Far center Third Party
Third Party including Conservative Party UK paternalistic conservatism ie One Nation Conservatism,One Nation Labour and Liberal Conservatism
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html
I am a …. Social Marketist (ONC/PC)
I support the Labour Party UK (One Nation Labour [which is real economic nationalism.- ec nat related somewhat to libconseevative and con p uk]/Third Way/soft left Social Democrat politicians and policies only ([ONL some PC]/Patriotism/Communitarianism/Blue Labour/Friends of Israel sect)
I support the Labour Party UK (One Nation Labour/Third Way [ONL/D Cameronism]/soft left Social Democracy [ONL some PC]/Patriotism [ONL and ONC/Communitarianism [ONL) /Blue Labour [ONL]/Friends of Israel sect)
Classical Liberalism (Lib Con) and Thatchernomics-Reaganomics (Lib Con)
Ayn Rand state actually existing economic liberal market system is an economic system that purportedly uses Ayn Rand economic liberalism but where in the the global exports sector or primitive sector of the dual economy ONLY, the government uses Libertarian paternalism through nudging/influencing the free markets (instead of state regulation or direct intervention) , the government actually has indirect significant state influence and unofficial partnerships with the private industry and free markets (in the global exports sector or primitive sector of the dual economy ONLY) themselves through the government using these Libertarian paternalism methods
My combined economic views can be described as One Nation Labour brand of Revolutionary Socialism (ymmv) and this can be seen throughout this blog
I want us to transition to a socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society (since I very often feel that the proper role for government is to provide national defense, a court system for civil disputes, a criminal justice system for acts of force and fraud, and little else) using either the worker path (Autonomy or New Libertarian (counter economics with a Libertarian conscious) economics) or the market path (Dark Mutualism and Egoism that uses Distributism (related to con party uk, patcon, onc) as a safety net in the local needs sector or the modern sector , A.R State AE Eco Lib market that uses Social Markets patcon/Social Credit as a safety net in the global exports sector or primitive sector) to achieve this)
In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, it would use Distributism as a social safety net for socioeconomic issues. This would mean , as a safety net, in the local needs sector or modern sector private banking would be dissolved in favor of Distributist types of financial cooperatives, mutuals (like credit unions), building societies, mutual banks and friendly societies.
There would be no or less profit-making basis in charging interest in this Distributist safety net in the local needs sector or modern sector
In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety net, there would be an abolishment of legal enforcement of interest-rate contracts (usury) issued by private banks. It would not entail nationalization but also would involve government involvement of some sort. This would also involve favoring the dissolution of other private financial intermediaries like insurance companies and industry funds.
In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety net, the majority of the people would be able to earn a living without needing to rely the use of the property of other people to do so.
As with farmers owning their own land and machinery, carpenters and plumbers owning their own tools etc. This cooperative approach would advance beyond this perspective to recognize that such property and equipment may be co-owned by local communities larger than a family, (i.e partners in a business)
In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set, there would either be direct or indirect distribution of the productive assets) (means of production) in some ideological circles which would include the redistribution of wealth , to a wide portion of society instead of concentrating it just in the hands of a minority of wealthy elites .
In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set, there might be a distributism-influenced social capitalism (also known as social market safety net as in the global exports sector or primitive sector part of this market path) in this safety net or a more socialist-oriented model like distributism-influenced libertarian socialism. Examples of these Distributism safety net methods of would include direct productive property redistribution, taxation of excessive ownership of property, and small-business subsidization
In this market path, in the local needs sector or modern sector, if and when Distributism is used as a safety set, there would be strong antritrust laws and some sort of guild system.
The existence of labor unions in this Distributism safety net would not constitute a realization of this facet of distributist safety net order, as labor unions are organized along class lines to promote class interests and class struggle.Guilds on the hand would mix class syndicates that would be composed of both employers and employees who would cooperate for mutual benefit, thereby promoting class collaboration. This doesn't mean that there would be no trade unions though.
If we divide this dual economy on this market path by primitive sector economy and modern economy, the AE Eco Lib system would be used in the primitive sector, and it would follow this model, by using the A.R State AE Eco Lib system to drive the laborers from the primitive sector to the modern sector (that uses Mutualism as their economic system). This would create more development, since if we use this form of dual economy on this market path, we will need more development due to using a Mutualism economy for the modern sector
But growth in the primitive sector must not be negligible and its output should be sufficient to support the whole economy with food and raw materials.
A.R State AE Eco Lib fuses actually existing Ayn Rand economic liberalism with Ayn Rand state economic liberalism.(libcon and formely boris johnson)
If there are issues using the above A.R State AE Eco Lib system in this market path in either the global export goods sector or primitive sector on our way to a libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society , in the global export goods sector or primitive sector only, we would scale back the A.R State AE Eco Lib’s ‘free markets’ (Fascism for auth left theme) and temporarily switch to a Social Market patcon/Social Credit for the global exports sector or the primitive sector only, for our transition to an libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society until we were able to switch back to an A.R State AE Eco Lib ‘free markets’
With a temporary Social Market/Social Credit in this market path, in the global export goods sector or primitive sector , it would include free market capitalism alongside moderate economic intervention (patcon Lib Con/Boris Johnson Libertarianism) (and possilikely more) in order (at the very least when necessary fascism/PC/tolerated by ONC)) to ensure fair competition as we break out of the possible jam including with the government issuing debt free money directly to consumers or producers in the global export goods sector or primitive sector only on the condition that that they sell their product below cost to consumers) along with a moderate welfare state including pensions, health care, unemployment benefits, and maybe, a national dividend and or universal basic income (but only for the global export goods sector or primitive sector only) patcon
Using this temporary safety net for the global export goods sector or primitive sector, it would still preserve staples of A.R State AE Eco Lib like private property, free trade, unregulated prices etc.
It would allow , in the global export goods sector or primitive sector only, temporary social control of credit and increase consumer's purchasing power and decentralize economic power. Money would act as a medium of communication by which consumers would temporarily direct the distribution of production. scoccred
There would be more money and purchasing power for people soccred
Furthermore, this temporary safety net in this market path, in the global export goods sector or primitive sector it would reduce poverty and still allow economic freedom in this transition in this sect .
But eventually we would we would need break free of this temporary safety net and go back to A.R State AE Eco Lib system in the global export goods sector or primitive sector
If I wanted to use Left acceleration to get to our socialistic society/libertarian-egalitarian anarchist/voluntary society by design without using it to do so by accident, here is what I would do.
I would want our society to switch to a primarily meritocratic market-based system, with a combination of a balanced (cautionary and reform) and somewhat more limited equality of opportunity with a Merit based opportunity system. This is further good because I support empowering opportunity (pro metriocracy ONC/also fascist). Let’s call this method of Left acceleration ‘Collectivist Populist fiscal paternalism’
In this Collectivist Populist fiscal paternalism’ system, parents would be heavily encouraged or maybe even incentivized to raised their children like this this parent raised his child (dinesh uk conservative) and to promote better education so the child has the best tools they need to get a fair chance (but a fairer chance than in a pure Merit Based Opportunity system since there would Equality of Opportunity, albeit a somewhat more limited version of it).
This would also include a Equitability of Outcome based on the Fairness Model but also heavily encourage entitleds to counteract the Equitability (meaning if one worker goads the boss into everyone getting more pay but all being equal, then another worker who was the highest paid worker before this Fairness model Equitability of Opportunity was put in place then would ask for their own salary to be raised so they can be the highest worker again instead and so on)
During economic downturns or recessions ,the above system would have safety nets from forms of socially liberal neutered (Lib Con tolerant) Socialism which are fairer, more just and more equal than other forms of Socialism (ONL) , to give some security and dignity to people who fall onto hard times, regardless if they are most talented and abled workers in our society.
However in times of major economic inflations or depressions (like the Great Depression), the system would switch to just the Merit Based Opportunity System mentioned above along with implementing the Conservative Party UK’s Big Society (pc and con party uk) as a stimulus safety net for laid off or fired workers etc (and maybe incentives for them to take lesser jobs during said inflations or depressions).
The The Big Society safety net would includes Big Society Bank, The Society Network Foundation, The Big Society school reform and Big Society Land
The Big Society Bank which would be funded by major US banks and dormant bank accounts under Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts. This would be used by the government to unlock charitable assets for big society. Up to one quarter of public service contracts would be transferred to private and voluntary sector in order to create a demand for the funds
The Society Network Foundation would be used “to generate, develop and showcase new ideas to help people to come together in their neighborhoods to do good things." It would be funded by the National Lottery funding and public sector grants.
The Big Society school reform would have free schools (otherwise known as charter schools) would make it possible for parents, teachers, charities and companies to set up and run their own schools.
Big Society Land would mean there would be community empowerment via new rights that are created for charitable trusts, voluntary bodies and others in order to apply to councils to carry out the services provided by the council. Such assets like shops, bars and recreational fields, which were privately owned but were of value to the community. If such an asset like that was later sold, the new rights above would make it easier for the community to bid for and take over the asset. con party uk also pc
This safety net would also include something reminiscent of Social Democracy welfare safety net (i.e similar to the Nordic model moderate to strong welfare programs(patcon) or something reminiscent of Social Democracy without adjectives strong welfare programs which may include something reminiscent of universal welfare and something reminiscent to Social Democracy progressive taxation [i.e taxation wealth re-distributing]) patcon ie pc
I am not an advocate of a command economy or a planned economy (patcon). I do support at least some (Paternalistic Conservative) regulation of the economy and conditionally a camouflaged command economy libcom but similar to onc and patcon view
I support using the full maturation of as a precondition to hasten that future hypothetical fiscal system However in times of major economic depressions (like the Great Depression), the system would switch to just the Merit Based Opportunity System mentioned above, with something reminiscent of Social Democracy (PC) welfare safety net for laid off or fired workers and incentives for them to take lesser jobs during said depressions.
Outside of the government’s direct involvement in the market as mentioned above, the government would also use Libertarian paternalism methods to nudge/influence investors, free marketers , companies and other entities within the free market system to keep the free market afloat and to prevent the free market from leading to financial crises and similar problems paternalism con party uk
I support a Tripartism of psuedo Maoism https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/the-uneasy-parallels-between-trump-republicans-and-mao-s-communists-20210705-p586ym https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-maoism-of-donald-trump https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitLiberalsSay/comments/uscuvz/theres_no_way_the_patsoc_movement_isnt_a_massive/ (that work for the people One Nation Labor), Social Credit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit alt rightish) and Economic Nationalism-Post Economic Liberalism (formely Boris Johnson when mixed w Economical Nationalism/Lib Con) fused with One Nation Labour Social Patriotism (One Nation Labour, Boris Johnson used to support Ec lib)
I support a balance between the Individual and the state in some NON US countries (PC) . I support Rugged Individualism for the US and most countries on Earth
I am Anti Laissez Faire Capitalism (PC)
I support free enterprise (ONC)
I truly support the working class (PC)
I support tax cuts (Lib Con)
I support lowering the income tax (David Cameron)
I support Austerity (Lib Con)
I support an amended Build Back Better that reflects my socioeconomic views in this blog but I can live with a Conservative Party UK amended Build Back Better (ONC Borisism etc)
I support a reimagining of Labor Unions that addresses the concerns of the film Blue Collar (1978). I am only a weak supporter of Labor Unions under our current capitalistic economy. (Lib Con/Recest/mesh w Con Party UK). Once we begin to truly transition to or become socialistic, I will be a Radical Cheerleader for labor unions
I support London Living Wage (Boris Johnson)
I conditionally support flexible labor markets with laws that make it easy for employers to hire and shed workers or to introduce laborsaving technology on the condition that such government labor markets are designed to provide generous social welfare, job retraining and relocation services in order to limit any conflicts between capital and labor that might arise from this process. This would be to mitigate any negative effect on workers that such flexible labor markets caused nordic model patcon
I am not Statist but I don’t believe my views show that I am Anti Statist (Lib Con)
I believe economics should be tied to social issues, and that socioeconomics should come before politics (Lib Con)
We need to equalize life chances so people can lead valuable lives even in our financially unequal society. (ONL)
CEOs shouldn’t have a booming salary while others’ pay is stagnant (but in a way that Lindsay Graham would agree with if he went left on this issue as far as he would allow himself to possible, and the Labour Party UK went right on this issue as far as they would allow themselves to and Graham and Labour Party UK met in middle on this issue. SSI can only go so far (ONL)
Corporations owned and operated in the US should generally pay taxes in the US (ONL)
I am ok with raising the minimum wage as long as the rich and middle class also has their average wages increased and or inflation goes along with that. Josh Hawley’s raising the minimum wage plan is practical and based (PC, Josh is PC)
I support Welfare like the Welfare that is done in Egypt but I am ok with some forms of Bismarckinist welfare. (PC, nord mod) , however with emergency safety nets that are a mix of one or more my fiscal views that I wrote above
Welfare Chauvinism has good ideas (Fascism) but it is a bit too extreme and kind of bigoted so it is a frenemy (ONC)
I am against Joe Biden’s strong welfare policies (Lib Con)
I am against Joe Biden’s Protectionism (Lib Con)
I support a incremental (Boris Johnsons former neolibertarian ideology is pro incrementalism) to moderate (Lib Con is pro moderate, the One Nation lib con, PC themes mesh with this gradualism) to shift to a NHS healthcare. ONC Con Party UK (with privatization ie David Cameron) , in particular clinical commissioning groups (David Cameron) (but in a way that Bill Frist and Lisa Murkowski would approve) to replace our health care with some Thratchernomics (Lib Con, Von Party UK retro) amended Health and Social Care Act 2012 elements (David Cameron)
I support a 2.35% rise in National Insurance over 5 years and a cap of 89,000 on lifetime costs in the UK (Boris Johnson sort of)
I am against student debt forgiveness. Young people already have their parents pay for their education. They have to learn how to live in the real world and student debt forgiveness is further pacification of them. They are too entitled and need to learn how to live like adults. Paying their student loans back themselves is the best thing for them
I strongly don’t support commercialism (PC)
I support hard work
I am neutral on first past the post voting but would support it in moderation (moderation = Lib Con, Con Uk moderation etc)
We have to be scared of losing voters so we must reject policies which cause us to lose voters (Lib Con)
I support devolution of powers (ONL)
I am a tolerant person who fights injustices (ONC)
I always defend human rights (ONC)
I support the Hyde Amendment but I also support the government using Libertarian paternalism methods to nudge/influence charities, pro choice groups etc to pay for abortions for women who want an abortion but cannot afford an abortion paternalism con party uk
I am not a fan of the fanatical conservatism and nationalism of National Conservatism , but I am an ally of National Conservatism, even incorporating some National Conservative views into my own views for various polemic reasons (Lib Con, also less harsh more ally in ONC)
While I support the Labour Party UK, I feel the Conservative Party UK are worthy opponents and I share similar sentiments with them. I would like their views would align more to my views (ONC but reverse)
I support the preservation of established institutions, culture (PC) and traditional principles (but not ad traditional as Classical Conservatism [Lib Con]) within a political democracy in combination with social and economic programs that are created to benefit the ordinary person. (ONC)
I support nobless oblige paternalistic conservatism to help the less fortunate people (as long as it is not done through equity or parrity) (ONC) nobless oblige is left not bad bondage
I am also anti liberal, especially anti social liberal in all but a name [greater Con Party UK theme] (but not anti Left Wing) and I believe that Right Wing Populism is a good tool to fight against liberalism (Nat Con related to this sections greater Con Party UK themes and ONC esque)
In general, I am not a fan of culturally right wing ideologies(Lib Con) . The vast majority of far right ideologies are at least somewhat concerning to me (Lib Con, this blog section theme)
Paternalism is less bad when I look at it like the government is the parent and its citizens are their children and they are looking out for their ‘children’ like any normal parent would
I support family values (David Cameron)
I am a fair whether NeverTrumper. I give Donald Trump credit where credit is due but I am still not down with him . Like David Brooks, I admit that the NeverTrump movement has failed. Trump should have followed through with his campaign promises of cheaper healthcare and decent economic protections (PC)
I am not down with Paleoconservative but I do like their pro west views (Lib Con)
Some Right Wing Populists are the real ‘RINOs’ but some of their views overlap with my views (Lib Con)
The Alt Lite needs to become less edgy (Lib Con)
I would be able to tolerate Progressivism if it wasn’t so woke, bad type of collectivist and sympathetic to Democratic Socialism and what the US right wingers falsely call ‘socialism’ (Lib Con)
I am against political corruption
We need more socialistic type policies (including Social Democracy/Luxemburgism) , especially in wages, healthcare and education that will help ALL people especially BIPOC. This will help BIPOC better than woke social justice warriorism and identity politics can (Lib Cons put economics before social issues here I do that but in a left wing ie way based on Daily Kos bipoc poster echoed echoed this)
I am pragmatically Liberal Conservative on Mugabeism
I am paternalistic toward LGBTQ people . I believe other non LGBTQ people should also use their hetero positions to advocate for LGBTQ rights while non LGBTQ politicians should use their position of power go help the LGBTQ community. Like someone who is at the top of a ladder reaching down to pull people stuck on the ladder up con party uk paternalism patcon
I support some aspects of LGBTQ conservatism (Con Party UK is pragmatic conservative)
Queer paternalism and the Max Stirner inspired brand of Queer Anarchism are the pro Queer rights methods I like because as it seeks positive change for Queer people in the best way
Legality wise, I yield to gay marriage being legal , I don’t fight against gay marriage and I don’t want gay marriage to stop being legal (David Cameron) .My reason for yielding to gay marriage being legal (and for me not fighting against gay marriage and me not wanting gay marriage to stop being legal) is because in my heart of hearts, I FEEL that it should not matter if commitment is between a man snd woman, man and man or woman and woman. It’s not just about equality but also about commitment. Conservatism (which make up some of my political views) values the ties that bind us, that society is stronger when people make vows to each other and support each other. So in that weird way, gay marriage meshes with Conservatism thus why I have this view.(David Cameron)
I pragmatically (Con Party UK) believe unmarried heterosexuals and unmarried transgays [my own twist] (transgay to gay is what trans male is to male and trans female is to female it is different than gay and transgender) should be allowed to adopt children But maybe in the not so distant future I will also says unmarried gays should also be allowed to adopt children too (David Cameron’s ‘evolution’ on this issue)
We need non id pol economic policies which indirectly remove workplace hierarchies which will naturally end workplace discrimination of LGBGT people. This means by phasing out Capitalism for non Capitalist socio economic systems etc. Workplace discrimination of LGBTQ people is bad to working class people of all stripes as any discrimination practices between demographic sections of the working class cause a very divisive practice hurting the development of working class consciousness , creating barriers to class unity to take away attention from class exploitation which bolsters the rich So by fighting indirectly ending LGBTQ discrimination via ending workplace hierarchies through the above socio economic shift, it can help all workers of all sexual orientations since without the distractions of anti LGBTQ bigotry, their attention would then shift to the evils of the rich corporate crony capitalists which would lead to the overthrow of those rich corporate crony capitalists, leading to the betterment of ALL people (i.e a fully functioning society), not just LGBTQ in all aspects. If you think this is a selfish motive (help LGBTQ) by doing something that appears woke (ending LGBTQ discrimination albeit indirectly), I won’t correct you. (Lib Cons put economics before social issues here I do that but in a left wing ie CSUSA way)
Personally, I am Eight Political Position lean Liberal Conservative on repealing Section 28 of the Local Government repeal Act 1988 (in spirit of David Cameron)
Legality wise, I conditionally support repealing Section 28 of the Local Government repeal Act 1988 because I am an Anarcho Libertarian/Paternalistic Queer Anarchist (on the condition that the government doesn’t groom people to be gay) (pretty much David Cameron)
Due to Lesbian Erasure being pushed by some Transgender activists, I feel the T should be dropped from LGBTQ as punishment for the Lesphobia in the Trans community until they treat Lesbians as equals to homosexuals (Lib Con and buff shooter both said drop the T)
Personally and systematically, my views on Transgender rights match the Conservative Party UK’s views and policies on Transgender rights
I am against banning conversion therapy for transgender people due to Libertarian reasons (Boris Johnson)
I am Liberal Conservative on whether I believe that gender dysphoria is a mental disorder (personality disorder) and should be called Gender Identity Disorder (also buff shooter)
I feel Polyarmy while very bad is less bad for transgender people and as such I believe in moderation for legalizing Polyarmy but only for Transgender people. I am fully against Polyarmy being legal except for maybe Transgender people and only moderately (moderation is staple of Lib Con and this blog sections themes)
I support social solidarity (PC) and liberation which will lead to a classless society without hierarchy (Alt Right like Buff shtr) This is a natural progression. We might need to use a stew of Anarcho Egoism (anti path altruism but far left version , anti path altruism is Rightpedia counter to whites being woke), Right Civic Nationalism (see Anarcho Egoism explanation) and or white grievance politics (see last two explanations) along with PC anti wokeness as full maturation if this ideal society also meshes with Buff shtr and Alt Right
I venerate pluralism/In some ways I am cool with Cultural Regionalism
I have a love hate in all but a name relationship with the European parliament / I see positives in the EU (glass half full) (David Cameron/Lib Con? etc)
I always champion the community
I believe the government should abolish hate crime laws and instead use Libertarian paternalism methods to nudge/influence DAs to give hate crime like sentences for criminals who commit hate crime against protected groups . I also want the government to use Libertarian paternalism methods to nudge/influence people not go commit hate crimes in the first place paternalism is con party uk
I am a Civic Nationalist (as long as they come here legally or legally in spirit) (Lib Con)
I am an ally of American Gaulism (Boris Johnson)
I can get behind openness and tolerance about American identity and heritage (ONL)
I believe a form of Joe Biden Patriotism combined with First World Nationalism along with the repartition laws of Ethnic Nationalism (like automatic or rapid citizenship to persons of diasporas of their own dominant ethnic group, if desired i.e Israel’s Law of Return) might be a decent or even good policy to implement in the future on Mars or other space colonies or in a century or more in Earth (but not in a xenophobe or deprecating way) (Boris Johnson)
On the issue of parental consent for minors getting abortions, I am provisionally against slightly lean Liberal Conservative (which basically means I have a unique view on it that wouldn't po left center Democrats or moderate Democrats). from left blog
I support a UN non binding resolution which tells all abortion friendly countries to ban most types of abortion after 20 weeks
I support the negative motion by Fiona Bruce (Con Party UK) to the three parent babies law . The Conservative Party UK only legalized that because they were either tricked or brainwashed to do so. It was a huge mistake
I support a combination of these views on feminism expressed here (Con Party UK) and how Josef Stalin championed women’s rights in he USSR (Left Auth also overlaps with Bfflo shtr sort of). We must phase out Capitalism incrementally or maybe even moderately (LibCon moderation, neo libertarian incrementally Boris Johnson used to be a neolibertarian). (only leaving salvageable forms of Capitalism that work for the people [ONL] and are only used in mixed economies) to be replaced with better socio economic systems to break down hierarchies to give women true equality that they had in the USSR (see above USSR explaination)
Forced marriage is barely above bondage and thud it is abhorrent . The best way to ban forced marriage is to do it in a way that makes nearly all of the people who want to do forced marriage to instead want to do free marriage (using methods seen in romance media to do so) (David Cameron but a little different)
I am not down with Criminal Justice reform. I only condone incremental to moderate (see above incremental/moderate explanation ie former BJ neolibertarian to Lib Con) changes in background issues to Criminal Justice
I pragmatically (Con Party UK is pragmatic) support a Center Wing version of the police state (Boris Johnson) for the UK only since the UK needs to get tougher . In particular I am ok with some crime bills in the UK from the 2010s and 2020s (BJ)
I am pragmatically (prag is a Con Uk ideology) half heartingly ok with the Blue Lives Matter movement
I am glad that some Conservative Party UK members support bringing back the Death Penalty , while I disagree with them bringing it back, its good to see a diversity of views on issues like that, especially in the UK
recreationally (though possible exception for non synthetic Marijuana in some cases I have an anti Marijuana streak in me).
I am Liberal Conservative on red flag laws, teachers being armed and gun free zones
I support between incremental to slightly more than moderate (see above incremental/moderate explanation ie former BJ neolibertarian to Lib Con) shift to smart guns and gun manufactures creating less guns of all types
If I wasn't poed about the US being warmongers ,policeman/big brother/parent to the world, I'd be a Neocon. This means as a Neocon, I would think in some weird way that the US being proped up to be policeman/big brother (via wars and conflicts) to lesser countries like Cambodia (during the Cambodian Civil War), or Kuwait (during the Gulf War) and similar countries was so blatant and over the top it was like the US's actions in doing those things was 'so bad they're good' .It was almost like a strange war parody of a country (the US) on its high horse thinking it has the moral authority and power to be superheroes to damsel countries via wars and conflicts since the US thinks it is the policeman and big brother of the planet. Haitian coup? US decides who is right, who is wrong and who Haiti's President should be and what rules should be followed after the US does it policing. This type of downplaying of American imperialism by myself tends to make me subconsciously pro American Paternalistic Big Brother to the world at times (sympathy for Con Party UK lib con neocon themes in showing sympathy for neocons)
Our tax money should not be spent on wars, that money should be spent to make our country better domestically (PC)
I am ok with the US protecting Democracy in other countries and standing up to tyrants in other countries because that is how the US was created and what it was founded on (standing up to the British tyrants and fighting for the creation of our Democracy known as the US) neocon lib on reddit
I am against globalism since it doesn’t stay in its lane (matches some aspects of this blog section theme). I much prefer free trade to globalism (Lib Con). Alter Multipolarism is a better alternative to globalism (ie less extreme version of National globalism ie multipolarism)
I am deep down toxically Zionist (with some elements of One Nation Tory Zionism) and pro Law of Return (Boris Johnson and blog section theme)
I have no issues with the Conservative Party UK’s Neocon, Pro Ukraine sentiment. It is authoritarian imperialism and that type if imperialism might be the only type of imperialism that does not drive me up a wall (for complex reasons)
I support Russia joining NATO (R Spencer) so I can tolerate NATO (Lib Con et al), otherwise I am Post NATO (ambiguous but anti nato like left)
Islam is not a bad religion. Some criticism of Islam is warranted (since some rare sects of Islam are wrongly reactionary)
I oppose the use of the word ‘Islamist’ as that label is offensive, divisive and unhelpful. We need non Muslims and Muslims to find common ground on so called terrorism committed by pseudo Muslims like Al Qaeda and Isis (David Cameron)
I am against banning the Isis flag (except in military insulations) since we live in a free country but I feel anyone who displays an Isis flag in public should be pressured in a compassionate way by security, police, vigilantes etc to (but not required to) leave any public place they displayed that vile and evil flag while also being subjected to stop and frisk type policies on site by security or police (Boris Johnson but harsher)
I was for the Iraq War until March 2003 (I was briefly something of a Neocon [Lib Con]) then I turned against it for good and I am still against it
I supported the Sunni Mujahideen in the 1980s (temporary - only supported them vs the Soviet Union during the Soviet-Afghan War) neocon also fits other blog themes
I would have retroactively pragmatically (Prag is a Con Uk ideology) supported the Vietnam War conditionally only if the US had gone full throtal on North Vietnam in the mid 1960s to end Vietnam War quickly without it leading to a war with China. If that would have happened as I wrote, there would be no need for anti war movements since the war would have ended quickly.
I support politicians working with religious institutions when possible (PC)
migrationist
As such, I strongly prefer for the US to implement the Labour Party UK type of ‘open borders’(since it isn't natural for people to have to go through a bureaucratic process to move to another country, borders didn't exist until modern times). Ideally, with the above migration policy, we would set up a system where this wouldn't cause migration chaos (I honestly don't believe that with those policies there would be anywhere near that many migrants moving to the US each year) But if we can’t or won’t implement the Labour Party UK type of ‘open borders’, then I want us to do the following, implement my type of strong borders one nation labour is of the labour party uk onl similar to one nat con
I am not against Cultural reverse imperialism/colonialism, I support Alter Cultural reverse imperialism/colonialism (i.e my type of strong borders but only if the US can’t or won’t implement the Labour party UK’s type of ‘open borders’ in the US like I strongly prefer)
For illegal immigrants already in the US, they would either need to meet at least 2 or more of these conditions below:
1) Lived in the United States for at least five years and were under the age of 16 at the time of entry,
2) Have graduated from high school or have been accepted to a college or institution of higher education,
3) Have good moral character
4) Are not deportable on account of a criminal conviction, alien smuggling or document fraud.”
or meet some conditions from a modified version of the 2001 Dreamers Act that is modified by Republicans , who after being convinced by this article, create a Left Wing version of that 2001 Dreamers Act
If they meet the above conditions as mentioned above, then they would either have to meet 1 (though possibly 2) requirements below for said illegal immigrants to be put on their path to obtain citizenship :
5) Obtain a diploma from a junior college or trade school
6 Complete at least two years of a bachelor's or graduate program;
7) Join the Armed Forces and if discharged, be honorably discharged; or perform part or full-time volunteer community service under the direction of the USA Freedom Corps or with an entity eligible to receive funds from the Combined Federal Campaign.
8) Demonstrate both a compelling reason why they cannot meet the requirements, and exceptional and extremely unusual hardship if they were removed from the United States. would be able to apply for a path to citizenship or they would have to meet a few requirements from a modified version of the 2001 Dreamers Act that is modified by Republicans , who after being convinced by this article, create a Left Wing version of that 2001 Dreamers Act to be put on their path to obtain citizenship
If illegal immigrants don’t meet the conditions of 1) or 2) (or adjacent criteria in the Republican Left Wing amended 2001 Dreamers Act) in the first condition lists above the above requirement list but meet 2 or more requirements below:
1) Have been living in the US for many decades and who have at least somewhat assimilated (ie became Americans) 2) Have contributed greatly to our country and or have served in our military. 3) Have no criminal record 4) Are currently working (in an important or impactful job) or retired.
5) became illegal in the first place ONLY due to either not extending their visas, green cards or guest worker documents (including college visa) if it would have been reasonably within their means back then to do so and become legal 6) Would be willing to be incentivized to have dual citizenship with their previous county. 7) Can demonstrate both a compelling reason why they cannot meet the requirements, and exceptional and extremely unusual hardship if they were removed from the United States.
then they might be eligible for a type of ‘Amnesty’ that takes a Radically Centrist version of the of the Dignity Proposal and has the 1980s Ronald Reagan modify that Radically Centrist version of the of the Dignity Proposal with input from a Destiny inspired Nick Fuentes
If illegals don’t meet the correct conditions above, they would be allowed to stay in the US but be heavily and paternalistically nudged (libertarian paternalism libpat sim yo con party uk paternalism)by the government to put themselves into a system that fuses a very progressive LPR visa program with an updated feudal vassalage system wherever they are living in the US (or if they had to move for this work, there would be CRT inspired housing for them wherever they move to take the financial burden from them) This vassalage system would be like the one in Medieval Europe but updated and fused with a very progressive LPR visa program
Eventually the illegals would earn a green card after many years of being vassals with an eye to eventual permanent citizenship
I am against open borders , too much mass migration (Lib Con) and in general immigrants coming to the US illegally
If under my type of strong border system the advantages of the US operating big international institutions that help the poorest citizens in second and third world countries were outweighed by the disadvantages of my type of strong border system, then I would scrap my strong border system and have light borders (light borders means borders that are as progressive as Gavin Newsom’s border policies that are fused with Liberal Democrats UK (coalitions w con party uk) border system and platform) But at the same time with these light borders, the US would expand the Guest Worker Program where the Guest Worker Program is fused with the Action Z program and a Truck Wage-Company Store-Counter Economics program (including Cryptocurrency, bonds, stocks etc) to replace the current Guest Worker Program
With my light border system, the US would push for the creation of a Refugee Nation while legal and illegal immigrants already in the US would be gently encouraged and incentivized by NGOS and indirectly by the government to assimilate/integrate like the Jews in France assimilated/integrates according to The Jews of Modern France book by Paula Hyman . The deportation system in this light border system would be as progressive as Gavin Newsom’s deportation system that is fused with Liberal Democrats UK (coalitions w con party uk)deportation system and platform
Immigration should be designed around the fiscal interests of the American people and especially Americans at the bottom of the labor market. (Con Party UK and some of their ideologies)
I support the type of Brexit that Boris Johnson supported
I support more social change toward disability by in a dead center way, setting an example in the private sector (David Cameron minus dead center polcompball addition)
Climate Change
In the 2010s I would generally not support measures to prevent climate change by TheyWorkForYou standards. I didn’t really get climate change However I now do get Climate Change. I support net zero greenhouse emissions by 2062. In some ways I am a complete evangelist for carbon capture and storage. I am ok with a ten point plan for green industrial revolution (if it is anything like the Industrial Revolution but for green energy that is base ,especially since that would reverse the damage to our planet that the industrial revolution has done. I like electric vehicles for personal reasons (ie futuristic sci fi) and it would be nice to be in an old school way to be without petrol and diesel automobiles since I like retro things and having vehicles that aren’t powered by petrol or diesel is retro.
I support cutting what I deem as carbon emissions by 70 percent by the 2040s (give or take many years) I support more climate finance and green bonds (I had a savings account as a kid, bonds are related to savings accounts so hence my support) I am ok with common sense approaches to cutting methane emissions by 25 percent by the year 2039 I have a Eco Conservative streak in me which means that I support preserving the natural habitat and cultural heritage of a nation in order to complement each other. This is to conserve elements of the past eco and culturally. The Industrial revolution, gas vehicles, non green electricity and similar anti green elements all supplanted our traditions just as much as cultural things did and thus should be dealt with similarly. I respect Piers Corbyns man made climate change views even though I really believe he is way off base and basically wrong on that and Climate Change as a whole. I support Margaret Thatcher closing those coal mines since closing those coal mines was good for the environment. I support more Nuclear reactors being built and I support Wind Power (Boris Johnson)
I am fine with the way Boris Johnson and his Conservative party handled the pandemic . I won’t be against if the Conservative Party UK apologizes for lockdowns in order to win people to the Conservative Party UK side but I think the Conservative Party UK is too stubborn to do that
I pragmatically support the USA Today’s view of the Lockdowns studies by JHU
I pragmatically (see above pragmatic explainations) support zero tolerance rules in schools for students
Young England (support ONC). I defend Dengism (Lib Con) I do not support Joe Biden. He is no better than Donald Trump (Lib Con)
However, every bond worker in those alternate realities were something that is a mix of penal laborer-chain gang, Action Z (Left auth)-Noblesse Oblige (ONC/PC) and Encomienda system (like the one used by Christopher Columbus and his crew used in the Caribbean on natives during his 7 year rule). https://jngrks11272.blogspot.com/2022/04/hobby-areas.html
BJ UK. sort of views on BLM also echo the views on them are a combination of views on them by Dave Rubin, Mark Dice, Larry Elder, Van Jones, Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk (on a good day and with a pound of salt) , Ben Shapiro and Bill Maher
Tripartism (tri is three and third party is a blog theme) and Peronism
This would mean that I would want a Tripartism of unions, Libertarian Middle Class Communist (a mix of Pavel Grudinism and an exaggerated form of our current economical system) employee organizations, and a psuedo Maoism (weird exaggerated form of Trumpism- also meshes with buff shoter theme since he is alt right) government . There would be elements of Peronism in this Tripartism system
The main theme of the psuedo Maoism government would be to work for the people by seemingly speaking for class struggle and to erase class lines mao djt so all former classes would be in harmony with each other (nat soca) and it would use a camouflaged command economy libcom
It would duly select government workers and politicians based on its core values for promotion while any government workers and politicians modicum of power or self-respect are cut off at the knees mao
Tripartism is sort of would be like an alliance between trade unions and the caudillos peronism. This Tripartism system would be based off of cooperation, consultation, negotiation, and compromise with a bit of viewing issues through a black and white lense thrown into the mix mao djt . There would however be a distinction between the people (who would be united with the government) and forces opposed to the government tru mao
Tripartism model in this hypothetical future system
The psuedo Maoism government angle to the Tripartism negotiations
The government would unite with the proletariat resentment (including ordinary people/commoners like the rural masses and the core constituency of beleaguered working class/middle class [peronism] i.e blue collar workers and voters mao trup) against economic distress, establishment, corruption, oligarchy [peronism] elitism and decendance which would make it easier and better for the government be able to use Tripartism to assume negotiation between conflicting interests (peronism) to find and create unified and solid policies for the people fake mao.
During these Tripartism negotiations , the government would strongman at times tru mao but seek to do what is in all three sides’ economic interests djt mao due to the unique connections between these entities (via peronism etc)
The government would negotiate with employer organizations connected to banks on how they can use the national budget to use three quarters of that budget on socialist style entitlement programs libcom
The Libertarian Middle Class Communist employer organizations angle to the Tripartism negotiations
The Libertarian Middle Class Communist platform would include these values which would play a part in their tripartisim negotiation strategy and goals: (bourgeois commie pavel grundin 2018 platform)
The welfare of the people, not the rich people.
The use of the US’s wealth, natural, industrial and financial resources for the service of the people.
Credit resources which means the recovery of the economy by a decrease in Bank interest.
New industrialization, economical modernization and its output to innovation.
Withdrawal from the WTO.
Equalization of opportunities of regional budgets. Gasification of the country.
Basic foods, commodities, housing prices having price controls
In the interests of justice and development, being pro progressive taxes
Aboloshing the value added and transport tax, and the Platon system
Guaranteeing recovery for labor and the eight hour working day, providing work and a decent salary to people . Minimum salary of 25,000-30,000 rubles.
Stopping the destruction of the social sphere
Free and qualitative secondary and higher education and health care.
Fully supporting mothers and children. Equating the monthly child allowances to the subsistence level of the child. Increasing the payment of monthly benefits by a year and a half to three years.
Citizens a decent pension. Adopting the law on "children of war".
Maintaining the current age of retirement if that age is low 60s for men and upper 50s for women
Indexation of pensions to working pensioners. Cancelling the reduction factor of 0.54 for military retirees. Establishing the average old-age pension – not less than fifty percent of the average wage.
Protecting the spiritual health of the nation
Supporting massive construction of high-quality and affordable housing. Introducing the provision of flats or houses for young families, eliminating dilapidated housing. Declining mortgage rates to three/four percent. For some children and young families, interest-free loan for up to thirty years.
Curbing the greed of the moneylenders. Introducing criminal liability for involvement in a bonded transaction, prohibiting ocorrectors activities and assigning citizens’ debt obligations .
Protecting nature.
Ensuring the defense capability and security of the country.
Restoring democracy and popular representation. Making the President accountable to the people and the House. Simplifying impeachment procedures.
The Libertarian Middle Class Communist employee organizations would be made up of mostly businessmen and businesswomen who would be representative of the bourgeois class the bourgois communism of pavel grundinin
The Libertarian Middle Class Communist employer organizations angle to the Tripartism negotiations
The Libertarian Middle Class Communist employee organizations would either have increased government subsidies or would besides regular employees, consist of at least 10 percent of government employees in private citizen, non government roles ,some of which would also buy shares and stakes in the newly Collectivized Federal Bank (Wall Street style refinancialization libcom) (libcom, but added collectv part and nordic share stake part , in the nordic model the intervenes in economy through buying shares and stakes in corps as opposed to more direct means of keynesian cap, soclib cap and socdem) nordic model is used at times in tripartism and it also falls under the con party uk theme of blog) which would be split up as collectivised federations lib synd
They collectively would negotiate with government for more added layers, less layers or different layers of rules, regulations, taxes, fees and registrations on capitalism (libcom)
They would also negotiate for lower or easier to pay costs to comply with this increased, less or different layering. (future add laws, affirmative action,) libcom
These Collectivized Federal Bank people would negotiate with the government for massive amounts of capital, in order for them to have the borrowing required to keep their bank socialism afloat (so they could run their bank like George Bailey did in It’s A Wonderful Life) libcom.
Non bank employee organizations would also become collectivised federations libt synd and would negotiate with the government to borrow more to pay more entitlements to induce people to buy more of their products .
The government (who either via subsides or as private citizen shareholders or stakeholders in these employee organizations) would be interested in increased taxing and their unique connection (in part due to peronism) to these employee organizations would make that easier for them to pull offhence why they would like this model. The cycle would then repeat.
Unions may use the threat of revolutionary (i.e anarcho-totalitarian methods and mobbing) worker’s movements like their worker ancestors did in the early 20th century in places like in Russia (October/Russian Revolution) and Spain (Popular Front) as a negotiation tactic with the government and employer organizations in these negotiations libcom
These unions would negotiate with the government and employer organizations to endure mandated equality in all areas of work life at job and away from work to remove workplace heiarchies and discrimination which would create a more productive , unified , socialistic and serene working environment for all workers making those jobs run like well oiled machines , libcom but w worker part added(see cpusa thing)
The unions and employer organizations would try to negotiate with thr government to “creates jobs” by writing rules. libcom
The unions would negotiate with the government and employer organizations for more legal proections libcom
Just think of this above Tripartism set up as a true Problem Solving Caucus but on steroids
I feel it is good to use the Nordic Model as an asset against a angry Monarchy patcon
I am glad that non marginalized activists, politicians etc use their higher up positions to lift up marginalized groups to where they are to give them equality. It is like someone who is at the top of a ladder reaching down to pull people stuck on the ladder up. paternalism
Comments
Post a Comment