Nat Soc Far left blog
Nat soc
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html
I am a Social Democrat (pre policy regime . which included nat soc type ideologies and the mid to late 1910s European variety of SocDem ie Yellow Socialism , Peronist
Outside of Labour Party Social Democracy, I support the (including some aspects of and Agrarian Socialism)
I like …. post Dengist Marxism Leninism (like in modern China) equally China nazbol
Peronism
Unlike in China, there would be a People’s Democracy (auth dem like peronism also meshes with Marxism Leninism) which would allow multiclass and multi party democracy along the path to socialism. Low class, petite bourgeoisie and progressive bourgeoisie would also be allowed to participate in this greater proletarian movement that would be determined by and part of a broad social base that would underline peaceful socialist revolutions. .This is because the People’s Democracy recognizes that the working class are not necessarily an impediment, and could be used to mobilize and serve as the basis for building a state that as mentioned below has corporatist elements that would align labor interests with at least a large sect of the national bourgeoisie to promote a Civic (National culturalish) Patriotic (National) Collectivism-Communitarian (sim to socialism so nat soca) agenda as mentioned below peronism patriotic rpl national
..people would be the ‘masters’ of the country (with Kids being the only ‘privileged’ class. peronism)
(improving people's lives and well being as the primary goal of development and the mediation of tensions between the societal classes, with the state responsible for negotiating compromise in worker-boss conflicts latter peronism)
This system would balance the right of the individual and society peronism.
Like in Peronism this would be a centralized government, with an organized State and a free people pernism. It would be a political, economic and social doctrine peronism
Some select large corporations would be nationalized in a way that blurred distinctions between corporations and government.So there would be a corporatist element to this system. peronism
One way to describe at least a small labor aspect of this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) system would it is in at least small part an alliance between the trade unions and the caudillos peronism
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) workers' unions are under state management (but some of them would be corporate instead but cede much freedom to strike in exchange for the state assuming the role of negotiator between conflicting interests peronism) there would be healthcare that is between the free healthcare under Peronism and the current healthcare model in China, a progressive tax code, (with the lowest bracket being 3 percent and the highest bracket being 45 percent) It would subsidize electric vehicles, implement a public bike system that would be run by several companies
In this Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China) , low income housing projects would be created and workers' recreation centers would be created throughout the US. Workers would get more paid days off than white collar workers currently do in the UK (regardless if those days off are used for vacation trips or just taking a break from work), jobs would pay half the money of their employees medical related trips and moving expenses. There would be more worker co-ops than there is now and for those worker co-op workers only there would be more paid vacation benefits than in the US and UK. There would also be raised minimum wage and safety regulations along with a more inclusive SSI system peronism
I support free education to all who qualify and working students should be given one paid week before every major examination peronism but not until we become a Marxism Leninism (post Dengist) society (like in modern China)
mostly Nat Soca
In this transition to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society or even in this USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society, I would support fiscally responsible Keynesian government spending (fiscally responsible Keynesianism like the Keynesianism that was employed by GWB and Ronald Reagan or that was employed in the early mid 20th century, i.e Weaponized/Military Keynesianism) on things like public works (i.e Keynesian style of government/deficit spending spending) when the economy needs a boost due to things like inflation, deflation, depressions, recessions using the exact type of) fascism ie itala
My combined economic views can be best described either as a mix of USSR like planned economy (ie like the one under Marxism-Leninism/Josef Stalin)/Multipolar Organic sociological (sociological held common lands together, common zeal)Socialism and the type of retroactive hypothetical Capitalism that would have existed in the US in the early to early mid 20th century IF that early to early mid 20th century retroactive hypothetical US Capitalism was a fusion of Humanistic/Compassionate Capitalism and Inclusive Capitalism/the democracy that the United States has managed since FDR (and that was noticeably growing stronger in the early 2000s and is still growing stronger today) how wikipedia described nat soc but i added humanistic comp cap to ease early 20th century cap , managed democracy which scholar compared us since ww 2 to ndsap germany
I support Anarcho Monarchism (goes w totalarian theme)
Maybe hopefully this Communistic society would morph into a society that is a Christian Communist society like in the Book of Acts or in small communes (with some elements of Agrarian Socialism nat soca related).
One aspect of my combined fiscal views is the belief that corporate competition empowers the economy and I echo that belief
This USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society would have a state inducing economy which values privatization (privatization that is a fusion of Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic policy privatization and this type of left wing lockean type privatization nat soca) as that is compatible with encouraging competition and can be used to fuel economics in that society
https://myprogxview2x.blogspot.com/2022/08/priva.html nat soca
We would first need to diminish markets that self regulate and scale back free marketism. Free marketism (as in Free Market capitalism) is not something people can rely on even in a transitional phase to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society and it rubs a lot of people the wrong way hence my views on it. We would switch to a centrally planned free marketism which fixes these issues as we transition nat soca
I support balanced budgets
I am Anti International Communism
Corporations would then be pitted against each other as a way to fix the issues with the State Capitalism transitional part of this phase to USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism and to move us more smoothly to a USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society since corporate competition empowers the economy and causes class struggle and analysis and I echo that belief
In this eventual USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society the USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism would partly be a type with USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism that doesn't have democratic hierarchal structures (order) (i.e has a social scale and has a ‘normative’ Marxist structure of the core inner circle of educated urban intellectuals within the party that has major say in the affairs of the working class) nat soca rpl nat soca elitism with austromarxist ‘normative elitism’
I am against Materialism. Materialism is unneeded. True happiness is not found in Materialism. Materialism is hollow, shallow, greedy and wrong. . The ills of Capitalism have caused Materialism and we need to defeat Capitalism to defeat Materialism
I loathe a lot of parts of Communism. I am a generally an anti communist
They would also get more input from the government or NGOs to ensure more fair labor practices and get our economy stimulated, and to help employers and employees instead of just employees (nat soca). This essentially would be worker co-ops
This would make businesses stronger as it would build bonds between the employers and their employees ,each with their own unique contributions to make. This essentially would be worker co-ops
I like an economic system where no matter how much you contribute to that work, you work is valued by the government and country. This work helps you become valued in society.
I am pro big business and would want a society that values big business nat soca (including bringing Guilds back if there are monopolies and allowing Guilds to be widespread as they were in the Middle Ages, effectively granting these individual guilds in many different industries, especially in the online sphere xi) if we can’t transition to be a Marxist Leninist society
I believe we and politicians should relate to the common people
I'd want strict rules preventing fraudulent monetary loans and fraud itself
I don't care for welfare but until we are in our Marxist Leninist society (or in our current static capitalistic society) I would use privatized welfare (but not for people who don't want to work, people who abuse welfare, people who can get better benefits outside of welfare etc) nat soca
I also want (until we are in our Marxist Leninist society or in our current static capitalistic society) semi private charities (privatization part is a fusion of Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic policy privatization and this type of left wing lockean type privatization nat soc) set up to help struggling Americans. These charities would rely on private donations from Americans to help other Americans (Americans would be incentivized to do so) nat soca
I believe that people ought to be economically self sufficient. To quote the USSR “ Therefore, the ground principle of our society was he/she who does not work, neither shall he eat”
Having all sociofiscal classes harmonize and not battle in order to together make society grow is also a good thing. Taxing the rich is good to encourage this system
I support commitment to robust protections for just possessory claims (left left lib)by producing classes (nat soc). But I believe that protections shouldn’t cover objects with the aid of the state or through violence or that were abandoned (left lib) or similar just exceptions (nat soc). This type of system is grounded in common solidarity and Christian Democratic jingoist unity (unity as in Joe Biden unitistas former label for his ‘nationalism’, combined Christian Democratic label [Joe Biden would be a Christian Democrat in Europe] is same as Joe Biden unistas without saying it , JB has a weird mix of nationalisms, jingoist pushes it to the right but not as far as ethno nat) taken together is similar to this original ‘We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one."
In this USSR/traditional Marxism Leninism society, the production tools be private (privatization that is a fusion of Vladimir Lenin’s New Economic policy privatization and this type of left wing lockean type privatization nat soca) while the production is for the betterment of the US instead of personal gain
In our current static capitalistic society, I want the US to bridge the gap between small business people and workers via commerce councils
I believe businesses should be able to be assisted for purchasing things for their businesses via tax breaks
I believe families should be able to have tax benefits and more flexible dependent laws are created to help families who have significant amount of people living with them
I support some social patriotic pensions
I support various forms of protectionism (critics call this mercantilism which is nat soca)
My views on Build Back Better are based on one or more of my fiscal views that I wrote above. However I believe infrastructure development should also have indirect incentives including tax reductions with more direct funding in road, rail and other transportation projects.
I believe people should be sociable and patriotic
of causing less births (which I don't want since I am against Population control), then I would be against this tax unless I found some way to have this tax be legal while at the same time not causing less births. If this idea I have caused less births, then to offset it, I'd want the government to give tax breaks to families who have kids, and the more kids families they have, the more tax breaks they get (until the birth rate goes back to before this system was implemented)
I support vitro fertilization and egg transplants if that can comply with Christianity, otherwise, I am alt apolitical lean fourth political position on that issue. eugenics
I believe that people should marry others who have more than a lot of things in common with them. It's vital that people marry other people who share most (or nearly most) of their political views. Why would Democrats-Liberals and Progressives want to have their children inherit Republican-Conservative traits from a Republican-Conservative parent? eugenics
I support advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). I support sequencing and mapping of the human genome. I support these things as a way to eliminate disease, make humans live longer, have humans become more intelligent and better adjustment to the conditions of society I support Ancestral Nutrition. Eugenics
I believe that children need to be taught ways to better differentiate between colors. When I was a kid, I always was drawn to the clear differences of each color (like when I viewed different color bumper cars , different color gas station pumps, different color toy letters-toy numbers etc). int marriage eugenics
As long as health care providers provide resources to help pregnant women who are pregnant with a baby with down syndrome raise their baby with down syndrome, personally and systematically, I basically support laws making it harder (as in abortion in Texas new pro life law hard, but not illegal) for pregnant women to abort babies with down syndrome if their reason for aborting that baby is because the baby has down syndrome. However, legality wise, I am Christian Democratic on this issue. eugenics
I support quality housing with affordable pricing.
Even though I am no fan of Left Wing Identity politics and Left Wing Nationalism fused with Socialism in One country, I begrudingly admit that Left Wing Identity politics and Left Wing Nationalism fused with Socialism in One country, at least seemingly improves the rights of all marginalized groups in the US. Eventually in the future once Left Wing Identity politics and Left Wing Nationalism fused with Socialism in One country, reaches its intended goal and there is no need from far lefters to have Left Wing Identity and Left Wing Nationalism fused with Socialism in One country, politics anymore, it will make our country as a whole less divisive, more united and thus more motivated to prevent regressing on that issue. Any actual injustices committed against whites in such a new world (which would be extremely rarer than it is now) will no longer be tolerated or accepted by anyone, not even by far left woke people thus not giving White Nationalists even the appearance of an excuse for their evilness. So basically Left Wing Identity politics and Left Wing Nationalism fused with Socialism in One country, can have a trickle down effect to help White Nationalists not be White Nationalists like how Capitalism can have a trickle down effect to help poor people. Regardless, White Nationalists should love our country and its people and stop being White Nationalists or leave it. socialism in one country sounds like nat soc, LW nationalism is left wing WN combined similar to nat soc
I am Pro European Union. I am a European Union-United States partnership Identarian. doubles for ar
I am against Globalism (just like many unions in the US are against it). I also see positives of radical localisim and feel radical localism is better or could be much better than globalism. We need all of the liberals and liberal groups we have to fight against globalism
I am against Globalized Capitalism as that causes so much of the ills we have today in many countries
I am against Globalization
I am Pro Israel (I am Jewish) and I don't feel liberals labeled as left anti semetic are in fact anti semetic or that their views are anti semetic. Their views are wrong or ignorant or whatever but not anti semetic. I believe they should focus on other political issues instead of Israel related issues even if that means that those anti Israel/anti zionist liberals take a moderate position or even lean conservative position on said other issues that they normally would be progressive on if they kept lingering on the Israel/Zionism issues (better for them to focus on those other issues even if that leads them to be less than progressive on those other issues and be labeled DINOs than them lingering on the Israel/Zionism issue and being labeled anti semetic)
I support Anti BDS laws since I hate the BDS movement
I am Pro Israel (center right) on the Israel-Palestinian conflict because I am Jewish (so homerism). I have no forseeable or known issues with the Embassy of Israel being moved to Jerusalem.
The Israel-Palestinian conflict , since 2003 has been like this:
I am pro Israel between most of the most and the vast majority of the time, but I always briefly oscillate to being Pro Palestinian along with me viewing the more fringe parts of Hamas and Hezbollah in the same way that modern progressive or liberal Atheists view the God of the Judeo Christian bible (but in a slightly more sensitive way). While I am in this Pro Palestinian mode, I also view the Palestinian Liberation Army and moderate parts of Hamas and Hezbollah as tolerable 1990s Anti Heroes. However, even in this Pro Palestinian mode, I still favor Israel's right to exist and on the record and morally (morally as in moral victory) their settlements in the West Bank (but off the record in this Pro Palestinian mode, I am more Pro Palestinian on the West Bank situation than I am on the record)
This temporary oscillation usually happens whenever I see the extreme fringe members of IDF kill innocent Palestinians. I get upset with Israel when I see senseless killings of innocent Palestinians, where I even view the extreme fringe of the IDF and the Israelis politicians who would be to the right of Menachem Begin/Herut party as being like the moderate members of ISIS for doing such dangerous things (sometimes when I am like this, I even sound like Amos Oz, Yehuda Elkana and Noam Chomsky on how 'bad' those fringe members of the IDF and Israeli parliament to the right of Herut are). But each time I temporarily oscillate to being Pro Palestinian, after cooling off, I always oscillate right back to being Pro Israel after seeing some suicide bombing by a Hamas killing innocent Israelis or I see some anti Jewish cartoons promoted by Hezbollah which triggers me.
Even when I am Pro Israel, I do have an intuitive understanding of the legit Palestinian grievances that they have with Israel. Moreover, even when I am Pro Israel, I don't view Hamas or Hezbollah as militants (technically) or terrorists per say (I view Hamas and Hezbollah the same way that RINOs in the Republican Party view the Freedom Caucus). Hamas and Hezbollah care for their people (but they unfortunately care more about their rockets), and are lovable rouges who ,at least part of the time aren't wrong. It's just they go too far, and sometimes do commit brutal, sickening terrorism (but they are not terrorists per say) that makes it impossible for me to support them because doing so would mean I support innocent people dying, and since I am a humane person who cringes at death, I can't support Hamas and Hezbollah due to their brutal violence when I am Pro Israel.
Realistically, Israel should have been reclaimed by the Jews centuries ago or as late as the 1920s.
It's important the Jewish people are encouraged to integrate in their countries in a way that helps those countries grow and their contributions to growing those countries is celebrated by those countries and the world. Jewish people should be encouraged to mass participate in all aspects of society in order to feel more included. Moreover, Jews should be encouraged to have representation in various institutions to connect with each other, represent each other and show solidarity with each other. Moreover, Jewish owned institutions are a good thing as they help people within the Jewish community help each other in ways others can't. Paula Hyman said as much in her book Jews in Modern France as she makes good arguments for Jewish assimilation and shows how France was a model for Jewish assimilation (for its time)
Jewish people should not be forced or even pressured to celebrate Christmas. Nobody should be forced or pressured to celebrate any holiday. I am glad that most Jews don't celebrate Christmas as its good to see some group of people ignore that holiday in the west. 45 percent of Americans would prefer to skip Christmas. 2 thirds of our planet don't celebrate Christmas.
I favor a binational solution (ie One Nation State) to the Israel-Palestine conflict, which could either be a twin regime federalist arrangement or a unitary state
If Palestinians feel they are being slighted by Israel they should be encouraged to apply for political asylum/refugee status in the US. We'll happily and somewhat more than conditionally take them. Many areas of the US are already Little Palestines and having more of them move to America and especially to those areas would be great for everyone.
I like the old school humanist and universal Zionism as I feel it was much better than modern Zionism. Modern Zionism is too Nationalistic for me.
Rashida Tlaib should not have given in to far left anti Israel zealots and she should have went to Israel/Palestine as she planned.
If Russia attacks the US then me and Ukraine (including Azoz Battallion ie Neo NDSAP Nazbols) will have a common enemy (Russia). Which would be like during World War I where Woodrow Wilson said that the US and the Allies had common enemies during World War I . In that case there would be no future for Russia since there would likely be a nuclear war in that hypothetical situation so it would be easy to be against Russia then. But Russia hasn't attacked us so that is only hypothetical
Comments
Post a Comment