Mark Twain Alex Keaton far right blog

Left-Wing Laissez Faire (Mark Twain supported laissez faire) https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

I am a Social Democrat (Third Way and by extension Liberal Socialist), Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Agorist) , Democratic (Left Rothbardian Paternalistic Conservative) Cap

I support the Labour Party UK (Blue Labour/New Labour/Third Way/Third Way Social Democracy)

Besides me supporting Labour Party UK Social Democracy, I also support Danish Social Democracy and some fringe forms of Social Democracy from the early mid 1920s through mid 1930s, especially from the mid late 1920s through the early 1930s which can be seen throughout this blog

I support Anarcho Monarchism (like Bane from Batman) in specific situations. I am generally against Monarchism as a whole

I supported the Southern Tea Party years back and would do so today if they came back

I agree with a few of Barack Obama's economic recession reforms including Demand supply economics. When our economy is that like it was in the late 2000s it needs a boost from the government like that to fix it

I want to use either Democratic Socialism with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning with some form of market socialism (some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning) OR Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy to lead to us an eventual State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China)

OR

I want to use Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) ,Agorist) to lead to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society

Path to a State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China) 

The Democratic Socialist transition path 

The Democratic Socialist transition path to a State Socialist society would have Democratic Socialism but with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning and or with some form of market socialism, some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning

In this phase there would seriously be less government regulation of business and trade. There would be deregulation to increase economic growth and to cut back unneeded funding

In this Democratic Socialist transition phase there would be no occupational licensing for jobs like dog walkers and barbers .Spending would be cut. These things should be done in a Democratic Socialist economy with free markets and minimal regulations that we transition to as we further transition to a State Socialist government (with Supply Side reform) who will then reverse course on this by allowing the state to step in

The Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path   

In this Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path, workers would have widespread self management within the framework of a Liberal Democratic market economy. They would vote to elect their managers and even directly own their workplace . 

Early on, in this Liberal Democracy with Market Socialist economy, limits would be placed on the government to protect it from degenerating into an autocracy or aristocracy. Direct Democracy would be established within the workplace and within the government. The transitional government would then exist as an institution to protect the rights of the individual from predatory corporations, authoritarian leaders, and corruption. All of this would be to make the transition to a State Socialist government more smooth and natural

Corporate donations (including donations from worker-managed collectives) would be banned. There would also be limits placed on the amount of money that private individuals could contribute to their electoral candidates. Competition between self managed corporations would be encouraged in order to prevent technological stagnation.

Eventually as we transition further to a State Socialist economy, there would be use of a local government to further social and public ownership of utilities before the state steps in truly socializing the Means of Production but in a all hands on deck sort of way that ideally makes everyone at least somewhat happy (public ownership is rightfully or wrongfully seen by a significant amount of people to be inefficient or undesirable). 

Thus this would lead to lead to a liberalization of a centralized State Socialist government

I support China’s Supply Side Reform like Alex Keaton supported Supply Side Economics on Family Ties, which I would want implemented in our future State Socialist government.

This State Socialist government that I want would use Supply side reform to forcibly extracting surplus from the working class and peasantry for the purpose of modernizing and green industrializing . Through Side Side reform and similar measures, the state acts as a public entity by re investing the accumulated capital into the society

Supply Side reform would allow the government to maintain prudent, neutral monetary policy and proactive fiscal policy.  They would do this to ensure housing supply through multiple channels, including renting.  This would focus on improving productive efficiency and promoting advanced industries and innovation, in the pursuit of high-quality development.

Supply Side reform would mean in depth institutional planning and long term adjustment. It would be necessary whether or not the economy is good but very necessary in a future State Socialist government. However, the supply side also has short term issues like eliminating the supply surplus. 

Eliminating the supply surplus along with releasing the excessive resources that are trapped inside it will improve the efficiency of resource that are used while promoting economic growth, which is the essence of supply side structural reform. “Zombie companies” in some regions rely on subsidies from local governments, which result in the decline of the whole industry's supply capacity. In this sense, supply side reform is a long term issue.  Supply side structural reform would focus on the “elimination of excess capacity”. In a broader sense, this would mean de stocking, de leveraging and cost reduction. 

The capacity would not be released while the next round of growth wouldn’t occur if such measures were not taken. Eventually, the economy would escape its slow performance, abnormal state and deflation, and we would then see the results of supply side reform

The adjustment has an active meaning. When the economy is very hot, all enterprises have their orders. However, when the economy is in a downward turn, enterprises that have focused on product innovation and technologies in recent years are presented with greater advantages. Those enterprises that aren’t very professional and whom always think about speculations find themselves in the position of maybe being eliminated, merged or regrouped. 

When good resources are allocated to good enterprises, direct financing will cause better benefits will be while direct will play a bigger role.

Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Agorist) path to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society 

As per this, monopolies (like the patent monopoly, land monopoly etc) would need to be abolished

In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition, wealth would initially be distributed equally (freed markets naturally equalize wealth).  People would be paid in proportion to how much work they do and that exploitation or usury was taking place if they weren’t working.

Employers would still be able to own companies or workplaces in several different areas as long as the employer pays their employees the full value of their labor. 

In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition people would get paid in proportion to how much labor they did and that exploitation or usury would take place if they were not doing that labor 

Land titles would not be granted to unused land since an individual should use land continually in order to retain exclusive right to it, as to avoid land monopolies. In this Anarcho Individualist-Left Libertarian society we would use this type of property system, this type of property system and Benjamin Tucker’s type of property systems

There would be no state protection of the banking monopoly, i.e. the requirement that one must obtain a charter to engage in the business of banking. 

Wages would be raided by deregulating the banking industry, so that competition in banking would drive down interest rates and stimulate enterprise. This would decrease the proportion of individuals seeking employment and wages would be driven up by competing employees. The same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up

In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition , in this market, unregulated banking would cause more money to be available and this would allow proliferation of new businesses that in turn would raise labor demand for labor. People would receive equal amounts of labor would receive equal pay and interests, profits, rents and usury would disappear

So these freed markets would cause more money to be available and in turn this would allow proliferation of new businesses which would then raise demand for labor. Thus this would vindicate the labor theory of value due to equal amounts of labor would receive equal pay.

The government would not be overthrown by violence. To get rid of the government, widespread education and passive resistance in forms such as refusal to pay taxes, the evasion of jury duty and military service and the non-observance of compulsion etc would be used. Once society reached this state, individual liberty for all would prevail as a matter of course

Inyhis Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition each person would reap the fruits of their own labor and no person would be able to live in idleness on an income from capital. This would a great hive to workers who would be prosperous and free individuals to carry on their production and distribution on the cost principle rather than a bureaucratic organization of workers organized into rank and file unions. As an aside, I am pro union . I see unions as intelligent and self-governing socialists because they promise the coming substitution of industrial socialism for usurping legislative mobism

Governments would exist consisting of any belief and in any shape, or form, but the governments would be supported by voluntary taxation and those people who chose not to pay the taxes wouldn’t get the benefits or protection of the voluntary government. Economically, there would be a socialist free-market system where employers would pay their employees the full value of their labor due to the abolition of legally-protected money and land monopolies.

Wage labor and the boss-worker relationship very well might be eliminated or nearly eliminated

These elements below also possalikely might be part of this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) stage but if they don’t mesh with the above system, they would serve as an alternative transition method. They are based specifically on Kevin Carson-Roderick Long , and we can use the label Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) interchangeably for them , as to distinguish them from the Benjamin Tucker variety above but they basically the same thing and same methods

In this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition there will be a strict application of natural rights, self-ownership, and totally unregulated radical free markets based on Austrian economics in a stateless society in order to "eat the rich"

Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition would retain the classical liberal ideas of self ownership MT and free markets. 

Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition free markets in this transition, taken to their logical conclusions would yield anti capitalist, anti corporatist, anti hierarchical and pro-labor society . This is because in a truly laissez faire free market, the ability to extract a profit from labor and capital would be negligible.

In this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition transition, to avoid private appropriation and accumulation and free competition causing unequal wealth distribution, the state would be stopped from transferring wealth to the wealthy (which they do by subsidizing organizational centralization in the form of transportation and communication subsidies) by focusing on organizational issues, decentralized manufacturing and the informal and household economies

Black markets and counter economics would be one of the methods used to help threaten the state authority and state capitalist class This is because Capitalism is an exploitative system based on privilege backed by the State

There would be alternate institutions built , piece by piece replacing the statist, capitalist, society. This would be a gradualist approach to dismantling and replacing the state with new forms of social organization. The culture of this society would be anti imperialist and thoroughly radically left wing on cultural issues as gender, sexuality and race-ethnicity

Somewhere in this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition stage, all 6 monopolies would need to be abolished to go along with this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition transition , as outlined here. These monopolies include the Agribusiness monopoly, the infrastructure monopoly, the utility monopoly, the security monopoly, regulatory protectionism, and the healthcare monopoly 

Using the existing market, producer and consumer cooperatives, small enterprises, mutual aid institutions, do-it-yourself collectives, community gardens, credit unions, etc would be initiated. These wouldn’t tend to directly conflict with Capitalist institutions. The state would also be influenced through pressure groups and lobbying. The main effort would be the creation of alternate institutions. At some point these would become strong enough to challenge the state.

During this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire)  transition , the Capitalist and Statist privileges would be removed from the free markets. There would eventually be voluntary cooperation and exchange. These freed markets would have no corporations or a social hierarchy. The lower class would thus be liberated and all exploitative hierarchies would thus be abolished to create this freed market .These will thus be freed markets (eventually liberating the lower class). Basically economic nationalism MT with the subordination of market mechanisms to the national economy concerns

You can have free markets without Capitalism because Capitalism originally never referred to a free market but to a statist class in which capitalists controlled the state with the state intervening on their behalf

The entrepreneur would be the driver of this new freed market instead of the Capitalist and state benefited Capitalist (typically one in the same) .

These articles expands on what would happen in this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) transition to our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society

These freed markets would yield our eventual State Socialist economy that has Supply Side reform (like in China) Alex Keaton but Chinas version

I am generally against Monarchism as a whole. M.T

I support China’s Supply Side Reform like Alex Keaton supported Supply Side Economics on Family Ties

I support China’s Supply Side Reform like Alex Keaton supported Supply Side Economics on Family Ties, which I would want implemented in our future State Socialist government. This State Socialist government that I want would use Supply side reform to forcibly extracting surplus from the working class and peasantry for the purpose of modernizing and green industrializing . Through Side Side reform and similar measures, the state acts as a public entity by re investing the accumulated capital into the society

Supply Side reform would allow the government to maintain prudent, neutral monetary policy and proactive fiscal policy.  They would do this to ensure housing supply through multiple channels, including renting.  This would focus on improving productive efficiency and promoting advanced industries and innovation, in the pursuit of high-quality development. Supply Side reform would mean in depth institutional planning and long term adjustment. It would be necessary whether or not the economy is good but very necessary in a future State Socialist government. However, the supply side also has short term issues like eliminating the supply surplus. 

Eliminating the supply surplus along with releasing the excessive resources that are trapped inside it will improve the efficiency of resource that are used while promoting economic growth, which is the essence of supply side structural reform. “Zombie companies” in some regions rely on subsidies from local governments, which result in the decline of the whole industry's supply capacity. In this sense, supply side reform is a long term issue.  Supply side structural reform would focus on the “elimination of excess capacity”. In a broader sense, this would mean de stocking, de leveraging and cost reduction. 

The capacity would not be released while the next round of growth wouldn’t occur if such measures were not taken. Eventually, the economy would escape its slow performance, abnormal state and deflation, and we would then see the results of supply side reform The adjustment has an active meaning. When the economy is very hot, all enterprises have their orders. However, when the economy is in a downward turn, enterprises that have focused on product innovation and technologies in recent years are presented with greater advantages. Those enterprises that aren’t very professional and whom always think about speculations find themselves in the position of maybe being eliminated, merged or regrouped.  When good resources are allocated to good enterprises, direct financing will cause better benefits will be while direct will play a bigger role.

I agree with a few of Barack Obama's economic recession reforms including Demand supply economics. When our economy is that like it was in the late 2010s it needs a boost from the government like that to fix it (GDG said Alex Keaton would have supported that)  Supply side reform

Michael J Fox who played Alex Keaton supported Pete Buttgieg for President, Pete Buttgieg is a Democratic Capitalist   I am a ..  Left (Wing Laissez faire) Rothbardian Democratic (Paternalistic Conservative) Cap

mix of Democratic Capitalist (like Pete Buttgieg who Michael J Fox who played Alex Keaton supported), Paternalistic Conservative, Left Rothbardian and Left Wing Laissez Faire property rights:

If we aren’t ready to transition to an eventual State Socialist economy like I mentioned above (and must endure a capitalistic economy) , then we must enact policies which make our current capitalistic system more left, charitable and compassionate.

For this to happen we would need to create a system within our capitalistic government with an autonomous demcap (but neither supportive of the individual or the state in principle patcon) democratic state enactment of policies (demcap) with greater state intervention when necessary (patcon) which in effect create a compromise between upper and lower classes (with a balance between the two depending on what is most practical patcon), while remaining compatible with free market capitalism. 

This would mediating social class conflict and cater to the demands of work (demcap) with principles such as duty, structure and organicism,(patcon). Top-down policies and bottom up initiatives (i.e goal settingpatcon) implemented by democratic governments (as benevolent paternal figures patcon) to cultivate a good life for all citizens. There would be state intervention as seen below but not really a command economy 

Under this system, with moderately regulated (government intervention when necessary) and populist market capitalism (patcon) it would establish cooperative economic institutions. 

These cooperative economic institutions would include institutions that facilitate bargaining between government bodies (to set goals and ensure fair play and equal opportunity patcon) and business and labour organizations such as unions, and those entities that regulate the relationships between employees and management within private firms.

The development of institutions to promote this cooperation among public and private economic entities would acknowledge the benefits of market competition, while it attempts to address the social problems of unrestrained capitalism demcap often with government regulation of markets in the interests of both consumers and producers.(patcon)

Economic security concerns of citizens under this system are addressed through redistributive (demcap patcon)/distrubitist (patcon) policies. These policies would include income transfers like welfare payment programs and pensions, to support the elderly and poor’s financial needs.

Other policies involved in this system to promote economic security would be social insurance, and the fiscal financing of education and job training programs to stimulate employment demcap . These would have more emphasized safety nets to deal with poverty patcon

Under this system, a right to private ownership of productive property would be a central tenet, and would be recognized as a basic liberty of all citizens, as in a regular free-market capitalist economy (i.e Democratic Capitalist private property system). But it would also have elements of a Left Rothbardian private property system

This would address the social entitlement and justice concerns through the preserving like I wrote above the private property rights of citizens, allowing citizens to be free, equal, and self-governing

Then after enough time in this society we can shift toward a Pan Secessionist, Bioregional and maybe Libertarian Municipal society to finally reach our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist utopia, albeit not in the ideal way or using the ideal methods   fash creep

This should help transition us to an upgraded welfare state that is a fusion of universal welfare, Third Way SocDem workfarist policies like Working Families Tax Credit, National Childcare Strategy, National Minimum Wage, expanded America Works program (with GONGO added to America Works existing structure to make America Works be sort of pseudo Nationalized), TANF emergency funds and a more moderate to strong demcap (i.e Nordic model type patcon) expansion of a welfare state 

I support what I consider free trade and free enterprise (ie commerce).  M.T

I am can lukewarmly condone Lee Atwater's fiscal-welfare views but ONLY for left acceleration reasons and ONLY when his fiscal-welfare views are fused with Humanistic Capitalism/B Sanderism, Free Market Proto-CapCom (yellow socialism) and Welfare Chauvinism, otherwise I am against his fiscal-welfare views even if they lead to left acceleration  

I support property rights and privatization to the extent that I write below. I support the rights of private property owners to the extent that I write below. Property rights as I write below are more important than personal rights  M.T

I support Property rights as a contingent yet very constrained social strategy, that is reflective of the importance of multiple, overlapping rationales that call for separate ownership and of natural law principles of practical reasonableness, defending robust yet non-absolute protections for these rights in a manner .These are ground in a clear statement of the natural law basis for the view that solidaristic wealth redistribution by individuals is at times morally required. However,  as a response by individuals and grass roots networks to particular circumstances instead of a state driven attempt to achieve a particular distributive pattern.

We should advance detailed arguments for workplace democracy rooted in such natural law principles as subsidiarity, which we defend as morally desirable and as a probable outcome of the elimination of injustice rather than as something that is mandated by the state. Natural law approaches to land reform and factory occupation by workers. Rejecting natural law that grounds to intellectual property protections, while building on property rights more general and developing a general natural law account of boycotts.

I am ….. Anarcho Libertarian (including Anarcho Pete Buttigieg Democratic Capitalist).  MJF who played Alex Keaton supported Pete for Prez 2020, R Rgrn slso employed diff form of Dem Cap ad Prez, Alex was pro RR

I am not against people admiring self made rich people. I generally wouldn't do that personally, but I can understand why some people would admire them I between tongue and cheek pity and pretty much sort of sympathize with people who champion the rich of the 19th century like the Newport class . I look at certain rare rich people today being rich like Barack Obama looked at Donald Trump https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/333358-obama-equated-trumps-success-to-the-goal-of-the-american-dream-as-law/.  M.T

I am pro labor union , mostly because I champion the rights of workers and I don't want to see workers' rights trampled on by those liberal HR Departments who try to force those workers to be far left. So labor unions are a much better alternative . Plus labor unions are also anti globalist which is another huge plus. M.T

I am against inherited aristocracy  M.T

I am against people having a sense of entitlement  M.T?

The government should not increase the tax of people who profit from the sale of stocks ,bonds or real estate.  M.T?

‘I am against the government's attempts to regulate business and trade’ theme .M.T?

Society in our socioeconomic world is governed by consistance and precise laws. No individual or religous faction or political force should interfere with those laws. M.T?

We need leaders who are rich and intelligent. M.T

I am ok with cosmopolitanism