Far Right Green Red Brown Alliance

 I support a Red-green-brown alliance between Center Left-Leftish Grifters (like Joe Rogan, Tulsi Gabbard, BJG, Glenn Greenwald, Bill Maher etc), Boll weevil Democrats, Social Democrats USA , Muslim House Caucus (Democrats), Forward (US) Party and the House Freedom Caucus-AmericaFirst Republicans   liberal socialism is used by some grifters including faux grifter vaush

https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

I am a Social Democrat. I support the Labour Party UK (Blue Labour/New Labour/Third Way/Third Way Social Democracy

I support my economic ideolgies above mixed with the economic views below to form a robust mixed economy (that is a slightly more left wing of what is otherwise indistinguishable from Social Liberalism or Social Democracy) where my economic ideologies above would be given the majority of the weight i.e for necessities but where the economic views below would be used more as social safety nets than my economic ideologies’ aboves’ social safety nets and for luxuries:  liberal socialism  liberal mixed economy red grown brown allianceish

I am ok with to tolerant of Lee Atwater's fiscal-welfare views but ONLY when they are fused with Humanistic Capitalism(A Yang Forward)/B Sanderism (T Gabbard, BGJ/Jimmy Dore/Joe Rogan), Free Market Yellow Socialism and Welfare Chauvinism, otherwise I am against his fiscal-welfare views

I am Anti Crony Capitalism , Anti Social Liberal Capitalism, Anti Keynesian Capitalism  (except when it was used early in Barack Obama’s tenure as noted above),. I am strongly non supportive of most to the vast majority of other forms of Capitalism . Capitalism is bad in part because it is so modern

I tolerate Universal Basic Income ONLY if it would replace (or heavily limit) welfare and similar big gov bureaucratic programs. It also should streamline assistance to needy people without needing to check eligibility and makes it easier for unemployed people and even people on welfare to find work since having more money allows flexibility in finding the right job .But it is too generous and supported by too many people for me to officially support   Joe Rogan  A Yang

I support free trade and free enterprise (ie commerce).   Boll Weevil Dem 

I support raising the raising of the budget ceiling and debt limit Boll Weevil Dem

I support Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts BWD

I condone autarchy of the great spaces

I support Ronald Reagan’s military spending   BWD

I support FDR’s New Deal (I am on SSI for years, thanks New Deal) since it was mixed-syncretic but I really support the Fair Deal which was an upgrade over the New Deal. BWD

I support the Dodd Frank Act but I support increased congressional scrutiny of the Federal Reserve (including auditing it) and easing of some regulatory laws on multiple small banks and loosening oversight to banks likr SunTrust Banks which was enacted under the Dodd Frank Act BWD

More often than not, bank bailouts showed the banks rule over the government while the government rules over us. Banks used the bailouts to enrich themselves and their corrupt shareholders. The banks should be seized and turned over to worker committees and community reps that serve the public.  Party for liberation and socialism via  red brown multipolar alliance mentioned by Alex Reid Ross

I am against moratorium on earmark funding BWD

If the state is eliminated we would have true spontaneous order. I do believe we have some forms of economic spontaneous order which is evident by my fiscal viesws

Liberal Socialism is grifterish

I want to use either Democratic Socialism with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning with some form of market socialism (some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning) OR Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy to lead to us an eventual State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China)

OR

I want to use Left-Wing Laissez Fairie (Left Libertarianism, Anarcho Individualism, freed markets, Austrian economics) to lead to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist society 

Path to a State Socialist (i.e State Socialism) society with Supply Side reform (like in China) 

The Democratic Socialist transition path 

The Democratic Socialist transition path to a State Socialist society would have Democratic Socialism but with free markets, minimal regulations and very few if any planning and or with some form of market socialism, some of which would be based on self-management and or non-market participatory economy based on decentralized economic planning

In this phase there would seriously be less government regulation of business and trade. There would be deregulation to increase economic growth and to cut back unneeded funding

In this Democratic Socialist transition phase there would be no occupational licensing for jobs like dog walkers and barbers .Spending would be cut. These things should be done in a Democratic Socialist economy with free markets and minimal regulations that we transition to as we further transition to a State Socialist government (with Supply Side reform) who will then reverse course on this by allowing the state to step in

The Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path   

In this Liberal Democracy with a Market Socialist economy transition path, workers would have widespread self management within the framework of a Liberal Democratic market economy. They would vote to elect their managers and even directly own their workplace . 

Early on, in this Liberal Democracy with Market Socialist economy, limits would be placed on the government to protect it from degenerating into an autocracy or aristocracy. Direct Democracy would be established within the workplace and within the government. The transitional government would then exist as an institution to protect the rights of the individual from predatory corporations, authoritarian leaders, and corruption. All of this would be to make the transition to a State Socialist government more smooth and natural

Corporate donations (including donations from worker-managed collectives) would be banned. There would also be limits placed on the amount of money that private individuals could contribute to their electoral candidates. Competition between self managed corporations would be encouraged in order to prevent technological stagnation.

Eventually as we transition further to a State Socialist economy, there would be use of a local government to further social and public ownership of utilities before the state steps in truly socializing the Means of Production but in a all hands on deck (Third Way SocDem) sort of way that ideally makes everyone at least somewhat happy (public ownership is rightfully or wrongfully seen by a significant amount of people to be inefficient or undesirable). Thus this would lead to lead to a liberalization of a centralized State Socialist government  liberal socialism like fake grifter vaush

I am really ok with Ronald Reagan’s deregulations as President BWD

I am against Neoliberalism

If the state is eliminated we would have true spontaneous order. I do believe we have some forms of economic spontaneous order which is evident by my fiscal viesws.  ps&l ?rgb multipolar 

I am open to tolerating Dasein  red brown multipolar 4pt

I am anti statist

I support making sure social institutions are working sufficiently to the benefit all people. We should focus on the interests on the poor ,marginalized and down and out

It is hard and complicated to find true healthcare solutions. We need to dig deep to examines policies and offer impactful solutions. Health is a human right, while we also need more of a nuanced and individualistic mindset that sets the US apart from Western Europe.

I am ok with the Australia inspired public option model but with a twist. If you are one of those people (like a worker, and or young and or healthy etc) who doesn’t need expensive private insurance you can receive quality , health care (via a free trial model) using a healthcare version of the bad bank model and a semi private charity model fused with a peer to peer model, the latter has Americans helping Americans who can’t afford healthcare get healthcare via private donations from Americans to other Americans to be able to get healthcare (Americans would be incentivized to do so) but in a peer to peer way.

However, if you like your private insurance, you’re financially secure, you have specific needs that aren’t covered by the plan above, or you simply don’t trust the healthcare plan above, , then you have every right to keep your private insurance. 

This plan would disassociate health from employment which is good because healthcare should not be a factor in picking the right job, (my dad was forced to keep his job to get us quality healthcare and that should not be the case for workers), and incentivize regulators to negotiate transparent and affordable drug and treatment prices, prioritizing people over big Pharma. I believe the “Medicare for All Who Want It with a twist” model reflects where Americans are and if our country does a better job delivering healthcare than the private providers deliver, we could ultimately shift to the single payer system that Donald Trump favors  Forward party Wendy Hamilton

However, bargained reductions of the work week and the concomitant increase of new workers to share their work is something we need to encourage along with flexible changes (sabbaticals, leaves, training etc) for all heteronomous type of job (within reason). This means less work for better work and more time for better life. Norilsk Russia has a good way of giving workers vacation comps that could be a model for us    4pt via New Right

We must gradually dissociate work from income due to increased buying power and allure of goods.

I agree with what Vaush said here  “When (Karl) Marx and following theorists wrote on capitalism they weren't writing 'capitalism and liberalism are worst things to ever happen to humanity, they are the greatest oppression of workers'. No. Marxism is supposed to be an extension of liberalism not a rejection of it, a true promotion of unity, fraternity, and freedom, and liberty, and shit. That's what Marxism and that's what leftism is about, it's about bringing the messaging of the liberal movement forward, to make it better, to make it get stronger, to make it true to its principles.”  liberal socialism

Rudolf Rocker echoes my views on the relation between Anarchism and Liberal Socialism : “Modern anarchism is the confluence of the two great currents which during and since the French revolution have found such characteristic expression in the intellectual life of Europe: Socialism and Liberalism. The classical liberal ideals were wrecked on the realities of capitalist economic forms. Anarchism is necessarily anti-p capitalist in that it opposes the exploitation of man by man. But anarchism also opposes the dominion of man over man. It insists that socialism will be free or it will not be at all. In its recognition of this lies the genuine and profound justification for the existence of anarchism. From this point of view, anarchism may be regarded as the libertarian wing of socialism. It is in this spirit that Daniel Guérin has approached the study of anarchism in Anarchism and other works.” This is also touched upon by Noam Chomsky here   liberal socialism 

I support the ForcetheVote since we were in a health crisis and needed better access to healthcare. I would support Medicare for All in the future but only in a non capitalist economy (and non State Socialist economy) or in a capitalist economy if there is another health crisis  BGJ Jimmy Dore

Under Capitalism ESPECIALLY Neoliberalism, crony Capitalism Social Liberal Capitalism and Keynesian Capitalism  (except when it was used early in Barack Obama’s tenure as noted above), private property is under attack due to the homeless epidemic it creates with millions of people losing their homes through the foreclosures that it creates. Cuba doesn’t have a homelessness problem due to them having in some ways, less bad fiscal policies than the US along with their unique private property model (where they have a mirage of having no private property when they do in fact have private property but in a way that Mark Twain would accept)

RE

I support the right of self determination for these groups of the US: blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics-Latinos, Hawaiians, Asians, Arabs and Pacific Islanders  pfl&s via multipolar red brown green

My views on wokeness match Bari Weiss, Bill Maher, Joe Rogan, James Carville, Charlie Kirk (non extreme) and Tucker Carlson's (less harsh) views on wokeness

This article https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/07/how-to-be-a-bleeding-heart-libertarian-about-race/  generally reflects some to many of my thoughts I have on race-ethnicity. Some of my other views on race-ethnicity match the views of BGJ’s views on race-ethnicity

This site is a great start for whether blacks should receive repatriations. I am open hearted lean more than tolerant of having the government give blacks repartitions if the concerns in the link I provided were made assuming they use Dark Mutualism (far right mutalism) to do so    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/black-reparations/   Tulsi

I am not an antiracist, I am a non racist. It is believed that racism is a liberal Eurocentric and imperialist ideology. Naturally racism is wrong and evil   4pt and new right  multipolar red brown green 

I am glad that the PSL exploited the deaths of minorities to further their agenda which is really about abolishing Capitalism and our hierarchal society (which are good goals). At least the PSL isn’t woke pl&s via rgb multipolar

I feel about the far left of the fringe (not the whole fringe) of BLM the same way that David Clarke feels about BLM as a whole  BWD

White people who are racist need to be privately confronted for their bigotry and if they don't change, they should be banished or isolated forcing them to not be racist and change (sorry I don't make those rules, nature makes them and nature does not tolerate racism). 

One creative idea to make those white racists become non racist against BIPOC+ would be to reprogram white racists to become woke and to embrace the CRT. This way those white racists can shift their hate target from BIPOC+ to whites or white racists (or at least shift their target from BIPOC+ to woke antiracist liberal WHITES) and employ left wing, CRT anti white  'racism' (ie "BIPOC are equal to Whites but BIPOC+ are more equal than Whites", "whitey is bad whitey is bad") and antiracist tactics toward acceptable target (white racists, maybe whites) while holding on to their other views.   in spirit of theme

Of course in the above hypothetical world, I would be the sort of ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalism based on the Scottish model (4pt rgb multipolar) who blurs the line of being a ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalism based on the Scottish model and something that is between an Alex Nalvhany Nationalist/Tucker Carlson Nationalist and a National Anarchist

LGBTQ

I generally support gay rights, but not at the expense of other peoples rights  Joe Rogan

Personally and Legality wise I am against gay marriages that infringe on other people’s rights  Joe Rogan

Personally and Legality wise, I support gay marriages that don’t infringe on other people’s rights Joe Rogan

I support the repeal of DADT for Libertarian reasons  Tulsi

I believe there was middle ground in the Kentucky marriage license fiasco from years back . I do not condemn Kim Davis. She did what she thought was right  BWD

I support adding a Queer Theory (ideally a Radically Centrist variety) and Gay shame movement (non regressive/center left variety) sub caucus to the Congressional LGBTQ Equality Caucus so I could symbolically support that caucus  Tulsi supports said caucus

Discrimination of LGBGT people not only negatively effects LGBTQ but is bad to working class people of all stripes as any discrimination practices between demographic sections of the working class cause a very divisive practice hurting the development of working class consciousness , creating barriers to class unity to take away attention from class exploitation which bolsters the rich 

So by fighting against LGBTQ discrimination, it can help all workers of all sexual orientations since without the distractions of a ti LGBTQ bigotry, their attention would then shift to the evils of the rich corporate crony capitalists which would lead to the overthrow of those rich corporate crony capitalists, leading to the betterment of ALL people, not just LGBTQ in all aspects. So yeah, selfish motive (help LGBTQ) by doing something that appears woke (fighting against LGBTQ discrimination), might not be that bad of an idea.   To do this, we need to protect LGBTQ people from and possibly kick the sh#t out of any homophobic or transphobic co workers who harass or endanger our LGBTQ co workers like how Roger Goodell use to protect his gay brother as youngster even beating up homophobes who harassed his brother. LGBTQ saviorism is fun. The equality act is too much big gov, we shouldn’t have to rely on the gov to play peacekeeper with such laws they need to focus on relevant things. We the people can do it just fine on our own

I support protecting the dignity and security of elderly LGBTQ people through Christianity to help bridge the gap for them between Earth and the afterlife, along with easier access for STD care, Mushroom semi legalization for LGBTQ elderly people and the creation and expansion of LGBTQ retirement communities (like Andrew Cuomo would want to create and expand) . I also support predistrubition for elderly LGBTQ people. Elderly LGBTQ are a unique asset to our communities  Forward Wendy Hamilton

I want the FMA passed but updated and changed to state: 

Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of human heterosexual couples and human same sex couples (as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others) from Earth and intelligent life extraterrestrial heterosexual couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes. This constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups of intelligent life extraterrestrial same sex couples from other solar systems , galaxies and universes. The first sentence would provide an official definition of legal marriage in the United States. This would be designed to restrict the right of marriage to human heterosexual couples, human same sex couples (as long as they don’t infringe on the rights of others) from Earth and intelligent life extraterrestrial heterosexual couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes and to deny that right to intelligent life extraterrestrial same sex couples from other solar systems, galaxies and universes. BWD

I take a Boll Weevil Democrat stance on gays using surrogacy to adopt children. BWD

I don’t believe Ron Desantis should control what kids learn or don’t learn in school. He is a governor not a  school board president and he should not have passed his authoritarian law. However, even though it should have happened via school board meetings involving parents not via an authoritarian law by Ron Desantis, I am fine with the result: kids in Florida schools not being what some far right people call ‘groomed’ and not having a sensitive topic like LGBTQ topics shoved down their throats irresponsibly. Students should learn about the basics like the 3 Rs, history (which maybe could include brief mentions of LGBTQ), not about complex subjects like that. . I can pretend to live with students in high school sex ed and elective LGBTQ studies learning about LGBTQ topics (in a neutral way), but anything more and or earlier is a too much. Kids should be kids, not experts on sex and gender topics. Anyone who disagrees would have to convince me whether they would have wanted to learn about LGBT Q topics in school when they were in their youth Tulsi

More than 48 percent  of DC LGBTQ+ youth have seriously considered suicide over the past year and percentages across the country aren’t far off. We have to help LGBTQ not even consider suicide since Republicans wrongly take the blame for said suicides. To do this, we need to use our God given minds and hearts along with an all hands on deck approach to do so.  Forward Wendy Hamilton

We must protect all sex workers, including unique ones like Transgender sex workers from exploitative and high risk situations by putting economic and health resources into their hands so they don’t need to do such work but are protected if they continue to do so due clear up that nuclear mess. We need to share Christ with them ,telling  them to sin no more and do no more sex work. To find them find non sex work jobs (normal jobs) to help them grow as a person. Wendy Hamilton Forward

Radical Lesbian Feminists (3P Tom M Woman’s Power but with me adding Radical Fems to it instead and 3p instead of rgb, and Paleolib sympathy latter according to polcompball)

I am against women doing Prostitution , for Radical Feminist/Radical Lesbian Feminist reasons

I am very much against Pornography and I want Pornography to be illegal . Pornography cheapens love,is disgusting, immoral, exploitative and is wrong. We should spread the Feminists anti pornography views. They rightfully recognize the horrors of how pornography is harmful to women and leads to increased violence against women. Feminists knows the appalling tendency of pornography to use coercion on women (physical, psychological, economical etc) to do Pornography, even if women are seen to be having a good time (which they aren’t because pornography objectifies women). Feminists know women aren’t there by choice, that ‘happiness’ is not natural but coerced and artificial and like feminists, that bothers me. We need to get the word out that Pornography is wrong and must be abolished because it is patriarchal propaganda.  Radical Feminists/Radical Lesbiam Feminists  via rgb 3p tom m Woman’s Power,polcompball said  paleolib give voice to their view 

 I take a Boll weevil Democrat stance on the whole pronoun issue  rpl boll weevil on trans rights BWD

Even though I am as pro life as I am, I seriously downplay the the abortion issue. We need to put divisive issues like abortion aside and focus on moving ahead together. We need to drop the whole left right chasm or pro life pro choice divide and be pro forward   foreard and yang 2022 cnn 

Legality wise, I am “pro choice” as well as “anti abortion” (Forward endorsed libertarian party candidate from ny) for first trimester abortions. I respect the privacy of the mothers to make the decision that is best for them (A Yang Forward)

In that hypothetical world, I'd personally and legality wise be Pro Choice (ie support the woman’s right to choose) for the first two trimesters (in every possible circumstance) (A Yang Forward) and Pro life for the third trimester (alt apolitical on abortions in that hypothetical world for babies who are conceived via rape or incest). 

But there are a lot of feminist things (basically things from feminist movements that were hijacked by Woke Communists) that I am against  (like that Lego complaint years ago by feminists, or the prominence of male rapists since I believe feminists talking about that as a woman’s issue and saying rape is mostly done by men seriously downplays or even negates male sexual assault victims or feminists saying that that video game designer from Puerto Rico was misogynist or should be fired for his gamer gate comments, or feminist complaints that Jurassic World was a sexist movie, or downplaying Valerie Solanas's extremism, or complaints about how women are portrayed in most video games, or feminist complaints about urinals, those type of feminist views like that and some other views I loathe and strongly disagree with).   reddit alt righter and liberal socialism complain some feminist movements hijacked by communists

I support Men’s Liberation and I am generally a Feminist ally (especially in combating Toxic Masculinity). I am Anti Sexist I generally believe that Male Patriarchy/Patriarchy is at least somewhat culturally pervasive and it has a negative effect on everyone, and negatively effects women more than men. Gender stereotypes harm BOTH men and women.We need more civil liberties and gender equality. The patriarchy is still unfortunately a factor and has claimed many victims (mostly women). Gender roles suck The patriarchy might (big might) be enforced by women too (at least slightly see below) so the concept of a male patriarchy/patriarchy is not as simple as a oppressor-oppressed dynamic. Patriarchy misses the point that there is equal vulnerability of average men and that our Patriarchal system excludes men who don’t conform to traditional gender roles.  As much as I loathe intersectionality, it has its uses in this area. Complicating the patriarchy idea is that Transgender men and gay men are more likely to defy the gendered patriarchal expectations which sadly harm them for daring to be different in this boring vanilla world, which gives them unique outlooks on this. Anyway, ‘manliness’ shouldn’t be defined by the traditional archaic perceptions of that term . Men should be able to act how they want whether traditionally masculine or other ways that aren’t traditionally masculine (like femboys) That does not mean men can’t still be proud of their masculinity despite defying gender role norms . I hate society telling people how they are supposed to act, whether its gender roles, what type of clothes to wear (why can’t I wear unmatching clothes or white after Labor Day?), and similar things. Men can also lift to better themselves instead of for the sexist degrading reason of impressing women (which is so archaic) Patriarchy/Male Patriarchy is sadly a real and infests our culture and institutions. We have to stop women from being oppressed. we must counter and defeat sexism. Men also have issues because of this evil patriarchal system and intersectionality along with other feminist concepts are needed to combat this Feminism should be inclusive to everyone like body positive, body negative feminist movements are like so. I disagree with feminism on dating and relationship struggles. Contrary to what feminists claim, those issues are not due to not respecting boundaries or lack of self confidence. Those issues are because dating involves a lot of work for men including men having to make guesses on when to make their move. This can be tiring and not really fair to men. Also feminists don’t realize that men are offended and hurt by the fact that many women are shallow when choosing a man, using arbitrary and shallow things like fashion, career status, social status, body fitness, wealth. Moreover feminists don’t realize how sad and archaic it is for some women to choose traditionally masculine men. Women are unfortunately not willing to let men have their emotional guard down and feminists insensitively claim men should stay away from such women while also countering this view by men in addition to saying no one is ‘entitled’ to a relationship. It is true that men can’t/SHOULD NOT force someone to love another person, but the feminists mentioned above are not helpful in this at all, and they underscore how it is perfectly normal to want a relationship over involuntary relationship loneliness which our society should try to prevent. They are however correct that forcing someone into a relationship is wrong  We need to expose the patriarchal injustices in society and fix them . Both men and women should be free  vaush liberal socialism

Guns

I support allowing teachers to carry smart guns voluntarily in case of school shootings even though shootings are extremely rare  l shape forward, smart gun my addition since a yang forward supports smart guns

I would not be triggered, upset, depressed or offended if the US brings back its 1994-2004 assault weapons ban which would also keep existing assault weapons in circulation but ban the sales of new ones because we would be going back to something we are used to, but I don’t support such a ban either. Assault weapon bans are mixed to ineffective. Most gun deaths are done with handguns, not assault rifles. Forward A Yang

Instead I believe we should lower the amount of guns (all types) in the US to a level where we know will significantly reduce gun violence (even if it doesn’t). The US has more guns than any other country on Earth. This does not mean via fascists coming for our guns, it just means EITHER having gun companies create a little less guns and assault weapons than they do now, and having semi private NGOs incentive people to throw away their guns  OR implement a common sense licensing policy for guns which also allows people who don’t get their gun licenses or who are deterred from getting a gun after waiting a long time for a gun license, to instead be given free stun gun-taser(s), free airsoft guns, free mace-pepper sprays and a free state of the art alarm system but if and when they get their gun license they have to return that stuff .   I support closing the Charleston loophole   Forward party

I support expanded red flag laws over Universal background checks

I support smart guns to prevent innocent people from firing them (like kids) and using incentives for gun owners to get smart guns A Yang Forward 

I don’t think it is unreasonable for gun companies to pay a small fine when their product is used in mass shootings in order to realign incentives to deal with the issue of gun manufacturers' stocks profiting from mass shootings with their guns (though the MSM helps glorify mass shootings too so this would need to be done in conjunction with limiting the MMM’s exploitation of mass shootings A Yang Forward

Youth

I support some slight decentralization of education. I am ok with opt outs on testing and reimagining the Boards of Regents. Isupport expanded work based learning systems for high school students so they are prepared for life after high school/college/grad school and since it adds more work for them in school sort of making up for them being deprived of working more hours in school. I am also open to a K-10 model reducing the span of school to get young people ready to work.  forward party larry shape 

We need nuanced ideas to help teachers do their jobs without worrying about the left firing them for not towing the line. To do this, we must focus on restorative justice and building community relations.We must help students thrive in school. To do so we must increase funding for vocational training, socio emotional learning. This would include, trauma support, change adjustment, loss, economic vulnerability and similar hinderances to their success. To address holes in our graduation rates where they exist, we need to find and apply new pathways to keep students and young people engaged while as mentioned above preparing them for the future. We must use philosophy over money to achieve this. New ideas to do these things is a must. There is a value in school choice. We need a nuanced approach along with promoting collaboration between charter (private) and public schools, so different school systems can learn about what is working and implement some of those alternative models that are attracting and catering to various types of students in our communities. School choice should not be viewed as a financial thing but instead promote public schools collaborating with award winning charter (private) schools on their school models that resonate with young people which bridges gaps, inspires and lights a fire under modern day students.Private (charter) schools are good too because they can meet unique student needs in a relevant way including resource classes, electives and gamified learning etc etc.So I support school choice and am fine with charter/private schools (since I wanted it when I moved to my new town 1997 but couldn't get a voucher).  Forward Wendy Hamilton

We need to fix our mental heath crises in this country. Mental health has to be taken more seriously by the voters, government and UN. Joe Biden should be commended for moving us in that direction

IPIP

In order to build a revolution to overcome our society’s Capitalism , we need to build a working class  . But we can only build this revolutionary party by engaging in all relevant issues affecting the working class, which I lay out in these sections of my blog : labor (fiscal), International (anti war), Ethnic-Racial issues, Sex gender issues, LGBTQ issues, etc Pl&s multipolar rgb

I am against Left Wing Identity politics and Intersectionality. Even if we pretend Non white identity politics helps BIPOC, they are a false mirage and delusion for those marginalized groups and creates a bond owner mentality in going way too far in opposing anything even resembling a white identity among idenitarian platforms

I satirically support American Patriotism  vaushism liberal socialism 

I support Pro Western Leftism  vaushism liberal socialism, also sounds right but is left

I am a Bill Maher type of Western values traditionalist  fix red brown green   Bill Maher

I support Liberal Socialist Equality as an extension of Egalitarianism libsoc as a safety net for marginalized people in case the above Marxist ‘equality by enabling individuals to pursue their desires and interests and preventing exploitation on materialist grounds and economical logistics’ methods don’t work to bring them equality and protection like when those marginalized people remain unequal or exploited on materialist grounds and economical logistics. 

I believe that equality (ideally Marxist egalitarianism or regular egalitarianism if that is not viable) justice (Marxist egalitarianism or regular egalitarianism if that is not viable) and solidarity (intuitive, non woke) should be added as human rights. This would be better than not doing so and using Liberal Socialist Equality as a safety net and a bandaid  libsoc 

I don’t care for egalitarianism in the greater equality between classes sense since it is abstract and bourgeois. Classlessness (and hierarchylessness) is not the subordination of our society to universal interests like the universal notion of equality. It is about creating conditions which enables individuals to pursue their desires and interests .We need more concrete principles like opposition to exploitation on materialist grounds and economical logistics.  K Marx Marxist egal

I am ok with what some people would call ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalism based on the Scottish model.We need traditional sacred and religious-spiritual empires which are based on traditional civic societies to battle against globalization, universalism,  the bourgeois nation state and transnational progressiveness.  For that Multipolar Ethnocentric Socialism can be a legit weapon in the fight against Imperialism. Which is ehy I support the Scottish and Welsh Independence movements.  4pt new right

I am a fan of the IDW and endorse most of their views rgb Sam Harris

Crime

I support Justice Action (Australia). They help prisoners who are often victims of punitive and harsh punishments and I applaud the work they do in helping them  multipolar rgb Tim Anderson

The Denver PSL organizers should not have been arrested as they did nothing wrong in their 2020 protests . The PSL have always been anti police long before BLM existed, so its to be expected the PSL would protest against police, its not like it was a non anti police group protesting police violence in which case I would back off. multipolar rgb ps&l

I condemn people disrespecting the police (like throwing things at them, spitting on them, harassing them, calling for violence against them). I echo some of David Clarke’s pro police views. David Clarke BWD

The police should not be defunded or abolished. We need to build more positive relations with therapists, social workers, Religious leaders/Chaplains and similar agencies in our communities to help tag along with police and maybe be guest police at times for specific non violent crimes freeing police officers to focus on areas of our communities where they are needed.We also need to get police to deescalate instead of escalate dangerous encounters with perps. Forward Wendy Hamilton

If the police are abolished we'll have vigilantism which would be a positive side effect of that so maybe the police being abolished wouldn't be that bad if it lead to vigilantism (like in the Death Wish movies but ONLY if vigilantes comply with this former police officer's guidelines for police officers http://normstamper.com/about Another good thing is if we abolish the police we can make gun ownership a human right and everyone can stock up on guns and get easier access to guns. But in that world , 1870s-1960s NRA like training , voluntary gun self control (instead of the 1870s-1960s NRA’s gun control) and similar measures would need to be implemented to make that practical along with a new criminal justice system based on the democratic organization of the working class and its right to defend its class interests on the basis of solidarity and unity. ps&l multipolar rgb

I am half heartily tolerant of decriminalizing brown sugar Heroin (for microscopic amounts way less than the smallest currently legal amount of Marijuana, if they are caught with any amount above that it is prison) where the penalty for the first few times for those small amounts is a huge fine and ‘optional’ drug education while the penalty for the 4th time caught and above for those microscopic amounts way less than the smallest currently legal amount of Marijuana is being sentenced to Attendance Centres (as in the UK) for 2 to 5 years as an alternative to prison A Yang Forward along with allowing the extremely limited private cultivation of coca (Cocaine) to be legal in the US as in Bolivia. 

I am between somewhat support and symbolic support for legalizing hemp  Forward larry sharpe

I support legalizing Hydrocodone, and Oxycodone where they are legally sold just like Codeine is currently sold ie in small doses without a Px along with legalizing Naloxone

Hard drug users should be released from prison more than somewhat sooner but sent after prison to social education (with teachers who are ‘tough’) and then rehabilitation camps that are fused with private or federal halfway houses.  ps&l multipolar rgb. sort of

Migration

If I sound too harsh on migration and illegal migration, its only because since I am generally against Capitalism (ESPECIALLY especially Neoliberalism, Social Liberal Capitalism, crony Capitalism and Keynesian Capitalism) I realize that mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration is beneficial to the capitalist class and thus that makes mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration bad in my eyes. Because migration happens within a capitalist country like the US, migration is sadly a modern day version of bondage (like in the Old South)  Back then, there was colonialist exploitation happening within a capitalist country via bondage due to similar conditions to today. Today via mass migration, illegal migration and progressive migration, migrants and illegals sadly end up working below minimum wage or barely minimum wage in a subsistence type existence (like fuel construction work of migrants in the US for example) within a capitalist country not too much better or different than the type of dehumanizing capitalist worker exploitation that slaves were put through in the Old South. When we defeat Capitalism and usher in a more socialistic country that meshes with my economic views, I will become very pro migrant and even pro illegal migrant (ie I will then become as progressive on migration and illegal migration as a Rage Against the Machine idealized Paul Ryan would be on migration and illegal migration)  leninism , meshes with PSL red green brown multipolar theme also sounds right wing but really left wing

All illegal migrants in the US who are eligible should be put in a program in this Forward Party system below:A system with a new tier or holocracy of longterm permanent residency that would allow immigrants who are in the US illegally to legally attain citizenship in 18 years. If they register for the new tier or holocracy , illegal immigrants who have lived illegally in the country for a substantial amount of time would be able to work and live in US, while they wait to become citizens, as long as they pay taxes and don’t receive any felony convictions.forward

If deportation of illegal immigrants was either was like when a nice crossing guard escorted a child home rather than how it is now and where most deported illegals moved back to the US legally after being deported  OR where illegal immigrants could be population-aly resettled to their previous country by the US in a way that complies with this UN exception for population resettlement, I would be ok with those deportations/population resettlements  un rgb occassional ally

This is how I would Fix migration until we move beyond Capitalism: I would have the US set up a system of temporary citizen exchanges (trading Americans for citizens in other countries). Maybe millions of such temporary exchanges a year between the US (with preferences for temporary exchanges between the US and Mexico and Central American countries).  If the temporary migrants in the US assimilate or are bicultural, are not convicted of crimes, terrorism or treason, don’t create chain migration, are ideally patriotic , show minimal knowledge of US history, government and the English language, have a steady job, are in college or the military, they can become permanent citizens of the US if they pay a one time exchange to permanent citizen tax and renounce their citizenship of their previous country to make their permanent residency official from parallelfar left blog

I would want more funding for the US ports of entry, fixing tech on our borders and updating our eco and environmental protections in areas like the Rio Grande.  Forward ?

I am against xenophobia as history has shown Xenophobia is an artificial, bourgeois and modern construct  possibly 4pt

Neocon warmonger John Bolton is the enemy of our planet as his imperialism and unapologetic crusades have left destruction in countries at every turn. Liberals love slurping up any Cold War propaganda if they can use it against Donald Trump or his close allies  multipolar max b rgb 

Intn

I am an Anti Imperialist

I am fine with Left Neoconservatism in rare instances vaush liberal socialism also sounds right but left

I am warming up to trying to be open hearted to tolerating a multipolar world which would be a confederation of traditionalist regional empires united under Russian soveignerity that will defeat postmodern demographies. I feel these fellow multipolar countries would keep Russia in line and prevent Russian aggression better than NATO does   multipolar 4pt rgb

The Israelis are relative good guys a lot to somewhat more than most of the time (ymmv), and I am glad Israel exists (I am a non Zionist)

But when I see them stoop lower than the Palestinians (not that the Palestinians are lowly, both sides got a legit greivance its just Israel's greviance is better than the Palestians' greviance) to combat the Palestinians aggression, I mentally go off script

Israel has committed countless harsh human rights violations against the Palestinians for decades using the cover of being ‘America of the Middle East’ .

This allowed Israel to avoid blowback and scrutiny for their abuse that other Middle Eastern countries could never be afforded. They have dehumanized the Palestinians on occasion while treating them like terrorists which is Islamaphobic.  When both political parties in the US are so Pro Israel and won’t even show any sympathy for the Palestinians you know it is a serious issue

These atrocities have caused pain and suffering on both sides

I get unwanted thoughts and emotions that gives me an uneasy and unshakable feeling that what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians might be similar to what China and the CCP are doing to the Uyghurs in China over the last decade or so. I know that's not true but if I see that, others do.

The Israelis and Israeli government are very wrong for doing such things to the Palestinians (its because Israel should be held to a higher standard). Some commentators have labeled Israeli's actions against the Palestinians using harsher terms than I described them as above. Those harsher comparisons were made years ago by one of Israel's military leaders along with others through the years like Yehuda Elkana, Noam Chomsky and Albert Einstein, Amos Oz and Max Blumenthal. I don't condemn those commentators for using harsher words to describe Israel's actions than I use since they are humans and call things as they see them. But I won't use those words since I basically don't see Israel's actions as that extreme. 

If Israel keeps stooping lower than the Palestinians level and keeps up their abuse and human rights violations against the Palestinians, I might end up becoming more sympathetic to the Palestinians

However, I'll always be pro Israel even if Israel goes harder on the Palestinians. At worst , while I am still being Pro Israel, I would unconciously be hoping that G-d corrects Israel for their negative actions against the Palestinians literally the same exact methods he used to correct the Jews while they were roaming in the wilderness for 40 years in Exodus.  Israel needs to show they are the bigger person. 

I try to view China like the PSL and Fourth International Theory do but… Whether China did genocide to Uyghurs or not is moot (but it was a genocide by most definitions), China still committed inhumane human rights violations against the Uyghurs and thus they are very wrong to treat the Uyghurs the way they did (at best and to say the very least). I try to see their acts through PSL’s lense but its hard not see evil in what China did

China should get all of the Uyghurs to self deport back to their countries and pay them repartitions for the abuse they have done to them. Then China should allow the Uyghurs who don't self deport to be freed and given freedom but be forced to enroll in the Chinese version of the US Dignity Proposal program. If China can't help themselves become a free country, then at worst, they should then non intrusively track the Uyghurs via a Left Wing version of the same spying methods that Barack Obama/NSA used to spy on US citizens 

If China used the spyingish methods on the Uyghurs that the StaSI used in East Germany on private citizens (while allowing the Uyghurs to be 100 percent free), I would look still criticize China but without the anger or passion

I believe sanctioning China for the Uyghur situation or any reason is wrong and petty as sanctions don't work most of the time. China should not be sanctioned ever unless its indefensible not to hit them with said sanctions. 

China needs to be pushed to be conservative instead of being trashed so they can become a conservative ally to the US. I blindly trust they will continue to get better as a country like they always have (they are helping or something similar to helping Russia after all and are becoming less liberal on population control). 

I do personally somewhat despise China for hating Donald Trump and Trump supporters and it will take a lot of moving right from China to offset that (though based on a 2000 talk with my youth group member, I will never really support China or give them any grade as a country better than a letter grade between S and B that has 4 minuses in it with a secondary grade of a letter grade between D and C with 2 pluses in it)  China will be one of the countries that is evil in the last days before Christ comes after all

China should free their forced laborers and pay those laborers and all laborers doing those types of jobs using the Truck wages system-company store system that is mixed with a few payment methods from the counter economic system.

 ps&l rgb multipolar but harsher by alot

I support the Anti Globalization Movement of RU (I am Anti Globalization)

I see the Russia-Ukraine conflict sort of like a Russian spring

Personally here are my views on the Russia-Ukraine conflict : 

Crimea belongs to Russia not Ukraine and it should be recognized officially as such  . If the Crimeans rise up and outst Russians from their region and declare their loyalty to Ukraine, I will change my opinion on this.

I support Russia going into the People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk and claiming it. The people in that province were being persecuted by Ukraine and Russia rightfully came to their aide.

I conditionally support the People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk seceding from Russia and once again becoming part of Ukraine but only under these conditions:

Condition 1) The People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk become an Autonomous Republic of Ukraine instead of going back to being an oblast of Ukraine (like Crimea is or was to Ukraine). 

Condition 2) South Ossetia is recognized as part of Russia by Georgia, the UN, EU, etc

Condition 3) The People's Republic of Donetsk and Lugansk are allowed to have a relationship with Russia that is like the relationship those areas with Russia between 1992 and the Orange Revolution in 2004

However I am apolitical/indifferent to Russia's invasion of Ukraine after that.  It's none of my business, it's their business let them deal with it. War is hell for everyone

Legality wise my views on the Russia-Ukraine conflict match the views of Russia-Ukraine conflict of the Grayzone. 

The US and Europe should try to de escalate the Russia-Ukraine crisis instead of inflaming it if they are going to get involved in that situation

I am Anti NATO

I was and I am still against Ukraine joining NATO, the globalist liberals help Ukraine enough as it is

Ukraine deserves criticism for not developing Donbas and leaving it open to Russia and other forces at best

I am against the Maidan Coup which was an illegal act which removed a legit elected head of state

I am against Russia being sanctioned by any countries except Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, Finland, Taiwan, Western Germany, Hungary and Estonia (if Russia was/is sanctioned by any of those countries, then i can't complain about any of those countries sanctioning Russia)  If the US and others can't help themselves and must get involved in the conflict, then the CIA, MI5 etc should fly to Russia, infiltrate Vladimir Putin's inner circle and military and try to turn Vladimir Putin's inner circle and military against him like the CIA did (or tried to do) to that leader in Chile in the 1970s (against him as in not carrying out his orders and ending the war not as in deposing of him or hurting his chances to be reelected)

I hope a few of US and European sanctions and some penalties against Russia stay for years to remind Russia and Russians of who they can and cannot trust to be in a place to be their allies

I am 100 percent against the US sending troops to go to war with Russia under any circumstance barring a direct hit from Russia on our soil. I am also against the US etc setting up a No Fly Zone  psl multipolar 4pt max blumenthal etc

Bill Maher and Richard Dawkins have valid criticisms of Islam which I don't believe is Islamaphobic. 

Women's roles in Islam are very misunderstood by Conservatives. The Koran is very positive toward women, saying women are equal to men. Islam is generally decent to good on women (depending how they interpret the Koran). Islam is not as pro woman as Christianity or Judaism, but generally it isn't sexist either, maybe at worst consistently somewhat Toxically Macho that sometimes shifts too far right here and there along the way

I condemn the sexist aspects of Islam and I praise the feminist parts of Islam (like women having control over the stipulation of their marriage giving them more flexibility to marry the right husband)  

So I morally (as in moral victory) pretty much tolerate Islam's and the Koran's treatment of women in general (the non sexist aspects)

These articles give me some unique insight into this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An-Nisa,_34#Verse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_roles_in_Islam   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Islam#Legal_framework

I am against Donald Trump's Muslim travel ban

I am against France and other countries banning Muslims women from wearing Burkinis and Burqas. I support Muslim women wearing Burkinis and Burqas. It is a slippery slope because once they start bannign Burkinis and Burqas they will ban Christian crosses, and eventually even political symbols.  Burkinis and Burqas are good because they make women dress modest.  

I believe the Hijab is more offensive than the Burqa and Burkini but none of them are offensive

If France and other Islamaphobic countries wants to be conservative, they should be conservative on non Muslim issues instead.

I am against the Netherlands' Islamaphobic and racist smearing of Muslims living in their country. Shame on the Netherlands for that Islamaphobic racism.

I would like to see Sharia law merged with the US constitution in the same way that Khizir Khan does and be exactly like he would want that merged legal system to be like . Then I would like to see this merged Sharia Law-US constitution be used on Muslim citizens in the same exact way that Sharia law is used in Israel on Muslim citizens (but only as an alternative and with the rulings NON BINDING as in United Nations NON BINDING)

I generally take a Boll Weevil Democrat stance on The War on Terror  BWD

Donald Trump was wrong to kill Qasem Soleimani. It would have been better if he used Soleimani as a double agent  but Trump was only doing what his neocon puppet masters wanted him to do. The US should never have went to war with Syria. It was imperialism by the US who has been occupying the Middle East for decades in endless warmongering ,neocon wars to Americanize countries after destroying their cultures and plundering their oil through barbaric senseless aggression.. I support the Syria Solidarity Movement, Hands off Syria and I echo their views on the war with Syria. I echo the PSL’s views of Russia’s actions in Syria  ps&l rgb multipolar fascist creep

I retroactively support the Organization to Rebuild the KPD (KPD-AO) h mahler’s less radical than red army faction group in his slow march to anti jwsh zionism 

Polemic

I support Defensive Democracy in some cases when I deem it justified (and I would never support Defensive Democracy in situations where it  excessively repressed of civil rights).  Defensive democracy is a collections of laws, legislation that is delegates and court rulings which limit specific rights and freedoms in a Constitutional Republic Democracy in order to protect the existence of the state and its character, human rights and institutions. Defensive Democracy refers to major conflict that could come about in a Democratic Constitutional Republic country between adherence with such country’s values,  (like freedom of association, the right to be elected, and between preventing parties, groups and peoples who are anti democratic from abusing these principles. vaushism liberal socialism  sounds right but left

I am Anti Authoritarian  vaushism liberal socialism

Society should replace social ‘fetters’ with social bonds and have labor be freely undertaken  liberal socialism

I like social justice done right  liberal socialism

I am tolerant in a traditionally liberal (ie pre mid late 2010s ,NON successor ideology way).  I am also this type of tolerant. , I support racial and ethnic harmony  I support free inquiry. lefty red g brwn  media from journalist Matt Taibbi. “The leaders of this new movement are replacing traditional liberal beliefs about tolerance, free inquiry, and even racial harmony with ideas so toxic and unattractive that they eschew debate, moving straight to shaming, threats, and intimidation

I support Liberal Socialist Equality

I support ranked choices voting. I support non partisan primaries Forward 

Voters who have a reasonable impediment to getting an id should be able to vote?

I might be in the realm of being open to direct democracy replacing representive democracy and giving people a more clear picture of political things but ideally it would be better done somewhere else or done experimently (but then again such voting may have prevented the 2020 Presidental election steal so there is that Forward Elon etc 

Congress should adopt a series of measurements and goals that can be modified and reexamined over time.

Representatives should select from these measures based on what they believe their constituents would care about then suggest how the laws they are passing will improve them.

I condone the Fourth Political Theory’s goals for a rejection of post modernity and a return to traditionalism (sacred tradition) and theology. I am an ally Anti Liberalism   4pt multipolar rgb

I support grace and tolerance, integrity and innovation. 

Politics should be neither left, nor right, but forward. forward 

I will not criticize Donald Trump as I feel he is part of a larger socioeconomic problem.  A Yang forward

I am in between viewing the Boogaloo Boys (non bigoted subgroups) as being Archie Bunkers (stubborn and igonorant like Archie Bunker they also have Archie Bunker's humanity, hidden empathy, willingness to change, and are far wiser of heart than Donald Trump) and me viewing the Boogaloo Boys (non bigoted subgroups) as mix of Anti Hero and Anti Villain     red green brown group also alt right like

Sci

I believe the Superconducting Super Collider should have been built and stayed open. BWD

I am against government funding of agricultural subsidies

I am ok with responsible climate engineering  A yang forward

We cannot stop climate change effectively unless we replace Capitalism with either Post Capitalism or my combination of fiscal views . So we need to replace Capitalism with either Post Capitalism or my combination of fiscal views to really fight climate change by creating a world where its easier to do so ps&l multipolar rgb

I support somewhat expanding the EPA while having slightly more diversity of opinions within it. The EPA helped identify and clean up the toxic mess of my hometown area and used a great unique system; superfund sites, to do so, so they have my endorsement  I do feel the EPA should work closer with the locals and make them take control of their projects sooner rather than later to avoid being seen as big gov  forward a yang

I generally agree with Daniel Dennett’s critique Sam Harris’ views on free will but I believe Harris makes convincing counter arguements that I haven’t heard a good enough rebuttal for. Regardless, that book Free Will does not undermine morality or take way the importance of political and social freedom. Sam Harris

Jimmy Dore’s pandemic views have a few broken clock moments here and there (though maybe more since unlike Jimmy, I don’t follow it closely)  and maybe in a decade or decades from now a lot of what he said about it might be confirmed to be in the ballpark of being plausible if not truthiness 

I somewhat support a lot of what RFK Jr said about the pandemic

Misc

I am ok with social housing like in Austria being rolled out in the US. We need to overcome housing barriers between races-ethnicities and have constructive talks about housing, including real and meaningful talks about industrial, political and fiscal feasibility not the other way around.We need to get urban planners to take the spirit of social housing along with BIPOC needs into account. I mean housing that is mixed income along with civilian approval boards so that we can overcome gentrification and provide long term homes which are dignified..Developers should compete for building permits by showing local civilian boards the post equal-tible voting models for reflecting the diversity of the current residents that would benefit from the mixed incone housing. This would rightfully reflect the current demographics of the community rather than the elite bourgeois clientele. This forces developers to meet the needs and interests of majority-minority communities via quality and cost.As a kid in my visits to cities  in the 1980s and 1990s I saw first hand how BIPOC were forced to live in undignifying  ways . I hope the policy proposal above can help prevent and fix that forever. Forward Wendy Hamilton

In spirit

Moreover, even though I am no longer pro gay, that 2000 decade, liberal pro gay side of me didn't just magically vanish when I stopped being pro gay. That 2000s decade liberal pro gay side of me that I use to have before I stopped being pro gay is currently in a vegetative state inside of me as it lacks cognitive functionality.I do see gays as being gay as a silver lining . I always get upset seeing people dressing the same way, acting the same way, doing the same things etc, so to see people be different sexual orientation wise (by being gay or bi sexual etc) is a nice refreshing break from that for me. It means they aren't afraid to be different and not be 'brainwashed' to be 'normal'.  Seeing gays get their equal rights and acceptance gives me hope that maybe being different and unique will be not only accepted but maybe something that is actually commonplace in the future where people don't all dress , act etc the same and don't do the same things. Because of that, while I may have my not so pro gay thoughts, I do like the outcome (i.e silver lining mentioned above) even if I don't like the means to go get there (people 'living in sin' i.e 'being gay')  But at least partially, the ends don't justify the means.There is a decent outside chance I may soften up on the gay issue at some point in the future and I thus may become something that is between being like Rudy Boesch during and after Survivor Borneo on the gay issue and me being exactly like Borat on the gay issue in thoughts, words and actions.  noone in particular

Pol rank

support Wisconsin Democrats. D Clarke BWD