Far right Paleolibertarian Bleeding Heart Libertarian blog

 I am a Bleeding Heart (Neoclassical) Libertarian-Paleolibertarian  https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

I am a Social Democrat (Third Way and by extension Liberal Socialist), Left-Wing Laissez Fairist-Anarcho Individualist (Left Wing Market Anarchist, Agorist) and Left (Wing Laissez faire) Rothbardian Democratic (Paternalistic Conservative) Capitalist

I am a Social Democrat (Third Way and by extension Liberal Socialist), Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Agorist) , Democratic (Left Rothbardian Paternalistic Conservative) Cap

I support the Labour Party UK (Blue Labour/New Labour/Third Way/Third Way Social Democracy)

Besides me supporting Labour Party UK Social Democracy, I also support Danish Social Democracy and some fringe forms of Social Democracy from the early mid 1920s through mid 1930s, especially from the mid late 1920s through the early 1930s which can be seen throughout this blog

I support Anarcho Monarchism (like Bane from Batman) in specific situations. I am generally against Monarchism as a whole

I supported the Southern Tea Party years back and would do so today if they came back

I agree with a few of Barack Obama's economic recession reforms including Demand supply economics. When our economy is that like it was in the late 2000s it needs a boost from the government like that to fix it

I want to use either Democratic Socialism with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning with some form of market socialism (some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning) OR Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy to lead to us an eventual State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China)

OR

I want to use Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) ,Agorist) to lead to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society

Path to a State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China) 

The Democratic Socialist transition path 

The Democratic Socialist transition path to a State Socialist society would have Democratic Socialism but with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning and or with some form of market socialism, some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning

In this phase there would seriously be less government regulation of business and trade. There would be deregulation to increase economic growth and to cut back unneeded funding

In this Democratic Socialist transition phase there would be no occupational licensing for jobs like dog walkers and barbers .Spending would be cut. These things should be done in a Democratic Socialist economy with free markets and minimal regulations that we transition to as we further transition to a State Socialist government (with Supply Side reform) who will then reverse course on this by allowing the state to step in

The Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path   

In this Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path, workers would have widespread self management within the framework of a Liberal Democratic market economy. They would vote to elect their managers and even directly own their workplace . 

Early on, in this Liberal Democracy with Market Socialist economy, limits would be placed on the government to protect it from degenerating into an autocracy or aristocracy. Direct Democracy would be established within the workplace and within the government. The transitional government would then exist as an institution to protect the rights of the individual from predatory corporations, authoritarian leaders, and corruption. All of this would be to make the transition to a State Socialist government more smooth and natural

Corporate donations (including donations from worker-managed collectives) would be banned. There would also be limits placed on the amount of money that private individuals could contribute to their electoral candidates. Competition between self managed corporations would be encouraged in order to prevent technological stagnation.

Eventually as we transition further to a State Socialist economy, there would be use of a local government to further social and public ownership of utilities before the state steps in truly socializing the Means of Production but in a all hands on deck sort of way that ideally makes everyone at least somewhat happy (public ownership is rightfully or wrongfully seen by a significant amount of people to be inefficient or undesirable). 

Thus this would lead to lead to a liberalization of a centralized State Socialist government

I support China’s Supply Side Reform like Alex Keaton supported Supply Side Economics on Family Ties, which I would want implemented in our future State Socialist government.

This State Socialist government that I want would use Supply side reform to forcibly extracting surplus from the working class and peasantry for the purpose of modernizing and green industrializing . Through Side Side reform and similar measures, the state acts as a public entity by re investing the accumulated capital into the society

Supply Side reform would allow the government to maintain prudent, neutral monetary policy and proactive fiscal policy.  They would do this to ensure housing supply through multiple channels, including renting.  This would focus on improving productive efficiency and promoting advanced industries and innovation, in the pursuit of high-quality development.

Supply Side reform would mean in depth institutional planning and long term adjustment. It would be necessary whether or not the economy is good but very necessary in a future State Socialist government. However, the supply side also has short term issues like eliminating the supply surplus. 

Eliminating the supply surplus along with releasing the excessive resources that are trapped inside it will improve the efficiency of resource that are used while promoting economic growth, which is the essence of supply side structural reform. “Zombie companies” in some regions rely on subsidies from local governments, which result in the decline of the whole industry's supply capacity. In this sense, supply side reform is a long term issue.  Supply side structural reform would focus on the “elimination of excess capacity”. In a broader sense, this would mean de stocking, de leveraging and cost reduction. 

The capacity would not be released while the next round of growth wouldn’t occur if such measures were not taken. Eventually, the economy would escape its slow performance, abnormal state and deflation, and we would then see the results of supply side reform

The adjustment has an active meaning. When the economy is very hot, all enterprises have their orders. However, when the economy is in a downward turn, enterprises that have focused on product innovation and technologies in recent years are presented with greater advantages. Those enterprises that aren’t very professional and whom always think about speculations find themselves in the position of maybe being eliminated, merged or regrouped. 

When good resources are allocated to good enterprises, direct financing will cause better benefits will be while direct will play a bigger role.

Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire, Mutualist, Agorist) path to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society 

As per this, monopolies (like the patent monopoly, land monopoly etc) would need to be abolished

In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition, wealth would initially be distributed equally (freed markets naturally equalize wealth).  People would be paid in proportion to how much work they do and that exploitation or usury was taking place if they weren’t working.

Employers would still be able to own companies or workplaces in several different areas as long as the employer pays their employees the full value of their labor. 

In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition people would get paid in proportion to how much labor they did and that exploitation or usury would take place if they were not doing that labor 

Land titles would not be granted to unused land since an individual should use land continually in order to retain exclusive right to it, as to avoid land monopolies. In this Anarcho Individualist-Left Libertarian society we would use this type of property system, this type of property system and Benjamin Tucker’s type of property systems

There would be no state protection of the banking monopoly, i.e. the requirement that one must obtain a charter to engage in the business of banking. 

Wages would be raided by deregulating the banking industry, so that competition in banking would drive down interest rates and stimulate enterprise. This would decrease the proportion of individuals seeking employment and wages would be driven up by competing employees. The same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up

In this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition , in this market, unregulated banking would cause more money to be available and this would allow proliferation of new businesses that in turn would raise labor demand for labor. People would receive equal amounts of labor would receive equal pay and interests, profits, rents and usury would disappear

So these freed markets would cause more money to be available and in turn this would allow proliferation of new businesses which would then raise demand for labor. Thus this would vindicate the labor theory of value due to equal amounts of labor would receive equal pay.

The government would not be overthrown by violence. To get rid of the government, widespread education and passive resistance in forms such as refusal to pay taxes, the evasion of jury duty and military service and the non-observance of compulsion etc would be used. Once society reached this state, individual liberty for all would prevail as a matter of course

Inyhis Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition each person would reap the fruits of their own labor and no person would be able to live in idleness on an income from capital. This would a great hive to workers who would be prosperous and free individuals to carry on their production and distribution on the cost principle rather than a bureaucratic organization of workers organized into rank and file unions. As an aside, I am pro union . I see unions as intelligent and self-governing socialists because they promise the coming substitution of industrial socialism for usurping legislative mobism

Governments would exist consisting of any belief and in any shape, or form, but the governments would be supported by voluntary taxation and those people who chose not to pay the taxes wouldn’t get the benefits or protection of the voluntary government. Economically, there would be a socialist free-market system where employers would pay their employees the full value of their labor due to the abolition of legally-protected money and land monopolies.

Wage labor and the boss-worker relationship very well might be eliminated or nearly eliminated

These elements below also possalikely might be part of this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) stage but if they don’t mesh with the above system, they would serve as an alternative transition method. They are based specifically on Kevin Carson-Roderick Long , and we can use the label Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) interchangeably for them , as to distinguish them from the Benjamin Tucker variety above but they basically the same thing and same methods

In this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition there will be a strict application of natural rights, self-ownership, and totally unregulated radical free markets based on Austrian economics in a stateless society in order to "eat the rich"

Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition would retain the classical liberal ideas of self ownership and free markets. 

Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition free markets in this transition, taken to their logical conclusions would yield anti capitalist, anti corporatist, anti hierarchical and pro-labor society . This is because in a truly laissez faire free market, the ability to extract a profit from labor and capital would be negligible.

In this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition transition, to avoid private appropriation and accumulation and free competition causing unequal wealth distribution, the state would be stopped from transferring wealth to the wealthy (which they do by subsidizing organizational centralization in the form of transportation and communication subsidies) by focusing on organizational issues, decentralized manufacturing and the informal and household economies

Black markets and counter economics would be one of the methods used to help threaten the state authority and state capitalist class This is because Capitalism is an exploitative system based on privilege backed by the State

There would be alternate institutions built , piece by piece replacing the statist, capitalist, society. This would be a gradualist approach to dismantling and replacing the state with new forms of social organization. The culture of this society would be anti imperialist and thoroughly radically left wing on cultural issues as gender, sexuality and race-ethnicity

Somewhere in this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition stage, all 6 monopolies would need to be abolished to go along with this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) transition transition , as outlined here. These monopolies include the Agribusiness monopoly, the infrastructure monopoly, the utility monopoly, the security monopoly, regulatory protectionism, and the healthcare monopoly 

Using the existing market, producer and consumer cooperatives, small enterprises, mutual aid institutions, do-it-yourself collectives, community gardens, credit unions, etc would be initiated. These wouldn’t tend to directly conflict with Capitalist institutions. The state would also be influenced through pressure groups and lobbying. The main effort would be the creation of alternate institutions. At some point these would become strong enough to challenge the state.

During this Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) and maybe Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire)  transition , the Capitalist and Statist privileges would be removed from the free markets. There would eventually be voluntary cooperation and exchange. These freed markets would have no corporations or a social hierarchy. The lower class would thus be liberated and all exploitative hierarchies would thus be abolished to create this freed market .These will thus be freed markets (eventually liberating the lower class). Basically economic nationalism with the subordination of market mechanisms to the national economy concerns

You can have free markets without Capitalism because Capitalism originally never referred to a free market but to a statist class in which capitalists controlled the state with the state intervening on their behalf

The entrepreneur would be the driver of this new freed market instead of the Capitalist and state benefited Capitalist (typically one in the same) .

These articles expands on what would happen in this Anarcho Individualist/Left Libertarian (Left Wing Laissez faire) Free market Anarchist-Mutualist (with Austrian economics) transition to our libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society

I am against Socialism without adjectives, Liberation Socialism , what Republicans falsely label as Socialism, and a few other forms of Socialism.  Pale lib

I am generally against bank bailouts. palelib

In this Democratic Socialist transition phase there would be no occupational licensing for jobs like dog walkers and barbers .Spending would be cut. These things should be done in a Democratic Socialist economy with free markets and minimal regulations that we transition to as we further transition to a State Socialist government (with Supply Side reform) who will then reverse course on this by allowing the state to step in  lib party candidate  doubles for. red green brown. ie a yang forward endorsed 

This echos my views on voluntary exchange. http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2013/12/n/.  bhl 

I am against the government's attempts to regulate business and trade theme .  pale lib?

This article reflects some of my thoughts on free markets in a static capitalistic society bhl

This should help transition us to an upgraded welfare state that is a fusion of universal welfare, Third Way SocDem workfarist policies like Working Families Tax Credit, National Childcare Strategy, National Minimum Wage, expanded America Works program (with GONGO added to America Works existing structure to make America Works be sort of pseudo Nationalized), TANF emergency funds and a more moderate to strong (i.e Nordic model type patcon) expansion of a welfare state (demcap)    not very pro welfary 

I am neutral lean support for a bill that would enhance hate crime data collection but only to be used as a rough spiritual outline and to provide community centered solutions to assist hate crimes victims and their communities etc.  paleolib

I am half heartily tolerant of decriminalizing brown sugar Heroin (for microscopic amounts way less than the smallest currently legal amount of Marijuana, if they are caught with any amount above that it is prison) where the penalty for the first few times for those small amounts is a huge fine and ‘optional’ drug education while the penalty for the 4th time caught and above for those microscopic amounts way less than the smallest currently legal amount of Marijuana is being sentenced to Attendance Centres (as in the UK) for 2 to 5 years as an alternative to prison along with allowing the extremely limited private cultivation of coca (Cocaine) to be legal in the US as in Bolivia.  I support legalizing Hydrocodone, and Oxycodone where they are legally sold just like Codeine is currently sold ie in small doses without a Px along with legalizing Naloxone.  Hard drug users should be released from prison more than somewhat sooner but sent after prison to social education (with teachers who are ‘tough’) and then rehabilitation camps that are fused with private or federal halfway houses. pro drug bent. pale lib

This article makes some good points on culture https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/06/toleration-cultures-international-issues-and-corporations/.  bhl

This article reflects some to many of my thoughts I have on race-ethnicity. Some of my other views on race-ethnicity match the views of BGJ’s views on race-ethnicity  https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/07/how-to-be-a-bleeding-heart-libertarian-about-race/. bhl

I am against wokeness and I am ecspecially against the most extreme wokeness (like Wikipedia's wokeness). Wokeness, escpecially the most extreme ie Wikipedia type of wokeness is divisive, irrational and far left. It is wrong on so many levels and backfires each time.  I anti woke. pale lib mises

I support the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act. pale lib

I tolerate an initiative to create 2nd amendment sanctuaries at the local and county level gun rights sanctuary areas . With gun issues being hot button and varied this is a compromise to allow some flexibility. pale lib

As great as the 1964 Civil Rights act was, it caused a slippery slope with workers who are drugees , workers who cause workplace discrimination and divisiveness (which prevents workers uniting to overthrow capitalism) , illegal migrants (who don’t meet any amnesty conditions), pedos , hetereo and gay couples who can’t get a room, the CRT in schools etc. It also might wrongly cause a Christian worker (not owner) who leaves work to avoid baking a cake for a gay couple’s wedding in danger of being arrested for ‘discrimination’

Moreover it lead to equity ‘quotas’, which go against the very nature of that act .We have to amend the 1964 Civil Rights act to either fix that or prevent slippery sloping that would go beyond those things into extreme left territory . pale lib ie mises caucus

I support the Stingray Law Enforcement Prohibition . Which means I support prohibiting the use of a cell site simulator device without a warrant ; I support amending RCW 9.73.260 and adding a new section to chapter 9.73 RCW   pale lib mises

I support Defend the Guard Act  pale lib mises

I support State Defunding of the NSA, including the 4th Amendment Protection Act, the , Electronic Data Privacy Act and the Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act. pale lib mises

I support tolerance https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2018/08/tolerance-as-a-public-good/  bhl

I am against women doing Prostitution , for Radical Feminist/Radical Lesbian Feminist reasons and because Prostitution is against the teachings Christ, it cheapens romance and is lust (one of the 7 deadly sins), but sex workers need to be treated like Christ treated the prostitute in the bible (and the ways above). Prostitution should not be legalized ever.The pimp should go to prison for it , while the buyer should not go to prison for it (sort of decriminalized) but instead go to a combination of technological incarceration and a sex version of a halfway house for light prostitution offenses but prison for non light prostitution offenses and (because I am a Libertarian) the sex worker (decriminalized)  should only have to pay a fine or community service along with vocation training/counseling for any type of prostitution offenses. I would give people A LOT of power to file civil lawsuits against sex workers for doing prostitution. Moreover, if the sex worker sets up a paid sex act as a pimp or a middle woman between the pimp and sex worker/client she should go to prison. I will say that when Nevada legalized Prostitution, all states should have followed suit at the same time, but that ship has long sailed for me. Sex workers should move to Nevada or Amsterdam if they want to legally do Prostitution and if private charities/NGOs want to pool money together to set up moving funds for women to move to places where Prostitution is legal to do sex work, so be it, I won’t complain about that at all, since I have bigger issues to deal with than being upset over women moving to places where Prostitution is legal to do sex work  We must protect all sex workers, including unique ones like Transgender sex workers from exploitative and high risk situations by putting economic and health resources into their hands so they don’t need to do such work but are protected if they continue to do so due clear up that nuclear mess. We need to share Christ with them ,telling  them to sin no more and do no more sex work. To find them find non sex work jobs (normal jobs) to help them grow as a person sympathetic to prostution mises paleo lib libertarian party though i go right of them. rad fem rad les fem due to paleolib according to polcompball giving a voice to them + red green brown thing/tom m womans power thing w a twist rad fems

Personally and legality wise, I conditionally support gay marriage (based on this line of thinking, as a way to eventually usher in Unorganized Marriage):   https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/01/a-challenge-for-libertarians-against-federal-recognition-of-same-sex-marriage/   bhl

I am fine with the Mises Caucus’s stance on lockdowns

migration

If deportation of illegal immigrants was either was like when a nice crossing guard escorted a child home rather than how it is now and where most deported illegals moved back to the US legally after being deported  OR where illegal immigrants could be population-aly resettled to their previous country by the US in a way that complies with this UN exception for population resettlement, I would be ok with those deportations/population resettlements.  radgeek bhl left lib about how radgeek would be fine w deportation

The rest of my migration views mesh with Anarcho Capitalist-Libertarian ideology