Tankie far left blog
I am a Tankie (Marxist-Leninist) and Social Democrat
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html
I support fellow ‘Tankies’ in all political parties in the US etc and the Libertarian faction of the Democrat Party
Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) (like in modern China):
Unlike in China, there would be a People’s Democracy (Leninism also auth dem like Peronism) which would allow multiclass and multi party democracy along the path to socialism. Low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie would also be allowed to participate in this greater proletarian movement that would be determined by and part of a broad social base that would underline peaceful socialist revolutions.
This is because the People’s Democracy recognizes that the working class are not necessarily an impediment, and could be used to mobilize and serve as the basis for building a state that as mentioned below has corporatist elements that would align labor interests with at least a large sect of the national bourgeoisie to promote a Civic Patriotic Collectivism-Communitarian agenda as mentioned below peronism
Leadership positions would be held by the Communist and labor parties, to build more cohesion these parties would merge with our Social Democrat parties on the basis of Marxism Leninism
In a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) there would be a people centered approach for the public interest (improving people's lives and well being as the primary goal of development and the mediation of tensions between the societal classes, with the state responsible for negotiating compromise in worker-boss conflicts latter) government leadership, continuing deepening reforms and an open shared development that is innovative, coordinated, and green, people would be the ‘masters’ of the country (with Kids being the only ‘privileged’ class). This system would balance the right of the individual and society
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) would have state owned assets, collectively owned enterprises and the publicly owned shares of mixed enterprises .
This would result in a highly diffused form of public ownership where state owned enterprises are owned by some different government entities, agencies and other state owned enterprises. The government would command over and majorly regulate virtually all sectors of a market-based economy. Like in Peronism this would be a centralized government, with an organized State and a free people. It would be a political, economic and social doctrine
These commercial enterprises would be established by either our central government or by a local government, where the managers are appointed by the government or public bodies. This would include wholly state funded and managed firms. Most of these state owned enterprises are not entities of the central government, they would be subunits of the State owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC).
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) enterprises who are held by the state would be publicly listed firms where the state would own a large or controlling share within the firms, thereby they would exert influence on the firm’s management. This would include firms that receive foreign direct investment.
SOEs would be much larger in size but fewer in number than State Held Enterprises, with the central government-p owned SOEs being clustered in strategic sectors that would include banking, finance, mining, energy, transportation, telecommunications and public utilities. More local level SOEs would number in the thousands or or near a thousand and would be involved in almost every industry including information technology and auto design/production..
The centrally owned SOEs would pursue national and industrial policy objectives.
SOEs would be encouraged and even required to pay a higher portion of their profits as dividends to the state. Some state owned assets would be transferred to social security funds to help elderly finance pensions.
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) , privately owned enterprises (POEs) would be recognized as one of the components of this socialist market economy along with state, collective and individually owned enterprises.
The private sector would play an increasingly bigger role than it did in the 1990s in China
The boundary between public and private enterprises would be blurred as many publicly listed firms would be under mixed ownership by various state and non state entities. Private sector firms (in targeted growth industries) would often receive favorable loans and preferential government treatment in this future economy that operate in industries targeted for growth with SOEs in non strategic sectors being exempt from subsidies.
Some select large corporations would be nationalized in a way that blurred distinctions between corporations and government.So there would be a corporatist element to this system.peronism
One way to describe at least a small labor aspect of this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) system would it is in at least small part an alliance between the trade unions and the caudillos peronism
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) , indicative planning and industrial policies would substitute material balance planning and play a key role in guiding our market economy for the state and private sectors. This planning system would consist of three layers, each using a different planning mechanism.
Market relations and markets would become the instrumental driving force in this socialist market economy.
Compulsory planning would be limited to state owned enterprises that would operate in strategic sectors, that would include research, education and infrastructure development plans.
This type of Compulsory planning would outline targeted outcomes and the raw material supply of raw and financial resources that would be needed.
Contractual planning would set objectives and the overall means of achieving these planned goals and then the negotiation would happen with enterprises and local governments to create and implement detailed objectives on how resources to targeted sectors would be allocated
This Indicative planning would operate at the lowest planning system level, where the government would outline industrial targets and then use the market instruments (like tax exemptions, subsidies and favorable bank loans) to entice targeted firms to meet these targets
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) workers' unions are under state management (but some of them would be corporate instead but cede much freedom to strike in exchange for the state assuming the role of negotiator between conflicting interests) there would be healthcare that is between the free healthcare under Peronism and the current healthcare model in China, modern China like welfare, a progressive tax code, (with the lowest bracket being 3 percent and the highest bracket being 45 percent) . It would subsidize electric vehicles, implement a public bike system that would be run by several companies
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) , low income housing projects would be created and workers' recreation centers would be created throughout the US.
Workers would get more paid days off than white collar workers currently do in the UK (regardless if those days off are used for vacation trips or just taking a break from work), jobs would pay half the money of their employees medical related trips and moving expenses
There would be more worker co-ops than there is now and for those worker co-op workers only there would be more paid vacation benefits than in the US and UK.
There would also be raised minimum wage and safety regulations along with a more inclusive SSI system peronism
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) there would be traditional (like USSR) Marxism Leninism socialist core values as mentioned in the ‘alternative to this’ section below
I am a Marxist Leninist because of how good it worked in the USSR . I like USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism AND post Dengist Marxism Leninism (like in modern China) equally
I want either the US to quickly become a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) without a transitioning to that system (since it is very easy for the US to quickly become a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society [like in modern China] as opposed to how very hard it would be for the US to quickly become a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society)
My combined economic views can be best described either as a mix of USSR like planned economy (ie like the one under Marxism-Leninism/Josef Stalin)/Multipolar
Bernie Sanders, AOC and so called ‘Progressives’ are social fascists because they can’t create a world where everyone who needs insulin can comfortably afford insulin. We need real Left Wing politicans who can create such a world
I am against Neoliberalism (including Capitalism) as I feel that Neoliberalism has inflamed or caused most of the problems the US is facing today and has negative effects on many people throughout the US. Moreover we have to abolish the Capitalist value system of traditional conservatism to create a less divisive world where we are in control, free of stratified social classes, wedge issues and reactionaries on both sides
Basically Anarcho Syndicalists operating within autonomous vanguard parties in maybe in this type of way
Eventually the workers would through this path challenge unjust hierarchies and then seize the means of production including property and the functions of the state/bourgeoisie destroying and expropriating these things by the working class and thus would easily create a quick and direct path to abolishing class which it will do after enduring USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism for years, as well as preventing dictatorships from rising by using a dictatorship of the proletariat here (a DotP that is representative of the people and counterposed against the state against any counter revolutionaries/resistance and state bureaucracy) similar to dictator in anarcho monarchism
There might be a traditional DotP here only if it could be set up like democratic workplace confederations and local assemblies that are like a DotP in all but a name
This Anarcho Syndicalist type state would only be temporary as they would then have to a cede to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism system and society . Eventually, down the line, USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism would then transition into a Anarcho Syndicalist society instead of a Communistic one
This is because you can’t create a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society within the confines of capitalism without a DotP, so then the DotP helps in abolishing our capitalistic state structure , our class society and the state so the possibility of a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism state become a reality.
During this transitional period it will become necessary for anarchists to protect and establish themselves by setting up their management of the economy in order to begin this process of transitioning to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society
In this transition to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society or even in this USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society, I would support fiscally responsible Keynesian government spending (fiscally responsible Keynesianism like the Keynesianism that was employed by GWB and Ronald Reagan or that was employed in the early mid 20th century, i.e Weaponized/Military Keynesianism) on things like public works (i.e Keynesian style of government/deficit spending spending) when the economy needs a boost due to things like inflation, deflation, depressions, recessions using the exact type of)
In this eventual USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society the USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism would partly be a type with USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism that doesn't have democratic hierarchal structures (i.e has a social scale and has a ‘normative’ Marxist structure of the core inner circle of educated urban intellectuals within the party that has a major say in the working class)
Through this form of USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism, in that USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society, its organization principles, influence within structures and groups that are popular forms a new (post class) society which the party’s body and its appointees have major say in the affairs of the working class
In this eventual USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society the workers would have genuine control over the means of production through institutions such as trade unions while keeping some stake in companies they previously had more control over. The state would allow the community to own the means of production and provide each of its participants with consumption "according to their needs"
As noted here, in this USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society there would be no racial-ethnic inequality or wealth inequality. Every citizen would have the right (or requirement) to work, and jobs would be allocated by the state, not competed for as they were in the west
I am a Marxist Leninism because of how good it worked in the USSR
I am pro big business and would want a society that values big business (including bringing Guilds back if there are monopolies and allowing Guilds to be widespread as they were in the Middle Ages, effectively granting these individual guilds in many different industries, especially in the online sphere xi) if we can’t transition to be a Marxist Leninist society nat soca strasserist wing and xi jinping thought
The anti authoritarian movement is so over the top and goes too far at times, it makes anti authoritarianism seem like reverse fascism to me
To quote the USSR “ Therefore, the ground principle of our society was he/she who does not work, neither shall he eat” Once we get to our Marxist Leninist society there would be no need for welfare due to Marxist Leninist things like paid maternity leave, free education, free healthcare and free housing which function more as tech breaks and enhancements that would be needed to make the socialistic human workforce to reproduce itself and perform at its zenith. It would not be part of a social contract between the state and citizens.
Race is a myth. We are all one race, the human race. All Whites, Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, Indigenous peoples etc are of one or more ethnicities. There are as much differences between whites and blacks, as there are differences between Irish people and Russian people , between Japanese people and Thai people, between Greek people and British people, between Angolans and Ethiopians etc. So this is a perfect counter to racists, since when they are racist, they are real hating 'their own race'.
However, I believe there are significant differences between humans and extinct species or subspecies of humans from Earth like Denisovan, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo habilis, Australopithecus africanus, Paranthropus boisei, Australopithecus sediba, Homo ergaster, and Paranthropus robustus (in the same exact way that Racialists believe that there are significant differences between Whites and Blacks, Asians, Hispanic, and Indigenous peoples).
I believe that Denisovan, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo habilis, Australopithecus africanus, Paranthropus boisei, Australopithecus sediba, Homo ergaster, and Paranthropus robustus were of a difference race than the human race (the human race is Whites, Blacks, Asians, Hispanic, and Indigenous peoples)
I am 'racialist' against Denisovan, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo habilis, Australopithecus africanus, Paranthropus boisei, Australopithecus sediba, Homo ergaster, and Paranthropus robustus
Marxist Leninism is good because it will destroy classes and income inequality which lead naturally to a non racist world
Whites are sadly the Aristocrat class in the US (but white privilege is not real) . In the French Revolution the left abolished the Aristocracy, when we abolish all classes and create a classless society, we will luckily abolish the White Aristocrat class along with all classes
The id pol writers like Ta’Neshi Coates and Margaret Atwood are bourgeois hacks
While my reason for off the record not supporting BLM is due to the pandemic, I do have non pandemic related issues with BLM (but those issues have nothing to do with me off the record not supporting them): I feel BLM is counterproductive. BLM is a Neoliberal front (and I am against Neoliberalism) which is seen with their relations to corporations etc
I believe that under Fidel Castro etc, Cuba was a model for equal rights. It appeared to be great when Fidel Castro took over Cuba but he did not live up to what was promised to the citizens when he took over. Some of his fiscal policies were salvageable. It's good Cuba only had people drive those 1950s type cars (ie that they rejected globalism)
However I am about somewhat to the left of Marco Rubio on all other things to do with Fidel Castro and Cuba. I use to support the embargo with Cuba but now I am apolitical/indifferent to it
I am not a LGBTQ ally and I am not a LGBTQ rights activist because the LGBTQ movement is a Neoliberal front and I am against Neoliberalism. see this for more. I am pro LGBTQ and they have a right to do what they do, since the government should never dictate what people do privately or civilly . I am inclusive toward LGBTQ people
I am glad that Stalinism was pro gay. https://www.marxist.com/letter-to-stalin-can-a-homosexual-be-in-the-communist-party.htm
straight pride is based walkaway tankie
In the distant future, IF the Left Wing Progressives, Liberals and Democrats turn on gays and say that being gay is wrong and that gay rights (including gay marriage) are wrong from a Left Wing, Progressive and Liberal perspective instead of a Right Wing, Conservative and Christian perspective, in that hypothetical future, I would be against people being gay and against gay rights (including gay marriage) . My reason would be, since I am an Independent-Democrat Liberal-Progressive, if in the future our party platform and ideological platform says that being gay is wrong and that gay rights (including gay marriage) is wrong (from a Left Wing, Progressive and Liberal perspective) I will have to adopt those views even if I don't understand why those change are being made. I put the Democrat Party and Progressive values first and with blind optimism, I trust Democrat and Progressive values to always do the right thing, even if I don't know why. my own idea
While I am pro LGBTQ, I feel that LGBTQ rights are used by neoliberals and neocons to justify the US and NATO’s imperialism and those neoliberals and neocons are wrong to do that. Imperialism is wrong
For example, Zionists and neoliberals and neocons criticize Palestine for being ‘homophobic’ and for their gay criminalization laws. The neoliberals and neocons use that to justify helping he occupiers (Israel) to oppress (ymmv) the Palestinians.
There is no liberation without LGBTQ liberation. However, neoliberals forcing pro LGBTQ policies on homophobic countries is bad because it will make the LGBTQ movement be associated with western imperialism. This will be counterproductive and cause anti LGBTQ sentiment due to the LGBTQ movement wrongly being associated with Imperialism. This will basically violate the West’s do no harm principal in ways the West never imagined in the global south.
Instead we (the left) should work with our global south allies while accepting they might be homophobic at times. We can point out it is wrong do be that way in our spaces, but we can’t and should not force them to be better while we do show them that we ( the left) will work with them to fight imperialism and that we accept the LGBTQ community etc
LGBTQ being too open about their sexuality ,mainly with the kink and similar non family friendly things is not ideal since that wrongly makes the LGBTQ an ‘interest group’. That destablizes anti LGBTQ countries and can lead to counterproductive color revolutions. This is class essentialism
Nordic and UK Social Democracy is good but one negative thing about it is that it breeds TERFs and that is bad. Nordic and UK Social Democracy should instead covertly push the TERFs to work with Transgender people to use Trangender accelerationism to light a fire under TERFs and other feminists to fight harder to tear down the male patriarchy since transgenderism makes it harder to do so
While fighting for trans rights are important, fighting to end our inflation is more important at this time
Jan 6 sympathy :I don't believe that the January 6th Capital thing was worse than 9/11. If people start saying and believing nonsense like 'January 6th 2021 was worse than 9/11', then there is a slippery slope so it's best not to make dumb comparisons like that. 9/11 was way way way worse for our country than what happened on January 6 2021. On 9/11, thousands of people died, lower Manhattan was in ruins for months. People were missing their families, and many people died years later of diseases related to the attacks. To say that January 6 2021, was anywhere near as bad as 9/11 is foolish, ignorant, and makes us liberals look bad to people we are trying to convert to D. January 6th also wasn't a terrorist attack or what I would call an inserection.
I admit, some people can see from their perspective that the January 6 2021 protestors who stormed into the capitol were backwoods, monster, psychotic, deranged thugs and the dredges of society. But dehumanizing them only plays on the worst aspects of human psyche.
The January 6 2021 protestors (and by extension the fringe of the Republican party) are now treated as badly as LGBTQ+ used be treated and as bad as pedophiles are treated. I am not saying that it is wrong they are treated like that but I am asking that is the path our country wants to take?
I sympathize with the January 6 protestors and between that and me being a contrarian tankie who loves to be countercultural against the liberal mainstream (opposite if the 1960s hippies), I will write what I write below about Jan 6 from those perspectives instead of my bourgeois anti Jan 6 protestor perspective: (bolded)
Should we try to help the January 6 2021 protestors (and by extension the fringe of the Republican party) like we help pedophiles not be so hated and stigmatized while converting the January 6 protestors to be non bigoted Tankies or Democrat Libertarians or should we just let the January 6 2021 protestors (and by extension the fringe of the Republican party) suffer because they aren't on Team Democrat or because their political views don't align with ours? Breaking down barriers means breaking down barriers (no pun intended).
It wasn't long ago that our country demonized Muslims after 9/11, now they are doing it with the other side's fringe. It was great we did and continue to help Muslims not be stereotyped , discriminated against or hated, but we don't get to pick which oppressed people we get to help. It doesn't work like that. Liberals are supposed to be compassionate not cold hearted.
Many of those January 6 2021 protestors are parents, grandparents, husbands, wives, Christians, Atheists, Democrats, Republicans, Independents etc. Some protestors including a Purple Heart Vietnam War veteran (warmonger), a man with a lego set of the Capitol, a BIPOC+ actor from Hollywood (Hollyweird), Indiana grandmother and lifelong Democrat etc.
The January 6 protesters were only doing what they did on January 6 2021 because those protesters like so many Trump supporters are what some people would call brainwashed or cultists (I wouldn't use strong words like those 2 words to describe them but whatever).
So on January 6 2021, the January 6 protesters were what some people would call brainwashed to demand that the election results be overturned and to do things inside (and to a lesser extent outside) of the Capitol which drew condemnation from the MSM, Liberals, many moderate Republicans and some others. If anyone is to blame for that whole sad situation its Donald Trump since he has such influence over them and according to some people, brainwash them or at best, didn't deter them (brainwash by omission).
The Stop the Steal rally itself wasn't wrong (people can get whipped up to protest just about anything). Those protestors had every right to protest (outside of the Capitol) what they thought was a stolen election.
As for going into the Capitol, at least one defendant was cleared by a judge who said that his testimony saying he was waved into the Capitol by Capitol police was believable but whatever
Regardless if they were let in by Capitol police, who knows what they were trying to do once they got into the Capitol as their thoughts must have been racing and they may have had a trouble figuring out what to do next (I cannot deny that it might have crossed the minds of at least a few of protestors who got into the Capitol to prevent the transfer or power to Joe Biden and AOC felt threatened as did some others so keep that in mind too).
If they were let in by Capitol police, those Capitol police may have been far right and thought that letting the protestors in would stop Joe Biden from becoming President (regardless if that was the intention of the protestors who entered the Capitol). We need to secure our elections in the future and have accountable leaders and politicians so these things don't happen again.
I do not support the January 6 protestors but I do support some very specific January 6 counterprotestors my own addition since those liberal counterprotestors were the real rioters and intersectionists
When Donald Trump was elected President, I said "give him a chance" and "wait and see,maybe he'll be an ok President". I was open minded to his Presidency like Hillary Clinton and Jimbo Wales were. But of course, I was wrong. But I liked that Trump was anti imperialist and that he challenged the neolib/neocon agenda. I like how funny and honest he was. He was a unique treasure. I believe Donald Trump has mental issues and he needs mental help. It's abelist to attack Donald Trump and to mock him. He truly has something wrong and needs to be fixed.
Joe Biden and his FBI have and CIA have been violating civil liberties of political opponents and innocent parents and that needs to stop.
Personally and legality wise, I don’t really care about human rights since human rights are a bourgeois concept that at times are used to defend the right. Systematically, I am morally (moral as in moral victory) apolitically progressive on human rights , plus what I write in the next paragraph
I believe that the government/state should stay out of being enforcing moral changes in most to nearly all situations. Moral evolution can happen many times apart of the government/state and relations between people can emerge with freedom from the government/state. Most relationships in life should not be characterized as conflict as the left and right might have it. It's good to have mutual and humane respect for others as individuals. It's also good to do positive and unselfish things without having to grapple with the political ramifications of doing those positive things. Of course we don't want to be so humane and clingy that is becomes creepy.
Based on what the powerful Corporate media machine(the same one that smeared Bernie and continues to smear actual leftists to preserve the establishment bourgeois DINOs) ,Wikipedia(who only uses those sources), and our government say about the 2020 Presidential election being won legally by Joe Biden and that there was no election steal by Joe Biden and the Democrats, I have to go by those sources and say I have no reason to believe that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen by Joe Biden and the Democrats. It would be fun to have a contrarianist view of that election to say that it was ‘stolen’ by the Democrats and Joe Biden because it is fun to ‘counter cultural’ snd against the mainstream
I will note that a lot of people you never would except actually believe that the 2020 Presidential election was 'stolen' by the Democrats and Joe Biden (not that I believe them because I really don't). We need to focus on making all elections in the future as secure, fair and open as possible.
If there is not free speech in political debate, the downtrodden may be worse off. Who can expose the oppressors? I support #freespeech and fully disagree with anti free speech fascist Lara Kiswani https://t.co/eeD7bdV7EI (twitter reply to Tweet)
I support JK Rowling type postfeminism which includes using judicial reform to eliminate patriarchy from the legal system. This allows for the true emancipation of women from traditional social inferiority and economic exploitation. This means society should collectively assume the roles that mothers and wives were traditionally assigned (via remove private property and a classless society)
My thoughts on Roe v Wade being overturned can be found here tankie
I support Marxist-Leninist Egalitarianism
I oppose hierarchy including class hierarchy. I support solidarity and liberation which will lead to a classless society without hierarchy. This is a natural progression. If we need to use far left National Liberalism to reach that point of getting to that classless society without a heirarchy, I guess we' need far left National Liberalism to do so as a necessary evil
I am an Anti Imperialist
I am a Non Interventionalist
I am against Globalization
China-Russia
A lot of criticism of China and the CCP is based off of ignorance
The 2022 Winter Olympics being played on schedule while the 2020 Summer Olympics weren't played on schedule seems hypocritical. I am against boycottting sporting events and I would never encourage anyone to boycott the 2022 Winter Olympics but I am fine with people boycotting the 2022 Winter Olympics.
I am apolitical on China's pandemic laws etc.
I don't think China should have gotten involved in the US 2020 racial unrest situations. I also condemn China for trying to make our children in this country woke through their books and videos on those issues they export to our schools.
I believe sanctioning China for the Uyghur situation or any reason short of an illegal war won't work , since sanctions usually don’t work. China should not be sanctioned ever unless using those sanctions is a no brainer like as mentioned above. I want the US to focus on our own country and leave China and other counties alone. If Democrats want to do good , then they need to be real Left Wing or Far left instead of attacking China.
Many countries have denied that China committed a genocide. China is wrong, not for abusing the Uyghur people, but for not being a Christian country, for if they were a Christian country, they never would have abused the Uyghurs in the first place.
So their abuse of the Uyghurs is a consequence of that grave mistake. The US has no leg to stand on in going after China. The US is anti migrant and treats migrants like second class citizens, the US committed crimes against humanity in their Islamaphobic neocon war on Islam. Other anti China countries have done their own abuses too, from Canada’s horrific human rights abuses and forced expulsions of First Nations people to the UK’s abuse of Indians in India etc , those countries should take the beam out of their own eyes before going after China. I need to find more info on the abuses by China of the Uyghurs to give a better opinion on it I will note that liberals all over Europe (some with reports) at least believe its plausible that at least a few of the allegations against China have very little evidence and are may (at worst) be used as an excuse to justify aggressions against China. tankie from okanarckiddie
China should read Paul’s Epistle to Philemon , become Christian and thus forced labor will no longer be an issue since it would virtually cease to exist in China
I trust that China will continue to get better as a country like they always have and become more egalitarian as they develop more productive forces(though part of me leans skeptical). But something needs to push China in that direction . China and the CCP are like between has a Hero Antagonists and Bad Boys to me
I am apolitical on high tariffs against China
I am apolitical with Hong Kong in their dispute with China.
If China wants Taiwan I won’t condemn them since Taiwan is already colonized by taking but I don’t support them taking Taiwan either. (China doesn’t need my support)
I apolitically begrudgingly open hearted pretty much sympathize with the USSR (especially the early 1920s-1950s version) to an extent retroactively. In the 1980s I was apolitical toward the USSR but not against them. The USSR was an ally of the US in two World Wars and had a good fiscal system, if the USSR became Post Capitalist it would have been almost based in my eyes. amongst other positive things they did. If the Democrats and mainstream liberals ever retroactively support or condone the USSR I will be retroactively against the USSR
The holodomor was a result of the USSR’s incompetance, there is no solid evidence that Josef Stalin i teionally orchestrated it or that it was intentional . The bourgeois , liberals and MSM defame the USSR by saying it was intentional to trash Socialism, Communism , Russia in order to force normies tobe imperialist fascists. Saying the famine was done on purpose by the USSR is indirectly anti semetic and plays into anti semetic conspiracy theories
The USSR and Russia never colonized Africa which is very good and makes the USSR and Russia better than many countries on that point alone. No countries should have been colonized ever
The USSR (and had a very major part in defeating N..azisi.sm) tankie
I was against the Nuclear Freeze in the 1980s and early 1990s only because I knew that the US having Nuclear weapons was to prevent the Soviet Union from using their Nuclear weapons. To this day I am still against a Nuclear Freeze due to countries like Russia, Iran and North Korea having Nuclear weapons. I want a world free of Nuclear Weapons but I will not support a Nuclear Freeze until countries like Russia, Iran and North Korea also agree to give up their Nuclear Weapons too. I do not want a Nuclear war. I am a Nuclear Abolitionist and true peace activist in this regard..
Arthur Rosenberg and Ethel Rosenberg were traitors and they should have spent many decades in prison for their treason instead of being executed (unless they agreed to be spies for the US against the USSR instead of going to prison then I would conditionally be open to that alternative). As it is now they were traitors to the US and the world, their treason cost millions of Americans their lives fighting in Korea. They sold the US out and they are 2 of the more bigger disgraces in the history of the US.
The Russia SFSR should never have transferred Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR. As it now, I am mixed on Crimea becoming an Independent nation but I sympathize with people who want Crimea to become an Independent nation.
I believe , like Pat Robertson that Vladimir Putin feels a higher power pushed him to invade Ukraine (or is just off his rocker). https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10551251/Did-Covid-send-Putin-mad.html
Despite what I wrote above, my view on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine match these fellow ‘snarky’ tankies’ views on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-the-sneakiest-defenders-of-vladimir-putins-ukraine-invasion-and-chinas-xinjiang-repression
If Russia attacks the US then me and Ukraine will have a common enemy (Russia). Which would be like during World War I where Woodrow Wilson said that the US and the Allies had common enemies during World War I . In that case there would be no future for Russia since there would likely be a nuclear war in that hypothetical situation so it would be easy to be against Russia then. But Russia hasn't attacked us so that is only hypothetical
I also side with Tulsi Gabbard in her quarrel with Mitt Romney over Russia-Ukraine
The US and Europe should try to de escalate the Russia-Ukraine crisis instead of inflaming it
I was and I am still against Ukraine joining NATO. You can make the case that NATO should be abolished (from a progressive point of view)
I feel in some ways the anti Russian Ukrainians are reactionaries tankies
I am strongly against companies (like Big Tech) suspending their products and services to Russia. Russian citizens are being wrongly and punitively penalized because of their government. I call for a full boycott of every company who engages in these acts They never did this to Muslims in countries where ISIS or Al Qaeda are from, yet they do it with Russia? Hypocrite much. History will condemn Google, Microsoft, Sony for their actions with Russia. It goes against human decency, will only make Russians hate those companies and won't do anything. Hurting innocent people through refusing them service to force them to have the view you want is fascist and evil
I do not support the Maidan Coup as I feel it was an illegal act or in extremely bad taste that borders on being illegal at best and because it removed a legit elected head of state who was admitely not popular (which is not an excuse for it)
Ukraine deserves at least some criticism and maybe more for not developing Donbas and leaving it open to Russia and other forces
Europe
I support the KPD (including from their early 20th century libertarian and council communist beginnings, through their Marxist Leninist incarnation. I accept commend the Anti Racist Action movement work that the KPD did in the 1930s etc in directly countering racism in Germany KPD briefly had enemy of my enemy thing in early 1930s with cliff from cheers army briefly
I support the Haitian protestors.
I try to be open to the Cuban 2021 protesters but I guess I am tolerant if them, but regardless, I hope the Cuban government learns from that and that peace and common ground is found in Cuba. It's a complicated mess that situation
not support contra help nicaraga I was and am against America involvement in Central America (ie Nicaragua) .If I could relive my life over knowing what I know now, I would support the Sandinistas s a kid in the 1980s
Slavery and forced labor is wrong and immoral because the whole concept of working (paid and unpaid) is wrong and immoral. People shouldn't have to work to make ends meet. Working (paid and unpaid) is boring, harsh, a time sink and archaic. I feel that from the 16th century onward, Europe and the US should have given equal rights to women and BIPOC+ (that white males had) in the United States (including Old South), European colonies etc and not used slavery anywhere. Then I would have wanted Europe and the US to give all citizens of the United States (including Old South), European colonies etc the Refusal to work right, and implemented extensive Social Democrat type welfare systems (like those found currently in Nordic countries) and UBI throughout the United States (including Old South), European colonies etc However, I do not support a Refusal to work right being implemented anywhere on Earth in the future. I feel the only place for it was centuries ago -my own idea
My views on the Civil War and economics/labor-practices in the mid 19th century US/Old South/Confederacy exactly match Karl Marx’s views on those topics . I believe it was great that Abraham Lincoln was inspired by Karl Marx (and used Marxist rationale) to go to war with the Confederacy, free blacks, and end the mode of exploitation (slavery) as that was by far the best inspiration and rationale for doing what Abraham Lincoln did back then (going to war with the Confederacy, freeing blacks, and ending slavery)
I don't care for welfare but I would use welfare (but not for people who don't want to work, people who abuse welfare, people who can get better benefits outside of welfare etc) In particular through this welfare, it would provide food, shelter and utilities for people in times of need (like winter, or hot summers). I would want this tougher type of welfare to inspire people to be self sufficient or to work for the good of the community (but still have emergency nets if they couldn't). I believe that people ought to be economically self sufficient. Basically a right wing version or early 20th century French version of Marxist-Leninist welfare
You cannot be woke and anti imperialist. You can be anti racist , an advocate of social justice and equality but you can’t join the mobs like ones CNN is fermenting around liberal causes if you oppose their wars. Wokeism is pro Imperialist
I believe that under Fidel Castro etc, Cuba was a model for equal rights. Fidel Castro as horrible as he was, in some ways he cared for his people It appeared to be great when Fidel Castro took over Cuba but he did not live up to what was promised to the citizens when he took over. Some of his fiscal policies were decent. It's good Cuba only had people drive those 1950s type cars (ie that they rejected globalization)
I believe minorities in China should be well taken care of and have more advantages than the majority. I do applaud Chiba for having games to honor their minorities and at least pretending to be as I wrote above. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0x1-egOF2bc
In my alternate life I deeply empathize with Left Wing anti vaxxers and pray they find consolation prizes and a positive path forward
I have no issues with Russia's Sputnik vaxx
I am Radically Centrist lean nuanced intuitive Fourth political position on the way China handled the pandemic .
Migration
At the same time, the US should make it easier for potential migrants to blur the line between being refugees and migrant workers to make the migration system a little more flexible. However, the US should under this system create a more rigorous system to screen refugees and migrant workers than they do now, along with incentivizing refugees and migrant workers to take vocational education and Adjusting to Culture Shock training , using a boarding school type model to help refugees get assimilated, learn about the culture of America so there is less (or even no) culture shock, and help them be able to get jobs etc.
Under the sytem I mentioned above, I'd also want refugees and migrant workers to be encouraged and maybe even incentivized to to form close relationships with law enforcement in the US wherever they move in addition to encourage law enforcement in the US to sponsor refugees and migrant workers. This world allow refugees, migrant workers and law enforcement people to humanize themselves to each other and for those law enforcement officials to do a better job protecting those refugees and migrant workers from xenophobic and anti migrant abuse from anti migrant xenophobes. what china does to uyhurs. Similar to what the ADL suggested in this link (a progressive non bad faith version of what china does to uyghurs). This system would be fused with the “Dignity Proposal” for a few million undocumented migrants/illegal immigrants who are enrolled and eligible for DACA can apply for green cards and obtain American citizenship.
I feel somewhere inside of me that ideally, the US should consider making all illegals who have lived in the US and contribute in some way to our society for at least 7 years (give or take a few years), and basically assimilated in specific ways “de facto legal by default” (but without publically making such a virtue signaling proclaimation, only through actions not words), This way , there would be less bickering and divisiveness over this issue since that would be a stealth way to extremely decrease illegals in the US without deporting them or creating harsh anti immigration policies (but different than Ronald Reagen did it, in part because this wouldn’t be amnesty but a fundamental change to permanently blur or even remove the lines between legal and ‘illegal’ immigrant while retro fitting current illegals into this change by making them ‘de facto legal by default’). Can’t complain about ‘illegal’ immigrants if there is hardly a line between legal and illegal immigrants basically non tankie marxism
I am not ‘pro open borders’ or ‘far left’ on migration because I see the negative effect of migration in that migration is used to undercut wages and that migration can be detrimental to the entire working class. However my views on migration vary based on whatever the current conditions exist at the time tankie
Using this quote as a guideline “A study of the struggle waged by the English working class reveals that, in order to oppose their workers, the employers either bring in workers from abroad or else transfer manufacture to countries where there is a cheap labour force.” a panel would be created. This panel of people together and collectively would fuse their ideas together to compromise on a way to deal with those very rare illegal immigrants who don’t meet the above conditions (in a way that meshes with the ideals of that quote) . tankie marxism
That panel would include Len McCluskey tankieish marxist uk anti brexiter, Henry Cueller, Judge John Roberts, George Lopez, Juan Peron, and a fictional SBNR, empathetic, intuitive, somewhat pragmatic and DIAN (Democrat in all but a Name) version of Jan Bewer
Crime
Even though I am not pro police, I support the Marxist Leninist secret police like pro police people support Blue Lives Matter tankie
Comments
Post a Comment