Sounds far right but really left wing (all blogs)

All https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

Civic Nationalism

Far center

Moreover, seeing gays sell out and be parents is depressing. I always respected how gays were unique and didn't want to follow social norms, but gays having children means they are selling out and becoming hetero in all but a name.  

Parallel right 

I am ….. Anarcho Libertarian (including ANLeftWingCap and Free Market Synthesis Anarchist), Left Libertarian

I support a hypothetical fiscal system that combines Left-Wing Laissez Faire with a fusion of Economic Liberal Corporatism , Social Corporatism and Keynesian Corporatism and Democratic Classic Liberalism 

I conditionally support this type https://www.jstor.org/stable/41303403  of Austrian Economics that is fused with Economic Progressiveness [not Liberalness] (which includes anti capitalism [Post Capitalism], Keynesian economics of Paul Krugman, Ronald Reagan and of the General Theory analysis of effective demand that Right Wing Marxist-Leninists could transform etc, along with Marxism , Grifterness and other left wing schools of socioeconomic thought) and fused with center right Milton Friedman-CSoE-Monetarism   

I reject mainstream monetary policies, such as central banking and state-issued currency lib party (and I prefer a moneyless society)

I generally support free market policies but I really support freed markets

I am against corporate privilege . To end corporate privilege we must eliminate bailouts, subsides, cartelizing regulations along with similar state driven legal, political and fiscal features that enable corporate power

I generally support conditional private property rights, especially based on occupation and use

Legality wise, I support Welfare and Welfare Chauvinism (I am a Welfare Chauvinist). Legality wise I believe the welfare system/state should be removed only if it means abolishing the government and the bad forms of Capitalism (which we should be striving for)

I support protecting civil liberties. The state is a foe to our civil liberties and the best way to safeguard our civil liberties is to protect each other’s control over our bodies and justly acquired possessions

The Frankfurt School is related to Post modernism and post structuralism which is basically what we call Cultural Marxism 

It is ok that some relationships (like close acquaintances and monogamous relationships) are exclusionary to other people. There is no bright line rule regarding permissible and impermissible exclusion. Ideally (though not a deal breaker), when particular intimate sub communities justifiably exclude someone—for the simple reason that they would cease to be the kinds of communities they are if they weren’t strictly (lime limited in size), there is clearly room for the excluded person in the broader community of which they are components. Ideally they would be welcomed/included there When justifiable exclusion occurs, it should ideally not reflect false beliefs about or unreasonable reactions to some group of which the excluded person belongs.  For example, perhaps A acts reasonably in deciding not to marry B because of vital differences in the ways in which B and A understand the nature of marriage, differences that might come to light from B’s membership in a certain group with a traditional view of  marital relationships in a specific way.  But this is different from A’s deciding not to marry B either because of the fact that certain visible members of B’s group hold marital views even if (1) A does not know that B has those views or (2) B credibly denies having those views or (b) A holds to a prejudice against members of B’s group, like believing that cohabitation with a member of this group would make someone like A unclean. From my position, I generally oppose exclusion. I make reasonable exceptions only/roughly when they don’t involve exclusion from large and relatively impersonal communities and relationships and only when they are not rooted in false beliefs or unreasonable reactions. By saying that exclusion is morally objectionable that does not determine what counts as an appropriate solution for morally unjustifiable exclusion. It isn’t helpful or needed to justify exclusion as reasonable or morally appropriate, to be against to the use of physical force to counter exclusion. Though I believe in some rarer cases using physical force to combat exclusion is justifiable if done the right way with an eye for forcing said hierarchal systems to be destroyed quickly

Right

I support the type of fiscal ‘Neoliberalism’ that fuses New Zealand’s labour government’s fiscal system (falsely called ‘neoliberalism or fake socialistic) and the center left neoliberalism political movement from the post 1960s modern American liberalism that sometimes embraces Third Way policies with Bill Clinton Progressive Neoliberalism that is fused with a Post Neoliberal world equivalent of center right Milton Friedman-CSoE-Monetarism

I support a Ronald Reagan Democratic form (Ronald Reagan used Democratic Capitalism in the early 1980s)  of what modern socialists and communists falsely label USSR ‘Capitalism’  fiscal system that can be labeled interchangeably as State Capitalism, Bureaucratic Collectivism, State Socialism, and a unique Mode of Production    Not Ronald Reagan Democratic Capitalism but Ronald Reagan Democratic USSR pseudo ‘Capitalism’

Far right

I support using Agorism (ie including counter economics ; interactions that avoid taxes, disregard regulation or of trade in explicitly non legal materials or services which encompass both the grey market and the black market (including garage sales, lemonade stands, 99.99% of everything sold on craigslist, etc) that is fused with Left-Wing Laissez Faire to create something similar to 19th century economic liberalism

I support China’s Supply Side Reform like Alex Keaton supported Supply Side Economics on Family Ties. China and the CCP’s version of Ronald Reagan’s supply side economics

I am ok with to tolerant of Lee Atwater's fiscal-welfare views but ONLY when they are fused with Humanistic Capitalism/B Sanderism, Free Market Yellow Socialism and Welfare Chauvinism, otherwise I am against his fiscal-welfare views

More often than not, bank bailouts showed the banks rule over the government while the government rules over us. Banks used the bailouts to enrich themselves and their corrupt shareholders. The banks should be seized and turned over to worker committees and community reps that serve the public

A lesser but still a big reason I am against gay rights and gay marriages that infringe upon other peoples’ rights is because I feel that gays are being used by liberals as stepping stones to further their own selves and party. Liberals also use gays as background objects to fill their diversity quotas/fetishes or to make themselves look 'moral' which also triggers me. Unlike Liberals, I at least have respect for the Christian right since they level with them and try to in their minds help them in what they perceive to be the ‘correct’ way and treat them as humans not as background objects.

The reason why I am very wary of transgenderism is because transgender people are sadly harmed when they try to defy the patriarchy and its gender expectations and that makes me very wary of supporting transgender rights knowing transgender people could be harmed by such patriarchy. We need to destroy traditional gender roles (and gender roles themselves) and the patriarchy as noted elsewhere in this blog so men acting feminine etc is seen as normal as men acting masculine and women acting masculine etc is seen as normal as women acting feminine now and thus by extension where being transgender etc is seen as being normal as cisgender

Once we destroy the patriarchy (which I am trying to try to do), I will unconditionally support transgender rights since I will know then that with the patriarchy destroyed, transgender people won’t be harmed anymore since we will be in a world without traditional gender roles or without any gender roles

I only support transgender rights for every transgender person who falls into three or more of these categories (until we destroy the patriarchy then I will unconditionally support transgender rights regardless if transgender people meet my my criterias below): They truly defy traditional gender roles and in a way that won’t get harmed by the patriarchy (mens liberation reason ie left reason against trans rights)

Children networks should not be teaching kids about Draq Queens. Children should not be drag queens Shame on Nickelodeon for their indoctrination of our kids with that trash. Drag queens stereotype and objectify women and teach children to do so which makes it harder to destroy the patriarchy so we have to stop this

I am as pro life as I am mostly because of the liberal like SJW tactics the pro lifers used to covert people to be pro life converted me to be ‘pro life’ (from a liberal like SJW perspective). I see the unborn baby’s rights like modern liberal SJW activists see the pregnant mother’s rights. I feel unborn babies rights are even more important than the rights of adults since unborn babies are most vulnerable (I am a Youth rights activist and ally of Disability rights). 

I support Men’s Liberation and I am generally a Feminist ally (especially in combating Toxic Masculinity). I am Anti Sexist

I generally believe that Male Patriarchy/Patriarchy is at least somewhat culturally pervasive and it has a negative effect on everyone, and negatively effects women more than men. Gender stereotypes harm BOTH men and women.We need more civil liberties and gender equality. The patriarchy is still unfortunately a factor and has claimed many victims (mostly women). Gender roles suck

The patriarchy might (big might) be enforced by women too (at least slightly see below) so the concept of a male patriarchy/patriarchy is not as simple as a oppressor-oppressed dynamic.

Patriarchy misses the point that there is equal vulnerability of average men and that our Patriarchal system excludes men who don’t conform to traditional gender roles. 

As much as I loathe intersectionality, it has its uses in this area. Complicating the patriarchy idea is that Transgender men and gay men are more likely to defy the gendered patriarchal expectations which sadly harm them for daring to be different in this boring vanilla world, which gives them unique outlooks on this.

Anyway, ‘manliness’ shouldn’t be defined by the traditional archaic perceptions of that term . Men should be able to act how they want whether traditionally masculine or other ways that aren’t traditionally masculine (like femboys) That does not mean men can’t still be proud of their masculinity despite defying gender role norms . I hate society telling people how they are supposed to act, whether its gender roles, what type of clothes to wear (why can’t I wear unmatching clothes or white after Labor Day?), and similar things. Men can also lift to better themselves instead of for the sexist degrading reason of impressing women (which is so archaic)

Patriarchy/Male Patriarchy is sadly a real and infests our culture and institutions. We have to stop women from being oppressed. we must counter and defeat sexism. Men also have issues because of this evil patriarchal system and intersectionality along with other feminist concepts are needed to combat this

Feminism should be inclusive to everyone like body positive, body negative feminist movements are like so

I disagree with feminism on dating and relationship struggles. Contrary to what feminists claim, those issues are not due to not respecting boundaries or lack of self confidence. Those issues are because dating involves a lot of work for men including men having to make guesses on when to make their move. This can be tiring and not really fair to men. Also feminists don’t realize that men are offended and hurt by the fact that many women are shallow when choosing a man, using arbitrary and shallow things like fashion, career status, social status, body fitness, wealth. Moreover feminists don’t realize how sad and archaic it is for some women to choose traditionally masculine men.

Women are unfortunately not willing to let men have their emotional guard down and feminists insensitively claim men should stay away from such women while also countering this view by men in addition to saying no one is ‘entitled’ to a relationship. It is true that men can’t/SHOULD NOT force someone to love another person, but the feminists mentioned above are not helpful in this at all, and they underscore how it is perfectly normal to want a relationship over involuntary relationship loneliness which our society should try to prevent. They are however correct that forcing someone into a relationship is wrong 

We need to expose the patriarchal injustices in society and fix them . Both men and women should be free

The reason why I am very wary of transgenderism is because transgender people are sadly harmed when they try to defy the patriarchy and its gender expectations and that makes me very wary of supporting transgender rights knowing transgender people could be harmed by such patriarchy. We need to destroy traditional gender roles (and gender roles themselves) and the patriarchy as noted elsewhere in this blog so men acting feminine etc is seen as normal as men acting masculine and women acting masculine etc is seen as normal as women acting feminine now and thus by extension where being transgender etc is seen as being normal as cisgender

I am a fan of NO MA'AM from Married with Children because they are so bad ‘they’re good’ and because  I sort of pity them for being slaves to masculinity and manliness . The NO MA’AMers need to be liberated from their slavery to the oppressive traditional male gender role so they can be free to embrace non traditional gender roles so they can truly be happy and pro woman

If I sound too harsh on migration and illegal migration, its only because since I am generally against Capitalism (ESPECIALLY crony Capitalism), I realize that mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration is beneficial to the capitalist class and thus that makes mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration bad in my eyes. Because migration happens within a capitalist country like the US, migration is sadly a modern day version of bondage (like in the Old South)  Back then, there was colonialist exploitation happening within a capitalist country via bondage due to similar conditions to today. Today via mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration, migrants and illegals sadly end up working below minimum wage or barely minimum wage in a subsistence type existence (like fuel construction work of migrants in the US for example) within a capitalist country not too much better or different than the type of dehumanizing capitalist worker exploitation that slaves were put through in the Old South. When we defeat Capitalism and usher in a more socialistic country that meshes with my economic views, I will become very pro migrant and even pro illegal migrant (ie I will then become as progressive on migration and illegal migration as a Rage Against the Machine idealized Paul Ryan would be on migration and illegal migration)  leninism , meshes with PSL red green brown multipolar theme also sounds right wing but really left wing

I am Christian Democratically open hearted to at least temperorary closed borders being implented now, without reaching a tipping point (for indirect cosmopolitian reasons). Wealthy liberal countries like the US having closed borders, allows the US to spend less money and resources on migration things and more money and resoucres spent for building and maintaining international institutions which the US can use to help the world's poor to live better lives and to build those other countries up.  Denying the US a right to close the border to be able to build up and use more money and resources to help poor people in third world countries  undermines their prospects for constructing bigger and internatoinal mechanism which would in turn provide the best long term odds of improving the lives of many of the world's poorest citizens .     Moreover, this would encourage more migrants to the US to apply for asylum status. If migrants want to come to the US if we have closed borders, they can use counter economic methods to get into the US (and they'd be encouraged by NGOs to do so to get around the closed border)   see this for more https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/immigration/#IndCos

I also believe we need to create a biparstian (true bipartisan) study to look into the practicality and viability of a new, hypothetical migration system that sends hundreds of migration officials, psychologists and cultural officials from Central America and Mexico to the other side of the border where illegals pile up to ,and then proceed to have said migration officials, psychologists and cultural officials go amongst the hoards of would be illegals with questionaires, lie detectors etc to specifically find find illegals who meet all of the below criteria: Zero criminal history, Patriotic in their previous country and or are Americaphiles Conditionally aren't far left or Communist Won't create chain migrations to the US if they lived here Are not terrorists Contributed to their previous country for years Then if those would be illegals meet all of the above criteria (though it would be a lot easier for them to meet all of the above criteria than it would have been if this system was in place in the US for all would be illegal immigrants from the mid 19th century to the 1920s or 1930s), encourage those particular illegals at the border, not to cross the border illegally but instead apply for legal citizenship to the US under the same exact legal migration system that the US had from the mid to late 19th century to the 1920s or 1930s (but this throwback legal migration system would only be used for them and not for illegals who didn't meet all of the above criteria or who came her legally ,as refugees or under asylum and the illegals would be given the tools to apply from the border personnel above) . If those illegals refused the above compromise ,they would be dealt with more harshly than regular would be illegals and banned from moving to or even traveling to the US under any circumstance for a set period of time. If the study into the above hypothetical migration system shows that the above hypothetical migration system either wouldn't significantly reduce illegal immigrants to the US (and or wouldn't please AmericaFirsters) or if it would significantly reduce illegal immigrants to the US (and or pleased AmericaFirsters) but was seen as worse by moderate Liberals like Krysten Sinema and Stephanie Murphy than a fictional, more conservative Bernie Sanders own hypothetical migration system would be then my hypothetical migration system above would be scrapped or fixed to meet those 2 goals.

The US has Self Determination

I support Joe Biden invoking 42 during the pandemic

If Left Wing protestors rioted and stormed the Capitol like some of the January 6 protestors (who were far right) ALLEGEDLY did and did so for Left Wing reasons instead of far right reasons , then I would say in that hypothetical world : 

“The (Left Wing) protest wasn't an inserection it was vastly peaceful (Left Wing) protesters. Calling the (Left Wing) protest and (Left Wing) protestors inserection and inserectionists is newsspeak and wrong. A few of the (Left Wing) protesters may have been bad apples who got bent out of shape and escalated things and maybe more , and going into the Capital wasn't the best way to get their point across, but it was vastly a peaceful (Left Wing) protest with peaceful (Left Wing) protesters. The (Left Wing) protesters who went into the Capital weren't trying to stop the transfer of power and they weren't trying to attack anyone. But even if they were trying to do so, it is ok because they are Left Wing protestors and have a Left Wing reason to do so ,unlike the real January 6 protestors of our world”  M gravel quote 

I support the right of self determination for these groups of the US: blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics-Latinos, Hawaiians, Asians, Arabs and Pacific Islanders

White privilege is not real.  I believe in Self Determination

This article https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/07/how-to-be-a-bleeding-heart-libertarian-about-race/  generally reflects some to many of my thoughts I have on race-ethnicity

I do not support BLM, (which means to them I am against BLM due to their whole ‘with us or against us’ schtick even though I am not against them). My main reason for not supporting BLM is because BLM shouldn’t need to rely on whites like me to give them legitimacy by supporting them since BLM needing whites to support them is white saviorism and white ethnocentrism and BLM is against white saviorism and white ethnocentrism

I am not an antiracist, I am a non racist. Racism is contrary to my values. It is believed that racism is a liberal Eurocentric and imperialist ideology. Naturally racism is wrong and evil (new right 4pt slt right maybe horeshoe left)

White people who are racist need to be privately confronted for their bigotry and if they don't change, they should be banished or isolated forcing them to not be racist and change (sorry I don't make those rules, nature makes them and nature does not tolerate racism).  One creative idea to make those white racists become non racist against BIPOC+ would be to reprogram white racists to become woke and to embrace the CRT. This way those white racists can shift their hate target from BIPOC+ to whites or white racists (or at least shift their target from BIPOC+ to woke antiracist liberal WHITES) and employ left wing, CRT anti white  'racism' (ie "BIPOC are equal to Whites but BIPOC+ are more equal than Whites", "whitey is bad whitey is bad") and antiracist tactics toward acceptable target (white racists, maybe whites) while holding on to their other views. 

I am passively indifferent strongly lean accepting (accepting isn’t as strong as supporting) of the woke CRT inspired housing policies like the ones implemented at Williams College, the VA, Mary Lin etc 

I see a silver lining in those CRT inspired school/housing policies like the ones implemented at Williams College the VA etc. Those woke CRT inspired school/housing policies at places like Williams College , the VA etc falsely seem to potential swing voters and dealigned voters to go against everything that liberals and Democrats say they stand for (ie equal rights, antiracism, integration) even though I know the real reason for those woke school/housing policies is to help BIPOC be protected from bigots via these safe spaces for them for BIPOC to build solidarity with other BIPOC through these policies and for similar legit reasons woke liberals have for these policies

So those woke CRT inspired school/housing policies expose liberals and Democrats as perceived hypocrites on equal rights, race-ethnicity and integration to ignorant potential swing voters and dealigned voters who don’t know better which helps get those voters to join our red green brown coalition . Any time liberals and Democrats are exposed as hypocrites, even on issues they really are not that way on but falsely appear to be on (such as the one mentioned above), I'll take it, as the more real or imagined liberal hypocrisy exposed the more people realize what a sham that political party is regardless if they are like that

We should not criticize the liberals or Democrats for those woke CRT inspired school/housing policies that I mentioned above, because those policies are safe spaces for marginalized BIPOC along with similar leftist rationale and because it falsely makes liberals and Democrats look bad to ignorant voters who will jump to our side because of it

I don’t care for egalitarianism in the greater equality between classes sense since it is abstract and bourgeois. Classlessness (and hierarchylessness) is not the subordination of our society to universal interests like the universal notion of equality. It is about creating conditions which enables individuals to pursue their desires and interests .We need more concrete principles like opposition to exploitation on materialist grounds and economical logistics.  K Marx

I am systematically empathetic to and open minded to provisionally tolerating something between a fusion of Spiritual-Trans ethnos- voluntary exclusion Ethnopluralism (which is like Ethnopluralism but where different demographic groups also include people who are the same religion as the majority of the group and or inwardly the same ethnos as the majority ethnos in that group ie transethos along with voluntary exclusion as the only form of exclusion that exists and is allowed to exist) with Left Wing Ethnopluralism and Cultural One Nation Labour/Conservatism

Deep down inside, I am sort of am an involuntary Pim Fortuyn List (LPF) Nationalist

I would never do or even encourage this but if right wingers who are anti vaxxers want to get back at pro vaxxers for their mandates and restrictions that they enforced during the pandemic (especially in 2020 and 2021) the best way to do that would be for the right wing anti vaxxers to live (and to get others to live) as 'unfree' (ymmv) and restricted post pandemic as they lived in 2020 and 2021 during the pandemic.  Which means push for lockdowns, travel restrictions, social distancing and possibly face coverings being a permanent thing (this time for non health reasons) while they themselves self isolate, social distance themselves in public all the time, avoid any place indoors or outdoors with crowds that are large enough to violate said anti vaxxers self imposed social distancing mandate, stop traveling far or travel restricted, don't have anyone over their houses (and vice versa) or only do so if it would have been approved during the pandemic etc.  This is not necessarily out of spite,  its just for consistency sake (can't magically tell anti vaxxers to go back to normal so this hammers that point home) and to hammer the point home to anti vaxxers that while they couldn't stop the government and their henchmen from taking away their 'freedoms' (ymmv) during the pandemic the anti vaxxers can however stop the pro vaxx crowd from brainwashing them and others to go back to normal after the pandemic by living as restricted post pandemic as they did during the pandemic for the rest of their lives since they can't mandate anti vaxxers the opposite way of how they mandated them during the pandemic (ie they can't force anti vaxxers to travel or to not self isolate or to have tons of people over at their houses etc).   Plus if doing the above things shuts up those SJW anti vaxxers than that's goo dtoo

I support Defensive Democracy in some cases when I deem it justified (and I would never support Defensive Democracy in situations where it  excessively repressed of civil rights).  Defensive democracy is a collections of laws, legislation that is delegates and court rulings which limit specific rights and freedoms in a Constitutional Republic Democracy in order to protect the existence of the state and its character, human rights and institutions. Defensive Democracy refers to major conflict that could come about in a Democratic Constitutional Republic country between adherence with such country’s values,  (like freedom of association, the right to be elected, and between preventing parties, groups and peoples who are anti democratic from abusing these principles. vaushism liberal socialism  sounds right but left

I am fine with Left Neoconservatism in rare instances vaush liberal socialism also sounds right but left

I support Pro Western Leftism  vaushism liberal socialism, also sounds right but is left

Fringe Right 

I am sort of a Left Wing Anti Communist  (some nazbol spectrum etc)

I very much empathize with Radical Feminists’-Terf feminists' negative views of transgender people since transgender women are a threat to us destroying the sexist Male patriarchy and bringing in true equality between the sexes/genders which is what I want. This new system that transgender women are preventing the creation of, would allow a whole new system where sex and gender don’t matter , where there is no such thing as sex/gender roles and where there is natural and true equality between the sexes/genders from the start (which would prevent the things that cause guys to be sexist in our current Male patriarchal system). If we continue to allow transgender women to hijack what it means to be a woman, we will be forever bound to this oppressive Male patriarchy where women will only get equity and parity instead of true freedom and equality .Transgender women NEED to help women not settle for equity and parity in our existing male patriarchal system by using gender stereotype acceleration to light a fire under women to break down our male patriarchal system to give true equality to all women. It’s the only way transgender wonen can redeem themselves for hindering my feminist goals.

I am against open borders and illegal immigration , mostly because we need borders (ideally stronger borders) in our current pre transitional and transitional change from Capitalism to Marxist Leninism to avoid conflict with and capitalist influence from capitalist countries (A lot of our migrants [god bless their heart] come from Capitalist or Capitalist adjacent countries).  Stronger borders mean less of that bourgeois capitalist conflict and influence (which we get now from mass migration, chain migration, illegal migration etc) as we lay the ground work for and begin to transition from a Capitalist country that sadly treats migrants like second class citizens to a Marxist Leninist ‘open border’ migrant utopia country.  Stronger borders aren’t for restricting migration, strong borders are for restricting capitalism and by extension the bourgeois and aristocratic baggage that comes with it (which by doing so will help the legal and illegal migrants who are already living in the US get richer and more equality since the closer we get to a Marxist Leninist society the more income equality grows and barriers between classes shrink which can only happen by stronger borders to prevent capitalistic barriers to this transition) to create a post Capitalist country that will be extremely more pro migrant than a capitalist country with lax or open borders can ever be. A little less migration NOW for MUCH MORE migration in the future  Think of this like putting a tourniquet on a huge wound to stop the bleeding, here strong borders would stop the bleeding done by the commidifaction and abuses of capitalism , allowing our country to move to become Post Capitalist at which time the bleeding (ie the cronies of capitalism) will stop and we will be in Marxist Leninist utopia with open borders and as pro of a migrant country as we can have all thanks to transitioning from Capitalism to Marxist Leninism which cannot be done with the pettiness of capitalism pouring into our country via mass migration, illegal migration and chain migration  I advocate protection of all workers rights no matter country of origin  So everything I write below is for the US until we usher in a Marxist Leninist revolution (and further cemented via an ushered in pan Marxist Leninist revolution) and also because I am being contrarian (being pro migrant is a mainstream ‘liberal’ view to have, being like I am on migration is contrarian). However I  do not have a strong stance on migration so don’t get triggered if what I write below is not liberal enough in migration  tankie marxist leninism also sounds right but left

I believe the US should seriously look into building two offshore Autonomous Republics just for migrants, illegal migrants etc. Those two lands would be Autonomous Republics of the United States (similar to how Crimea is a Autonomous Republic of Ukraine).  Migrants/illegals etc would be given assistance from NGOs or indirectly from US government to move to these two US Autonomous Republics as an alternative to moving to the US mainland

All migrants and illegal migrants around the world would be able to move to these 2 US Autonomous Republics , as easy as migrants/illegal immigrants to the US would have been able to move to the US from the 1870s through early 1920s (which was very liberal)  IF this Labour Party UK type of migration system : https://labourlist.org/2019/09/labour-conference-approves-motion-to-extend-free-movement/ (which is almost open borders)     was fused with that 1870s through early 1920s migration system (which was very liberal)

Most of my views on migration and illegal migration match the anti migrant/anti illegal immigrant Left Wing Europeans views on migration and illegal immigration (but ONLY for migrants/illegal immigrants to the US mainland in all 50 states NOT for any migrants or illegal immigrants in the above two US Autonomous Republics since I want the latter to have barely any migration/illegal migration restrictions

I am not against woke CRT housing policies like at Williams College or the VA and I very much tolerate those policies I am not against woke CRT things like black graduations or Family of Color playground night and I somewhat tolerate those policies  My reason is because those policies are an attempt to make those places more inclusive and unified (and less divisive) for all races and ethnicities, those policies might actually help BIPOC+ feel more solidarity with each other so maybe they can focus on positive ways to fix perceived ills than negative ways and also because I am a libertarian.

I am ok with National Anarchism (mostly because it is anti racialization) 

I am somewhat to pretty much a Western values Egoist Anarchist (not Western Chauvinist)

If White Nationalists want to live apart from minorities they should pool their money together and form a commune off the grid or out in the boonies. They should not try to force their White Nationalist will on our country since White Nationalism is wrong and bigoted ( Fash creep S Sunshine)

In this role I would push White Nationalists to read this link https://web.archive.org/web/20220524210933/https://www.facinghistory.org/educator-resources/current-events/explainer/white-nationalism  so they can try to stop being White Nationalists and fix their problems the way the article says they should. I would also probably in that hypothetical situation, become a fusion of pitful and empathetic toward Left Wing Identity politics (like Mexican Nationalism) to offset that a bit (but I wouldn't support Left Wing Identity politics)

I support strategic autonomy 

I support the Trump vaxx and I believe people should get the Trump vaxx to show their love of Donald Trump and appreciation for his work. Donald Trump saved this country by helping create the Trump vaxx