Left State Liberalism

 State Liberalism can be classified as one of the few Culturally Left ideology on the  AuthRight side.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

I support a Triangulation variant of a Neoliberal 2.0 (i.e State Liberal) and Third Way (Anthony Giddens true Third Way) version of J Bidenism Psuedo ‘Systematic Socialism/Socialism with Chinese characteristics’ that uses Degrowth commons-Social commons as specific double safety nets   https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/15/donald-trump/trumps-false-claim-biden-socialist

https://cole.house.gov/media-center/weekly-columns/bidens-build-back-socialist-plan  https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/07/biden-capitalism-socialist-gop.html https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-big-government-socialism-nothing-works https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_Biden&oldid=1873910 https://preview.redd.it/tj099u4uxzl81.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=9c57d3470a64e2d13a0c9467e40c29cf9b7579fa

I support our current economically lame society evolving into a Libertarian Communist (fiscally conservative), Triangulation variant of a Neoliberal 2.0/State Liberal and Third Way (Anthony Giddens true Third Way) version of J Bidenism (Psuedo ‘Systematic Socialism/Socialism with Chinese characteristics’) that uses Degrowth commons-Social commons as specific double safety nets

I am a… , Libertarian Communist https://www.reddit.com/r/chomsky/comments/tcpg3f/usa_now_a_libertarian_communist_state_claims/

Fiscally conservative (Blue Dogs) Libertarian Communism (faux i.e modern US and real) 

Fisc con LibCom Basically there would be Capitalism with less layers of rules, regulations (or more effective ag 3w) , laws, diff Affirm action (not none or less), taxes. 

Fiscon libcom In this future system, there would be less involvement from the federal, state, and local level government (or at least when it leads to inefficient or long term unsustainable [fiscon] outcomes ecolib), less special fees and more targeted (not less) registrations, lower cost of complying with these sets of restraints etc

libcom fisc conThrough workers’ movements worldwide, a very lot of nations would join the same markets but they wouldn’t be as attached to these global markets in a way where a recession or depression in the the US would make them be effected by said recession or depression (due in part to Alter Globalization being used instead of Globalization and more non interventionalism in foreign markets by the US ecolib faux libcom). too

In this future system, our government would try to do more with less spending (like real Libertarian Communism but with money, government and markets)    libcom real fiscon

These ‘more with less’ low economic spending policies would innovatevaley fiscon create pro working class policies libcom and efficiently fiscon delivered services that would meet human needs libcom including the need for a safe enviornment  libcom real  fiscon and that would find innovative ways to do more with less fiscon 

 There would be an all hands on deck (common ownership of things/blue dog compromise) approach and direct democracy (libcom real like) ,

In this future system, the economy would benefit everyone by trickling down from the workers who empowered it, in order to help everyone rise high equally libcom real fiscon 

In this future system, the government would raise taxes to balance the budget in order to create a surplus to allow more spending on programs to create or expand social equality policies    fauxlibcom fiscon  . 

This a way of organizing society would be based on the principle of 'from each according to ability, to each according to need' libcom fiscon. Eventually through this there would be no division between employers and workers, and rich and poor, there is no longer a need for a body of organised violence controlled by a small number of people, like the police, to protect the property of the rich and enforce poverty, wage labour and even starvation on everyone else. With no need to accumulate capital or make profit there is no longer the need for armies to capture new markets and new resources.  both libcoms and fiscon

In this future system, there would be tax cuts and less regulation (including less Equality of Opportunity) of business which would to increase liberty (like in the Declaration of Independence)  and property rights. This would truly allow a free society

In this future system, the government would help workers from co-ops, collectives etc by promoting work efficiency (allowing for the best workers) that is not stymied by big governments  livnbcon fiscon

libcomThe government would provide individuals a defense against loss of social standing through the insistence on equality, essentially abolishing all hierarchy in favor of a centralized system where all but a very few are the same in power, wealth, and status. fiscon libcom But only if the government could do this with reduced spending (since every dollar that the government spends is a dollar taken from workers, regardless of whether it is from debt or taxes) and after tax cuts (since tax cuts would result in economic growth leading in turn to higher government revenues)  fiscon montersry

FisCon libcom.   Instead of Anarchy we should have Anarcho Conservatism which is more early non socialistic New Deal than real socialistic New Deal (which would include at least either partly privatizing SSI or doing to SSI what Jo Jorgensen wants to do to it. prosperous lifestyles (as well as the best for the continual sustenance of a libertarian social order) which should be encouraged, especially via positive influence (not ostracism), employing covenant communities which may exclude those who violate common values (similar to economic liberalism),   and none or less subsides. toretain order,balance and paternalism set up

Triangulation variant of a Neoliberal 2.0/State Liberal and Third Way (Anthony Giddens true Third Way) version of J Bidenism (Psuedo ‘Systematic Socialism/Socialism with Chinese characteristics’)

to Center left ways to solve our problems in more assertive, dialogic way  bidenism ag 3w

There would be a socialistic version of a Nationalized Affordable Healthcare act  state liberal bidenism

In this system, the government would offer free reeducation for far right or alt right people state libersl bidenism

I support. build back better (so. Instead, they are aiming to either reduce the number of years funded at the start or eventually forcing the burden of paying for certain programs to the states. This should alarm every American since a package at any cost would still drastically expand the welfare state, massively increase taxes and destroy jobs for hardworking Americans, cause inflation to soar even higher and lead to heightened government control)  fisc con similar to third way ie center right neutering by blue dogs

In this future system, the government would repair damaged solidarities through divisive policies like any slippery slopes that come from  woke thought policing. ag 3w bidenism

This future system would have less authoritarian/big government in wealth distribution (3way ag bidenism) 

So this would mean in some areas there would be less market fundamentalism so more market control by Democrats than we have today (like in the Energy sector which they would be eco social fascists on right wing is eco fash social is to hide that eco fash is state lib like)   bidenism agiddens 3w

To put a leash on any socialistic path we take if implementing such socialistic policies creates tax burdens or deficit burdens that will hurt future generations when those Socialistic US society finally comes about  fiscon sim to ag 3way   bidenism

bolded means triangulation changes to socialism w chinese characteristics bidenism

Triangulation in the Multilateralism the US has with China  china  joe bibden

flexible financial markets (including way more voluntary interactions (libertarian anarchist left lib) with much less involvement of the state or with charity donations to the state to treat the markets as if they really are {reddit socialistic amendment to private policing of ancaps} free of the state  [libertarian anarchist left lib] etc) exist which permit private share ownership—a feature absent in the economic literature on market socialism; eventually as we become more Socialist, these markets will change their approach. Eventually in these markets there will be a system of conditional (but more of a formality type of conditional) private /property rights or where enterprises would be in private hands wherever it is viable . The transfer to private recipients public services that were previously provided by government. (i.e the government would also privatize previous public services)

The service and companies transferred to private ownership would belong to diverse sects. Industries would be privatized en mass by the government (including banks, railways, shipping channels, social insurance etc). State ownership wouldn’t be common unless it is for emergency (like huge war) situations but for those rarer cases there would be optional clauses This privatization would be within increased state control over the entire economy via interference and regulation. The government would regulate and control groups or syndicates of companies most of which would have previously regulated themselves.

There would be partnerships between the government and businesses .Companies would be encouraged to support the government’s economic goals but they wouldn’t really be punished if they didn’t do so state profits are retained by enterprises rather than being distributed among the population in a social dividend or similar scheme, which are central features in most models of market socialism

Common ownership including private sector groups with government officials in non government roles , citizen groups, GONGOs and NGOs in the socialist market economy which would consist of state owned assets (with less direct state influence ,really government would be used in the state asset manner primarily to step in ever so slightly to make sure the assets part is functional), Collective people owned enterprises (people would be collectivized and then own enterprises) and the Municipally owned shares of mixed enterprises 

and Peronist (De Francism variant)

Rich people should be encouraged to marry common people defranc and taxed more than AOC wants them taxed if they don’t 

I am majorly opposed to Monarchism and passionately opposed to Imperialism decfranc

Unfortunately there will always be at least some divide between the diversified elite and non elite de franc

Americans should believe in the political ideas I subscribe to whether they want to or not  state lib de franc

I support class consolidation defranc

I am ok with land redistribution defranc

I am an mostly Isolationist though I feel the US should make alliances with other countries to protect themselves.decfranc

Traditions like graduation outfits, some holidays, horse race attires, wedding ceremonies etc are oppression jaco de franc

There's no need to vote on whether or not we should counter all counter-revolutionaries.  jaco decfranc

We need to rally the people  jacob i de franc to create an autonomous revolution decfranc

I am ok with political hegemony but in a non woke way  de franc

I get triggered by some Authoritarian Right ideologies, but I am somewhat tolerant of most other ideologies. de franc

We need successful program of economic development without any foreign financing e franc

I support a Socialistic economy because socialistic economies take egalitarianism to the next level and I support next level egalitarianism   jacob decfranc  I support the US being the most egalitarian society in the Western Hemisphere like Paraguay was the most egalitarian society in the Western Hemisphere in the early 1850s  de franc

acy, and similar dissidents (in a Mccarthyist of the proletarian (bidenism 3 way since mccarthy not a dictator) sort of way i.e using Defensive Democracy (my addition)  [and or defranc De Francism takes away many individual freedoms and squashes dissent, it was still beloved by the people of Paraguay. De Francist] but in a way where the government would still beloved by Americans decfranco.)

I welcome political refugees from various countries like José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia did   defranc  

I support Socialism in one country over International Socialism  decfranc

Half of the land would be nationalized half the land in four stages.defr

I support a pluriethnic, plurilingual, and multicultural society similar to Paraguay under José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia de franc 

I support post Colonialism  decfranc 

We need to deal a hard blow to the old Capitalistic trade oligarchy. However, some elites should still hold some prominent positions decfranc  but we need to deal a hard de franc.This would be to allow other social classes to thrive de franc

Should give church and federal lands to homeless people in return for those homeless people being loyal ‘soldiers’ to the US including by being in high ranking political positions in a future participatory democracy de franc

K-12 Education for students who don’t intend to go to college should be compulsory. I support a 19th Century Paraguay type ‘ universal’ (free) elementary educational system that would reach a majority of even hard to reach BIPOC populations.de franc

I would like less involvement of the government in higher education decfranc also libertarian ecolib etc

I am neutral on some types of  private schools decfranc

I support religious freedom   decfranc . The Catholic Church and other churches should be Nationalized instead of being treaded on by the government without being Nationalized by the government decfranc

I support American exceptionalism decfranc

We need America to be a cultural smelting pot amagalation and to be more equal  to promote unity and solidarity In that effort, Francia was building on Paraguayan initiatives to eliminate racial difference

since Tony Blair state lib

I support a system where causes that with my political ideology have the full support of the state and the state acts in the interests of people who share my political ideology state lib uk since t blair 

I support the healthcare system (and upgrades to that system) that the UK government has had (and made) since the leadership of Tony Blair

I between turn the other way with and begrudgingly live with the pro transgender laws that that the UK government has enacted since the leadership of Tony Blair and will continue to enact in my lifetime 

I support…and the UK government in general since the leadership of Tony Blair.

State liberalish

There would be moral commitment to negative liberty with principles for restricting liberty on the basis of a unanimous agreement in which everyone's particular interests receive a fair hearing (sort of like direct democracy). Which should be done in our current society too if you think about it but only if it can fit within our current society’s system  lib  neolibierian  also jives w state liberal

With the markets in this system, citizens will be provided with enough material comforts to cause them to support the regime   . state lib related auth cap.    Markets would be used for social aims, including being used to give power to consumers to make their own decisions and act responsibly while not being brainwashed by consumerism and materialism third way

Chicago School, Neoliberal 2.0. economic liberal, monetary 

I generally support the Chicago school of economics and State Economic Liberalism-State Liberalism

In this evolved economy, the Chicago school of economics and State Economic Liberalism-State Liberalism would generally be employed. The economy would grow like it it did in Chile decades ago

These markets in this system would be free Market Authoritarian. The government would use modern technologies to suppress dissidence by counter revolutionaries, reactionaries,insurrectionists, people trying to undermine democracy, and similar dissidents (in a Mccarthyist of the proletarian sort of way i.e using Defensive Democracy but in a way where the government would still beloved by Americans similar to state lib and also decrancism)

in this future system would be heavily based on the concept of rational expectations ,active trust and generative politics. monterian then also ag 3w. It would value and aim for balanced budgets  state libeco lib

Moreover, there would be regulation (or more regulation) of the money supply by central banks (in the form of monetarism). There could be increased taxes in this future system to avoid deficit spending, but in this future system, there would be a preferable preference to decrease spending to avoid deficit spendingfiscon 

chic This would cause widespread deregulation, privatization (or future), and other free market policies (see below) that would be closely controlled economies (chic) with reduced government intervention in the economy (see belowchic or eco lib)  . 

Basically, indirect or less or government intervention and protectionism in the market economy when it inhibits free trade and competition but more government intervention to protect property rights and resolve market failures. (ecolib)

In this future system, the state would be strong and protect the rights of property, people , and enforce contracts (ecolib)

Moreover, there would be regulation (or more regulation) of the money supply by central banks (in the form of monetarism). There could be increased taxes in this future system to avoid deficit spending fiscon also reddit neolib, but in this future system, there would be a preferable preference to decrease spending to avoid deficit spending

This would cause widespread deregulation, privatization and other free market policies (see below) that would be closely controlled economies with reduced government intervention in the economy 

Basically, indirect or less or government intervention and protectionism in the market economy when it would inhibit free trade and competition but more government intervention to protect property rights and resolve market failures. 

I am ok with Ego Communism that is fused with the type of Individualism where a force of Individuals each bring their own unique reality to compliment each other in a moral relativist sort of way ?

Some forms of Anarchism have bad ideologies and fact checkers prove this

I am ok with natural monopolies as long as they align with most of my political views otherwise I want natural monopolies to be broken up like I want non natural monopolies to be broken up.?

My views of Welfare are based on two or more of the fiscal views I have above. We do need to reallocate welfare spending into pro gay Straight Pride Events and our military industrial complex

I support Queer Nationalism

I am a LGBTQ Leninism (cultural) explorer

I am glad that various major corporations (like American Airlines, Disney, MLB, NFL, Burger King etc) use LGBTQ diversity (in hiring and advertising) to hide the fact they have no (or effectively no) labor unions .   My reason is this: Discrimination of LGBGT people not only negatively effects LGBTQ but is bad to working class people of all stripes as any discrimination practices between demographic sections of the working class cause a very divisive practice hurting the development of working class consciousness , creating barriers to class unity to take away attention from class exploitation which bolsters the rich  So by ending LGBTQ discrimination via LGBTQ diversity practices at work and via advertising, those major corporations are helping all of their workers of all sexual orientations since without the distractions of anti LGBTQ bigotry which they prevent via those LGBTQ diversity practices, their workers attention is shifted to the evils of the rich corporate crony capitalists which would lead to the overthrow of those rich corporate crony capitalists, leading to the betterment of ALL people, not just LGBTQ in all aspects.  tldr. So these major corporations don’t need to prioritize giving labor unions to their workers because by those major corporations having LGBTQ diversity (at work and via advertising), it eliminates workplace anti LGBTQ bigotry, leading to a more harmonious and productive work environment for everyone, and an eventual socialistic revolution which will create a economically equal society for not just those workers of those major corporations but for all people in the US etc

I have a half hearted triangulation position on Postgenderism due to the , rightfully or wrongfully, irrerversible nature of postmodernism and extreme progressiveness.

If anyone is to blame for oppressing trans women or non abled POC etc, it is nature. Postgenderism wants to abolish or seriously alter the gender binary, as such a arbitrary binary causes bigots to be repress people. 

Postgenderism would abolish gender roles, but also to blur the line to the extreme between biological sexes by using biotechnology and neurotechnology. This would force sexists, cissexists and transphobes not be bigoted since differences between genders sex wouldn’t exist. I have a half hearted triangulation position on all of that

I always defend transgender people from Terf feminists since I believe transgenderism can accelerate women’s rights in unique ways that Terfs don’t understand

I was a fan of Everyday Feminism and Medusa Magazine until they went out of business because they spoofed the Regressive Left.  I felt the best way to expose how counterproductive, dangerous and ridiculous the Regressive Left was, was to spoof them and those 2 magazines provided that for me. I am glad that Everyday Feminism and Medusa Magazine existed. I've enjoyed spoof magazines since I was a kid and I read GamePro's yearly April Fool's Day section called 'LamePro' each April and get a kick out of the cool, weird and fake video games I unfortunately would never be able to play (thank you GamePro!) (reverse, anti regressive far left)

I am not against LGBTQQIP2SAAONPND+ people. I try to find stuff that unite me and LGBTQQIP2SAAONPND people up instead of divide us. If that makes I am not against LGBTQQIP2SAAONPND+ people. I try to find stuff that unite me and LGBTQQIP2SAAONPND pgobes think I am an ally of I am an ally of LGBTQQIP2SAAONPND+ people so be it.

I am between being pretty much tolerant of to being a fair weather apologist of the NAACP ?

Racist Right Wingers/Conservatives need to be privately confronted for their bigotry and if they don't change, they should be banished from the party or isolated forcing them to not be racist and change (sorry I don't make those rules, nature makes them and nature does not tolerate racism). 

One creative idea to make Right Wingers/Conservative racists become non racist against BIPOC+ would be to reprogram Right Wing/Conservative racists to become woke and CRT type of antiracist and to embrace the CRT. 

This way those Right Wing/Conservative racists can shift their hate target from BIPOC+ to whites (or at least shift their target from BIPOC+ to racist WHITES) and employ left wing, CRT anti white  'racism' (ie "BIPOC are equal to Whites but BIPOC+ are more equal than Whites", "whitey is bad whitey is bad"). This way those Right Wing/Conservative racists can channel their racism toward an acceptable target (whites and or racists) while holding on to their other Right Wing/Conservative views. . 

I pity Animal liberation activists. The reason why i don't outright hate them is because if they got their way it would backfire so badly and I love seeing liberal things backfire.

I am open to making animals LGBTQ to give them some diversity

I view people who needlessly pander and virtue signal in extremely tokenist efforts to wokeism (while being counterproductive) as Empathetic 1980s Anti Heroes Here are some of my fave virtue signals: https://www.reddit.com/r/virtuesignalling/

Maybe the best way to deal with transphobes is to give those transphobes ‘free helicopter rides’ in Chile and Argentina  Pinochetism

I see a platinum lining with California Assembly bill 979 which requires corporations to hire at least one director from an unrepresented community (defined as BIPOC+, LGBTQ etc) .That law is good because it shows the state is human and not robots, in creating such laws (meaning it shows that even states can be victims of being discriminatory).

I would be fine with more states enacting California Assembly bill 979 type laws, as long as those states who enact such laws also reform Affirmative Action for those type of jobs to fuse this Affirmative Action solution: https://books.google.com/books?id=VMZHuyK5NTsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA16#v=onepage&q&f=false  with the original Affirmative Action which for the latter is instead of saying 'this job is open to any applicant' and then not making any efforts to find minority applicants, the bosses actively try to find minority applicants through definite actions)as opposed to modern day Affirmative Action

Very deep down inside there is a significant Left Wing Populist inside of me?

I support Pan Nationalism that is fused with Degrowth  ?

We should break down all sexual and cultural differences ‘forcefully’ to make everyone feel more equal state liberals

We must have the ability to protect all minorities and oppressed people (and those who don't identify as "people") from far left Social Justice Weirdo freaks twisting the Christian and conservative things we say to falsely make it sound like we are speaking like ‘hate’   my twist 

I am Anti Reactionary (I am against reactionary behavior)

I would symbolically blindly support (accelerationism) the US being ruled by an autocratic state liberal/progressive , queer non-binary BIPOC person as that would be so over the top intersectionality wise it would force our country to stop being intersectional, sort of like letting a kid who whines about not having enough candy to literally lice in a candy factory for a week, they’d eat so much candy and get sick of it when they returned home after that trip, they’d never whine about not having enough candy again since they’d be sick of it

My western liberal progressive, SJW, views represent the views of the majority of oppressed people in the world who zi fight for

I am what Rev Al would call a 'Latte Liberal'

I believe that Transracial (identity) is a real concept and I support Transracial rights  state lib

We should use Post Pinochet type activism to combat the fascist Corpocracy in our country etc

Permanent revolutions are good because they change things in a manner where revoltions don’t take people by surprise since they are ongoing. 

Legality wise, I support UK government since 1997’s laws (and changes) for second trimester abortion

I like some forms of Maternalistic Feminism : Creating a lot of new jobs and roles that women are uniquely qualified while being moderate in reigning in Marxist Feminism at some point in the somewhat very distant future  (sort of)

I have a half hearted triangulation position on Postgenderism due to the , rightfully or wrongfully, irrerversible nature of postmodernism and extreme progressiveness 

If anyone is to blame for oppressing genders and sexes it is nature. Postgenderism wants to abolish or seriously alter the gender binary, as such a arbitrary binary causes bigots to be repress people. 

Postgenderism would abolish gender roles, but also to blur the line to the extreme between biological sexes by using biotechnology and neurotechnology. This would force sexists, cissexists and transphobes not be bigoted since differences between genders sex wouldn’t exist. I have a half hearted triangulation position on all of that

Women should get paid $10 for every dollar men get paid

I wouldn’t mind seeing pretty encouraged to semi mandatory Sixth Wave Feminism and Seventh Wave Feminism courses being at taught at colleges to offset those bigoted White Karen courses being taught at colleges and to help get our country ready one day to embrace Marxist like Feminism  (pretty encouraged to semi mandatory for students majoring or minoring in specific subjects)

I am an anti sexual abuse activist . I am also a Law and Order SVU fan. If I wasn’t a Christian, I would say that we should use Pinochetism type punishments on sexual abusers. But since I am a Christian, I will only say I ask that sexual abusers pay for there crimes to the fullest extent of our law

I can empathize with this view (but not agree with it) It would be great if blacks suddenly outnumber whites in the US etc and somehow get the power and position in the US from here on out that whites traditionally had while at the same time having whites be demoted and have the historical positions etc that blacks have had in the US in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s 1990s (ie blacks and whites switch places). I don't agree with that view however. It's just I am a fan of Trading Places type of movies /tv and can empathize with the above view.  If blacks were ever in position to really switch places with whites as noted above (even via Pinochetism methods), I would, beyond a reasonable doubt be an Honorary True Companion mercenary in helping them pull it off but since we are nowhere near that point, I will continue to only empathize with this view.  However my motive would be more wanting to shake things up as opposed to being a SJW.

Qanon is a myth and ficticious nonsense. We should use Pinochetism but with micro aggression non violence against people who believe those lies

I am against France and other countries banning Muslim women from wearing Burkinis and Burqas. I am fine with Muslim women wearing Burkinis and Burqas. Freedom of expression and freedom of religion are key pillars of our societies.  I believe that the anti Burkini and anti Burqa backlash is Islamaphobic while the anti Hijab backlash is ignorant.  Even if we pretend that the Burqa is a symbol of ‘oppression’ (which it is not), banning the Burqa is as bad or even worse than that pretend oppressive symbolism that the Burqa gives off. Muslims should use an Anarcho Pacifist form Pinochetism to counter such such Islamaphobia as Burkini bans and Burqa bans

I retroactively support the Red Army Faction (WG 1970s 1980s)   in spirit of state liberalism

I between symbolically and morally (moral as in moral support at Wikipedia RFA moral) support the ‘US Color Revolution’  :-J. state liberal

I am glad that us liberals use cancel culture because it proves we aren't snowflakes and can be tough and fight back. It's cool seeing us show that actions have consequences and to hold people responsible for their actions since it means the left values old school morals. However, I do not support cancel culture in some to the majority (give or take) situations. I am even tempted to become an anti cancel culture activist if it gets much worse from fringe left

I condone (but don't necessarily agree with) Gene Simmons saying that non vaxxed are the enemy

I actually like the covid mandates and restrictions because its good to see us Democrats get firm and tough on an issue (like the pandemic) instead of being pacifists (which we would be if we weren't firm and tough on people and in particular anti vaxxers during the pandemic) . A lot of Republicans falsely think we are weak and let people do anything they want on many political issues, so for us Democrats to be so firm and tough on people and in particular anti vaxxers in terms of mandates and restrictions during the pandemic shows the Republicans that they are wrong about us being weak and passive.

I like how equal and diverse Jonestown (Peoples Temple) was under Jim Jones. Obviously, the suicides and murders are indefensible as are the extreme and senseless abuse that kids endured there along with the other human rights violations committed at Jonestown.  Instead of mass murder and suicide, Jim Jones should have moved himself and the commune to the Soviet Union (while giving a plane ticket back to the states to anyone who didn't want to make the move and all people who were there with him involuntarily). Once there I would have wanted Jones and his commune to stop their human rights abuses and to live like the early Christians in the early book of Acts lived (while adopting pragmatic Christian Democratic ideologies fused with 1990s and 21sts century day Nordic political ideologies)

I moral (moral as in moral victory) support the Neoliberal subreddit’s version open borders

If we can't have the the Neoliberal subreddit’s version open borders (which as of now seems like a mirage) ,I would then prefer a   neoliberal reddit platform they are like state liberal

I think its cool that Joe Biden flys illegal migrants into the us in the middle of the night covertly. It is Cold War era covert US government military type of cool