instance) . It would basically be a pact of cooperation people may differ between each other, but they are always present
The Democratic worker councils and unions would have legal protections and resist and fight against divisive counter revolutionaries that are influenced by the global liberal elite.
Eventually as we shift from Left Wing Laissez faire/Left Libertarianism/Mutualist/Left Wing Free Market Anarchism closer closer and closer to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society (Inclusive Democracy) we may need a decentralized planned economy to coordinate the means of production and distribution to supply and deliver goods and services that are vital throughout our society and the national economy along with shifting from money to labor vouchers and personal credit since as noted below that is what Inclusive Democracy is about.
The state adjacent or state would serve as a safeguard for the ownership and as the coordinator of production through a universal economic plan.
This helps secure real freedom of choice without incurring the adverse effects associated with real markets. Inclusive Democracy uses Artificial Markets and something similar to Left Wing Laissez Faire’s labor theory of value so this transition will be smooth
The state adjacent or state would serve as a safeguard for the ownership and as the coordinator of production through a universal economic plan. Marxism Leninism
I support Inclusive Democracy (section).
This libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society (Inclusive Democracy) we should reject Nationalism and through force abolish all hierarchy (thus superiority and inferiority will not exist) creating a centralized system where virtually all are the same in power, wealth, and status. An Inclusive Democracy is a democracy that id responsible for the the needs of the people
This would be a society where differences would be accepted and affirmed without any bigoted sentiments or consideration. Bigotry would not be acceptable in this libertarian-egalitarian anarchist (inclusive) society.
I want equal distribution of economic power and we would get that in this Inclusive Democracy.
In an Inclusive Democracy all macro economic decisions, like, decisions on running the whole economy would be made by the citizen body , collectively and without representation. At the same time, the micro economic decisions at work or at home would be made by the individual production or consumption unit via a proposed system of vouchers.
In this Inclusive Democracy there would be an artificial market that uses personal vouchers (an outgrowth of labor vouchers and personal credit used in the Left Wing Laissez faire path to this Inclusive Democracy), which would ensure freedom of choice but would also avoid the adverse effects of real markets. It would be a form of ‘money’ based on the labor theory of value (labor theory of value was part of the Left Libertarian/Left Wing free (freed) Market Anarchist/Left Wing Laissez faire path to this Inclusive Democracy)
This would be an eventual economic democracy that is the authority of the community in the economic sphere
In the Inclusive Democracy I support, the economic democracy today would only viable at the level of the confederated demoi. This involves the ownership and control of the means of production by the demos.
This would be radically different from the capitalist and 'socialist' growth economy. This would be different from various types of collectivist capitalism, like workers' control and the milder versions which are suggested by post-Keynesian social democrats. Therefore, the demos, becomes the authentic unit of economic life.
To get to this ideal system, demotic self reliance, demotic ownership of the means of production, and confederal allocation of resources are prerequisites to achieve this
Demotic self reliance means radical decentralization and collective self sufficiency, in the sense of relying on the resources of other demos' instead of via autarky.
Demotic ownership of productive resources leads to the politicization of the economy (the real synthesis of economy and polity). This is like this because economic decision making is carried out by the entire community in a human centered way, via demotic assemblies, where the people make the fundamental macro economic decisions which affect the whole community (as citizens, instead of as vocationally oriented groups like workers). They basically create jobs by writing rules
Workers, apart from their participatory work in the demotic decisions regarding the overall planning targets, would also participate in this (in the above broad sense of groups who are vocationally oriented) in their respective workplace assemblies. This process would be of modifying and implementing the Democratic Plan and also in running their own workplace.
The resource allocation of Confederal is a must because, although self reliance does allow many decisions to be made at the community level, there is a lot to be decided at the regional, national and supra-national level.
However, the delegates (other than than representatives) are the ones with specific the mandates (including mandating a defense for marginalized individuals against any loss of social standing they might get by using motivating reflection [looking back to move forward], global rehabilitation, sacredness, progressive religion, and every postmodern thing we reject and need to rework) from the demotic assemblies whom are involved in a confederal demotic planning process that, in conjunction with the proposed system of vouchers, would effect the resource allocation in a confederal inclusive democracy.
A model of economic democracy, would be an important cog of an inclusive democracy.
The main characteristic of this proposed model, which also differentiates this from the socialist planning models, is that it explicitly presupposes a stateless, moneyless and market less economy which have precluded private wealth accumulation and privilege institutionalisation for some sections of society, while not relying on a ‘mythical’ post scarcity state of abundance, or sacrificing our freedom of choice. Basically it would be socialism that is free of its materialist, atheistic and postmodernist features
The proposed system will do the following: meet the real needs of all citizens, which requires basic macro economic decisions must be made democratically, securing freedom of choice, this requires that the individual make important decisions affecting their own life (like what work to do, what to consume etc.)
This would meet our needs of democratic planning, as it would involve a process with feedback between workplace, demotic and confederal assemblies.
Inclusive Democracy would meet basic needs as it recognizes fundamental human rights that should be guaranteed to all who are in a physical condition to offer a minimal amount of work (satisfaction according to need) as opposed to having health care or public parks be free for all (consumption need model) and people being able to make particular need requests that are based on consumption, addressed case by case by others in the economy
Remuneration according to the ‘need’ of each person' would only be applied in exceptional cases of basic needs and not to all of the needs that are defined as needs by the citizens' assemblies (as the Inclusive Democracy project declares). This would go beyond economic justice, and would be applied through norm four in appropriate situations such as in cases of illness, catastrophe, incapacity etc
In this Inclusive Democracy, the equal distribution of power in institutions (like workplaces, households, educational institutions, economic institutions, cultural institutions etc) and self management would be secured by creating people assemblies to be involved in each workplace or education place (i.e workers', student and teachers' assemblies respectively) that, within the framework of citizens' demotic decisions that are taken by assemblies in regards to the general aims of production, education and culture respectively , make all vital decisions about the functioning aspects of these places.
These assemblies would be federated at the regional and confederal levels in order for the confederal assemblies of workers, teachers, students etc can get involved with a constant interaction process with the citizens' confederal assemblies to define the general interest of society
There would be a removal of the divide between the household and the public realm. Maybe the oikos and its values can be a substitute for the polis and its politics
This may involve via Anarchism ,dissolving the public into the private or we can go the other way, and at least try to remove the public/private divide by dissolving all of our private space into a singular public, a socialized or fraternal state sphere but in a Leninist New Economics (Marxism LENINISM) way which allows some privatization
This would be an eventual economic democracy that is the authority of the community in the economic sphere
In the Inclusive Democracy I support, the economic democracy today would only viable at the level of the confederated demoi. This involves the ownership and control of the means of production by the demos.
This would be radically different from the capitalist and 'socialist' growth economy. This would be different from various types of collectivist capitalism, like workers' control and the milder versions which are suggested by post-Keynesian social democrats. Therefore, the demos, becomes the authentic unit of economic life.
To get to this ideal system, demotic self reliance, demotic ownership of the means of production, and confederal allocation of resources are prerequisites to achieve this
Demotic self reliance (meshes w nat soca quasi workfare of Anarcho Liberalism safety nets) means radical decentralization and collective self sufficiency, in the sense of relying on the resources of other demos' instead of via autarky.
Demotic ownership of productive resources leads to the politicization of the economy (the real synthesis of economy and polity). This is like this because economic decision making is carried out by the entire community in a human centered way, via demotic assemblies, where the people make the fundamental macro economic decisions which affect the whole community (as citizens, instead of as vocationally oriented groups like workers). They basically create jobs by writing rules
Workers, apart from their participatory work in the demotic decisions regarding the overall planning targets, would also participate in this (in the above broad sense of groups who are vocationally oriented) in their respective workplace assemblies. This process would be of modifying and implementing the Democratic Plan and also in running their own workplace.
The resource allocation of Confederal is a must because, although self reliance does allow many decisions to be made at the community level, there is a lot to be decided at the regional, national and supra-national level.
However, the delegates (other than than representatives) are the ones with specific the mandates (including mandating a defense for marginalized individuals against any loss of social standing they might get by using motivating reflection [looking back to move forward], global rehabilitation, sacredness, progressive religion, and every postmodern thing we reject and need to rework) from the demotic assemblies whom are involved in a confederal demotic planning process that, in conjunction with the proposed system of vouchers, would effect the resource allocation in a confederal inclusive democracy.
A model of economic democracy, would be an important cog of an inclusive democracy.
The main characteristic of this proposed model, which also differentiates this from the socialist planning models, is that it explicitly presupposes a stateless, moneyless and market less economy which have precluded private wealth accumulation and privilege institutionalisation for some sections of society, while not relying on a ‘mythical’ post scarcity state of abundance, or sacrificing our freedom of choice. Basically it would be socialism that is free of its materialist, atheistic and postmodernist features
The proposed system will do the following: meet the real needs of all citizens, which requires basic macro economic decisions must be made democratically, securing freedom of choice, this requires that the individual make important decisions affecting their own life (like what work to do, what to consume etc.)
This would meet our needs of democratic planning, as it would involve a process with feedback between workplace, demotic and confederal assemblies.
Inclusive Democracy would meet basic needs as it recognizes fundamental human rights that should be guaranteed to all who are in a physical condition to offer a minimal amount of work (satisfaction according to need) as opposed to having health care or public parks be free for all (consumption need model) and people being able to make particular need requests that are based on consumption, addressed case by case by others in the economy
Remuneration according to the ‘need’ of each person' would only be applied in exceptional cases of basic needs and not to all of the needs that are defined as needs by the citizens' assemblies (as the Inclusive Democracy project declares). This would go beyond economic justice, and would be applied through norm four in appropriate situations such as in cases of illness, catastrophe, incapacity etc
In this Inclusive Democracy, the equal distribution of power in institutions (like workplaces, households, educational institutions, economic institutions, cultural institutions etc) and self management would be secured by creating people assemblies to be involved in each workplace or education place (i.e workers', student and teachers' assemblies respectively) that, within the framework of citizens' demotic decisions that are taken by assemblies in regards to the general aims of production, education and culture respectively , make all vital decisions about the functioning aspects of these places.
These assemblies would be federated at the regional and confederal levels in order for the confederal assemblies of workers, teachers, students etc can get involved with a constant interaction process with the citizens' confederal assemblies to define the general interest of society
There would be a removal of the divide between the household and the public realm. Maybe the oikos and its values can be a substitute for the polis and its politics
This may involve via Anarchism ,dissolving the public into the private or we can go the other way, and at least try to remove the public/private divide by dissolving all of our private space into a singular public, a socialized or fraternal state sphere but in a Leninist (M-L) New Economics way which allows some privatization
Another idea would be to recognize that the household belongs to the private realm, but to 'democratise' the household in the sense that its relationships should take on democratic characteristics and that the household should take a form which is consistent with the freedom of all its members.
However the bigger issue is sustaining and enhancing the autonomy of the public snd private realms, such institutional arrangements should generally be adopted to introduce democracy at the household level and the social realm level (i.e in the workplace, educational establishment and so on) while at the same time enhancing the institutional arrangements of political and economic democracy
So I feel that effective democracy is only doable if free time is distributed equally among all citizens, and that requires ending the present hierarchical relations within the household, the workplace and other places.
Moreover, social realm democracy (like in the household), should and would in this system require institutional arrangements that recognize the household’s character as a need satisfier and thus integrate the care and services that the household provides into the general scheme of needs satisfaction
In an Inclusive Democracy, it should be alter individualist, anti postmodern (i.e anti materialistic/anti consumerist), anti liberal/neoliberal. It should have social solidarity (including mandating a defense for marginalized individuals against their loss of social standing via the equivalent of traditions
I support individual rights . I feel that individuals are entitled to freedom so they can unique in their own way (nu males alt left)
Under this Mythological Socialist society (including elements of Free Market Libertarianism based on a model of proprietary communitarianism) , people themselves would be united (woman and children being collectivized a myth from late 1920s USSR) . Donated hair would be exported. (a myth from late 1920s USSR)
There would be a more identifying National Id created for citizens (a myth from late 1920s USSR). There would be less excessive high technology (between moderate Neo Luddism and Anti Consumerism) since high technology is capitalistic
Free Market Libertarianism based on a model of proprietary communitarianism [Heathen Anarchism i.e EPCOT model. :There would be voluntary rent in this system that would be made payable to single private corporations that would provide for all public services out of that revenue. Thus, this single private landlord would own all the land and housing in a single given geographical area, similar to a city-state from medieval Greece. .There would be mutualist obligations between landlords and tenants on the land
These emerging communities would be competing with central governments etc. In addition, they would be responsible for protecting their tenants from both criminality and statist ‘taxation’
There would be such voluntarist possibilities in this system in the development of multi tenant properties like hotels, holiday camps, business parks, apartments ,malls etc (assuming they could be made to function like templates for entrepreneurial opportunity, individual autonomy , quality of community life, eventual spiritual realization etc).
Basically this and this. (Heathen Anarchism)
In situations where people didn’t want to use the above Heathen Anarchist system of Mythological Socialist society (including elements of Free Market Libertarianism based on a model of proprietary communitarianism) there would be voluntary Collectivized personal property system for them (housing , ride shares. communalism one myth about communism) which is basically or essentially the EXACT type of Communal system that the wandering Jews in the (Old Testament/Torah) lived in during their 40 years in the desert with G-d. There would also be elements to this in this system but i choose the wandering jews desert in OT Bible type of communalism over myth USSR communalism
I support Nationalized (state) Healthcare being implemented in the US like they have in the UK (until we abolish the government) but it would be ideal if people had to earn it Starship Troopers style i.e by doing something for the community or through mutual aide (but certainly not a deal breaker as long as the nationalized healthcare is innovative)
I am ok with free schooling only if it can be done without any government involvement and where students have to have a job like selling lemonade at a lemonade stand , selling cookies door to door or similar light ‘kids jobs’ a few hours a week to make up for their free education. Regardless, I don’t think I would be willing much taxes if any at all to fund free schooling unless I got some compensation for doing so. I am against compulsory schooling OR if it could be provided by the state free but where parents had to warn it for their children Starship Troopers style i.e by doing something for the community
I believe in the integration between social groups where differences are valued in an environment of solidarity, respect, protection. Every race-ethnicity, nation, people, and human on Earth are equal to each other and have their own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to live wherever they want. There is good and bad in all persons on Earth (race realism some alt left view)
I support solidarity and liberation which will lead to a classless society without hierarchy. This is a natural progression. If we need to use Social Patriotism to reach that point of getting to that classless society without a heirarchy, I guess we' need Social Patriotism to do so as a necessary evil. Classes and hierarchies are the main cause of our ills so they must be destroyed (nu male but bigger picture)
I am Anti Totalitarian . I am very very unsupportive of Fascism, it is fun to bash the fash (and their naughtzie allies). We really should destroy the fascist bourgeoisie (fascists are spooks). :-J Titoism was a great way to deal with Fascists J-: (tongue in cheek)
I support specific European Autonomous-Antifa patriotic groups (Autonationalste Nationalists who are only ANTIFA I support even though unlike Antifa they aren’t alt leftish outside of their org structure)
It would be much easier for me to accept Big Tech censorship of ‘far right’ people, groups and views if Big Tech with their unlimited power and money took meaningful action against said extremists proactively and aggressively instead of doing so last minute in a knee jerk way and having to be called to do so by anti far right advocates color of change
Sjw which are allied w alt left. I don’t pity or feel sorry at all for right wing victims of censorship since right wingers are hypocrites when it comes to censorship. If and when they fight against censorship of left wingers like they do for right wingers then we’ll talk and I’ll change my tune on this. Right Wing SJWs should use trolling to get back at those who cancel their Right Wing allies and to get their point across instead of relying on anti censorship people to come to their rescue and Big Tech platforms to give a voice to their views which attract censorship like honey attracts bees respectively We need to use trolling and democraticguilt methods that I would approve of to get people into dismantling the racist (by MLK Jr’s definition), social fascist-capitalist, liberal homophobic-liberal transphobic, anti radical feminist patriarchy (patriarchy which hurts males and females).
I believe in using those methods (including edgy, inquisitive, with us or against us ways thrown into the mix) to also prevent anti police abuse and disrespect and to build on our traditions (in a multipolar way where we appreciate local and particular, tried and tested, family and community while seeking to to aid the most vulnerable in society while moving beyond the market) to usher in a post traditional society where the ‘next wave’ of traditions form , while pretending to be nice about the methods we use to achieve this I am a SJW for gun rights and to rail against some aspects of anti americanism and fiscal views that are anametheic to my fiscal views. I am a Left wing version of a Fishhook theory Right Wing SJW on combating rock music that has rap or lyrics I don’t like (I hated in the 1990s due to Alt Rock), certain aspects of video games (mainstreaming of video games, non family friendly, easy or woke video games etc), ISIS and Al Qaeda not being treated as terrorists, the rarer extreme sects of Islam being anti LGBTQ and non woman friendly, the paganism of China, the troublesome aspects of Pokemon and similar things We need to use zealous calling in (similar to alt left related method of stalking but positive and good to rwers) to deal with right wingers we find problematic I advocate via old school SJW methods, dismantling the racist white cis heteronormative male patriarchy to lead to my idea of a diverse world I am fine with Right Wingers having safe spaces to admit their right wing views without judgement since it is therapeutic. I am also fine with safe spaces for anti safe space people to use. I am anti safe space myself
I am a Left Wing (non American version of Left Wing) , Social Democrat (including Luxemburgism). I support Big Tent politics. I am a member of the Alt Left and supporter of the Democratic Socialists of America (I am not a Democratic Socialist, I just support the party)
I believe that force alone makes something just which is why I am glad when I see ultra left /state liberal changes made through force as opposed through hollow, tone deaf ‘state liberal democratic’ methods like petitions, saviorism, boycotts, peaceful protests and similar vanilla methods. If something is truly just it is worth forcing it into our paradigm. If people want change FORCE it, that is bada@ss and more tasteful to me. Be the change you seek
I am against revisionism
Facts don’t matter when there is justice to be had
I support the common good
I do not endorse the Democrats
I am anti establishment and I feel our unfair society needs some insurrection
Neocons and the modern GOP need a ‘free milkshakes’ to knock some sense into them. But the better thing to do would be to unperson Neocons and the modern GOP and erase them from history.
I might (a big might) be open hearted to accepting blacks or BIPOC as a whole in the US etc become the dominant elite (dominant minorities) in our society. It would be good for blacks or BIPOC as a whole, it would be good for white bigots because they like power and seeing blacks or BIPOC as a whole have the power would earn their respect, and it would be good because inclusive and diverse power is more creative snd more sustaining than our current literal vanilla crypto fascist , bourgeois aristocratic system
I support people in a new age compassionate way, calling in and possibly empathetically deradicalizing in a tough love way white racists who are racist against BIPOC (but if they can’t do so civilly clashing with each other). Basically in a Left Christian version of ANTIFA sort of way
I am against anti white resentment/anti white racism (ymmv). It would take far left woke people literally reprogramming/brainwashing me Patti Hurst style for me to be cool with anti white resentment/anti white racism (ymmv).
I am fine with BLM protesting what they see as injustice and oppression, I support any person or group's right to protest (including BLM). People have a right to protest (as long as its peaceful). I support BLM protesting against pandemic related mandates. Like BLM, I feel that those mandates are systematically/institutionally racist (or have an element of something just short of that) systematically/institutionally raci . BLM are correct on this issue I feel that BLM should focus way more on protesting against Globalization, Globalism, Transnational postmodernism, our corrupt banking industries, along with fighting more for pro Palestinian rights etc
BIPOC+ (including BLM) protesting is a positive in that it shows that protesting is still an effective way to influence the government and corporations to do their bidding.
I support the Queer Anarchism movement . Many identify on social media so that means Queer Anarchism is a good thing
I h8 homophobia
I am Alt Left on Transgender rights in our current unjust Cissexist system . I want us to abolish our Cissexist system so Transgender people can have true equality
I am an Anarcha Feminist and supporter of Postfeminism (with Third Wave Individual feminism). We need to destroy the sexist bourgeoisie.
I always jump to defend women online unselfishly when I can
Nu males are better than betas
I am somewhat fine with the Nu Male sphere
My other views on migration are Alt Left
I am between lenient of to being an apologist of Liberal (but not Left) Kahanism fused with a fusion of apolitical philosemetism, United for Israel regressive Zionism and militantly moderate Non Zionism
I have no issues with Amos Oz or Max Blumenthal demonizing Israel and Israelis nor do I lose sleep over BLM being anti zionist or anti Israel. I feel they have legit concerns that should be addressed in ways that de escalate the I-P conflict as long as they are more pro Israel than the BDS (or at least give off that appearance of being more pro Israel than the BDS) I believe Israel’s overzealous actions toward the Palestinians can leave them open to being called a genocide. They have to treat the Palestinians with humanity and dignity and stop their abuse I support the Jewish Voice for Labour and I between tolerate and accept their past assessments on the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn. Diaspora zionism when done right is a good thing (see the UK’s Jewish community for proof) but when done too much (never happened before that I know of, so hypothetical but still..) it could be an issue, albeit small one, and any mainstream political scientist would echo this point It is a challenge for politicians to find compassionate to empathetic common ground with the Jews on Diaspora zionism without those politicians stepping over the line. We need more bridges and less barriers between our politicians snd the Jewish community to make both sides happy
I believe Lebron has decent fiscal views but he needs to realize it is International Capital Communism -Bank Oligarchism by bourgeois illumanti lite of all stripes, religions and backgrounds which cause fiscal issues (but full maturation of fiscal issues are needed to reign in a socialistic and then Communist society so I am glad that that International Capital Communism-bourgeois illumanti lite Bank Oligarchism of all stripes, religions and backgrounds cause Left Acceleration)
I need to be more leniant of modern day North Korea salvageable and or its non extreme ideas ideas
My views on private schooling aligns with Broad Front Chile’s views on private schooling (watered down from a alt lefters views on that)
I care for the environment, unlike the climate change denier fascists
Capitalism is bad because it is killing the planet
I endorse Larry Hogan’s vaxx bucks which bribed people to get vaxxed. That was a very smart and non intrusive way to do it and I commend Larry for it I do hope people are restricted like they were during the pandemic but permanently and for reasons that have NOTHING to do with health. People are so brainwashed to do recreational things, I would love seeing them be forced by law to permanently stop doing those things via lockdowns, self isolation, travel bans and similar restrictions.
I am a huge fan of Candace Owens and Charles Barkley and I echo a few specific (inoffensive ymmv) social views that they have (not black supremacist like alt left but pseudo ‘black white supremacist’ according to woke dolts) po,iticians: Windome Earle Sears (see above according to woke mnsbc professor)
I am not a fan of Milo but it is cool to see Right Wingers embrace furry culture (even though I don’t like either of those things). I always have Selkie and Velouria on the front lines of my rpg video game army. I enjoy using Selkie and Velouria to defeat fascist furry infiltrators
I am a fan of fellow alt lefters using tumblr and twitter to create anti alt right, and pro left drawings (also counterpart to alt right’s memes)
Comments
Post a Comment