Conservative Liberal Parallel right blog

 Con lib/ specific etc  ie Malcolm Turnbull, Scott Morrison, Ronald Reagan, Dennis Prager, polcompball

https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

I am a Social Democrat (anti statist and Social Market meshes w conlib variety), Left Libertarian(including Mutualist but especially Mutualism lite [Libertarian Market Socialism] and non socialist Mutualism i.e Market Anarchist)/Minarchist, Anarcho (‘conlib on steroids what okanarchybuddy calls Anarchists’ Anarchist) Libertarian and Peronist (Menemism  con lib)

I support the Labour Party UK (New Labour/Jeremy Corbyn-Keri Starmer Labour/Third Way/Third Way Social Democracy)

My combined economic views are concepts of Economic Progressiveness (i.e SupCap, Neo Keynesianism, Libertarian Marxism, Democratic Classical Liberalism with some elements of Libertarian Socialism, some ideas from Communism other leftish wing schools of socioeconomic thought). This can be seen in virtually all of my economic views in this blog  

 note class lib is used by con lib, democratic class lib in link part above meshes w modern con libs, r reagan used democratic cap though not dem class liberalism)  eco lib related to con lib here its updated to eco prog due to con lib moving economically left too, supercap based off of class lib and con lib is based off of class lib, neo keynesian is con lib like

I want us to either have a New Keynesianism (connected to monetarianism via new keynesian ben beranke and similar to com lib), Peronist  (Menemist conlib) Social Market economy (con lib friendly) that uses a Social Capital (HumanisticCap fused with DemocraticCap r reagan was demcap earlyish) as a social safety net or to transition to a Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society 

New Keynesianism Peronist  (Menemist) Social Market economy that uses a Social Capital (HumanisticCap fused with DemocraticCap) as a social safety net

Based on a macroeconomic school of thought that would strive to provide more consistent micro-foundations to Keynesianism. New Keynesianism would be Keynesian in the short run but neoclassical in the long run 

New Keynesianism would provide theoretical explanations for a variety of market failures, mainly through Microeconomic Foundations. It would be not so different than the Ben Beranke model

Like for menu costs, the restaurants would print out new menus in response to their price changes. However, the menu cost would actually be the cost of the firms adjusting to their nominal prices. 

This burden would cause businesses to change prices slowly instead of continuously. 

The macroeconomic effect of changing a single firm's price on the demand of all products would be "aggregate-demand externality."

The staggering of prices: Using this New Keynesian model, enterprises wouldn’t set prices at the exact same time. Each would care about its price relative to the ones that are charged by other firms.  Because of this, the prices would be sluggish because no firms would want to be the first to increase its price significantly.

Coordination failure: Because the number of businesses is a lot, it's hard to predict what other businesses may do after the money supply adjustment. The failure of businesses to coordinate such changes in prices is a possible explanation for recessions that New Keynesianism would be used to point out

Efficiency wages: New Keynesianism would be used to show how markets might fail to clear due to the tendency of employers to pay above equilibrium wages. 

Abnormally high wages cause existing workers to be more productive and thus less likely to switch to a new job. New Keynesianism would shine a light on this

Moreover, New Keynesianism would have two models that don't appear in traditional Keynesianism:

New Keynesian DSGE model would shine a light on how enterprises and households are assumed to have rational expectations, but prices are set by monopolistically competitive firms and can not shift quickly enough or without cost.

New Keynesian Phillips Curve ,similar to an expectations-augmented Phillips curve, would show ho the trade-off between unemployment and inflation is only applicable in the short run.

New Keynesianism would better for Monetarism and Neoliberalism than regular Keynesianism is to them

This would be paired with a Peronist (Menemist) Social market economy 

In this system, there would be some National Liberal Conservatism (menemism national con and national liberalism here i fuse it) similar to Civic Nationalism nat lib including protectionism nat con which is menemist (or some elements of a modern Convertibility plan all menemist ), Left Wing nationalism (for legal citizens  fused with psuedo Maoism,     trumpism is like nat con of menemism when fused e lw nat it is nationalist syncretic just like menemism, lw nationalism also lw white nat), Eric Adams law and order (menemistic), generally variable to liberal policies on social issues (nat con+nat lib of menemism), Euroskepticism , strong border security , patriotic values (menemistic and fusion of its nat lib and nat con)etc  menem nationalism ad whole similar to civic nat 

This Social Market economy would use the above New Keynesian model. It would be rooted in free market economic liberalness (laissez faire con lib), along with economic intervention to ensure fair competition soca mark(in a New Keynesian way). It would provide a moderate or even more than moderate welfare state. socmark

This Social Market Economy would be manifested in a privatized market economy (used as an allocation mechanism) which output would be increased through moderate/New Keynesian economic interventionism on behalf of the state. This tri pairing could work and may even be complimentary, as this would decrease poverty and still allow economic freedom.

This Social market economy would be rooted in free market economic liberalism. conlib, New Keynesianism -alongside economic intervention in order to ensure fair competition,. It would have additional support for a moderate (or more than moderate) welfare state. In some ways there would be limited public expenditures  menemism

The main tenets of this Social market economy would be private property (including strategic privatizations like in Argentina under Carlos Menem cmenemism) free trade, at least some fiscal conservatism (menemism), unregulated prices, moderate (or more than moderate) economic intervention, along with other welfare measures like pensions, health care, unemployment benefits. There would also be an occupation of public positions by business people and flexible, level headed , fiscally responsible people (conservative buisness people menemism)

In this path there would be direct elections (maybe with ballotage) with the electoral college being abolished cm. menemism

During economic criseses there would likely be a shift toward Social Capital (polcompball says that is humanistic capitalism/democratic capitalism)as a social safety net (menemism) which would include either an expansion of the welfare state to mediate social class conflict and catering to worker demands (including social insurance and job training programs) demcap soc cap or Universal basic income (soc market soc cap). Other aspects of this social safety net would be redistributive policies like income transfers fiscal financing of education and expanded pensions demcap soc cap 

This social safety net would unite humanism (like the safety and health needs of people and the environment) with market forces using a market-based economy humcap soc cap with a emphasis on private enterprise. Demcap soc cap

This Social Capital social safety net would have a business world that would be socially conscious where investors would be content to recoup their investments but would not expect additional dividends hum cap soc cap. There would be conversion of time deposits into government bonds.menemism

There would be a blending of the non-profit and for-profit sectors in this social safety net. If investors would accept the decrease in financial returns for those on a social level, this SocialCap social safety net would become a successful force in driving economic and social change.humcap soc cap

Further more this social safety net would include resource allocation which would be according to both marginal productivity and social need. This would be determined by decisions that would be reached through democratic politics demcap

In this SocialCap social safety there would also be an autonomous democratic state that would enact policies which in effect would create a compromise between upper and lower classes, while it would remain compatible with free-market economic liberalism (as noted above).demcap,  conlib likes free-market economic liberalism 

This social safety net would also system include cooperative economic institutions including institutions which would facilitate the bargaining between the government bodies and business-labour organizations (like unions), and those organizations that regulate the employee-management relationships within private firms. demcap soccap

We would use a non Socialist Mutualism to get to our Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary (sounds conlib) society. 

We would first need to switch to a Distributist Libertarianism (conlibish) economy before using a a non Socialist Mutualism to get there

With Distributist Libertarianism there would be an economic system based on widely-spread property ownership and a society that is culturally based on Catholic social teachings. 

This temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy would not be operated under the belief that laissez-faire Austrian school economics (but it would use this type of Austrian economics conlibish) would result in an unfair concentration of power, but rather that the vast majority of concentration of power in a capitalist economic systems occurs due to state intervention in the economy (for example; Intellectual "Property", Subsidies, Inconsistent Taxation, etc)

In this temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy the state would only have most of its power in most matters over the Federal Government. There would be less taxation which would deplete the power of the Federal Government. In turn the government would be forced to give up certain arms that are no longer needed (like the ATF) conlibish

Distributist Libertarianism, entails that State's should have In order to achieve that, in the essay "Unlocking Existentialism in An Economy: Southern Distributism in a Nutshell" an idea was proposed that less taxation would starve the power of the. This would require the.

Moreover, , in this temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy , vertical integration would be banned to allow more competition within the market, and to later (as we get closer to our Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society) have guildsconlibs like monopolies within local economies to protect small businesses and workers 

This temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy would contain many dynamic thoughts from a Laissez-Faire approach. conlibish, to a more "Bull-Moose yet Hamiltonian" conlibish Southern Distributism approach. The temporary Distributist Libertarianism economy would structure our society in a way that maximizes human freedom and ensures a wide distribution of wealth.

Then we would be in our non Socialist Mutualism stage. In this non Socialist Mutualism stage, there would be local activist, alternative institutions and mutual-aid organizations formed and direct action 

In our non Socialist Mutualism stage , through self organization that is based on cooperative and libertarian participation we would achieve equality. It would be more-or-less market-oriented and more anti corporatist (until we restructure corporatism in our eventual Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society) than anti Capitalist (but it would still be anti Capitalist)

In our non Socialist Mutualism stage , corporations that are dependent on the state largesse would be seized by workers and others

In our non Socialist Mutualism stage ,redistribution of wealth would occur. However, redistribution of wealth would only be effected by the legal system (apart from the state) than through other methods of redistribution of wealth 

The redistribution of wealth would not be undertaken to bring about a particular pattern of wealth distribution, nor would it be effected through aggressive interference with people’s justly acquired possessions. Redistribution of wealth would not properly be the work of the state. 

Rather, redistribution would be effected by the legal system so that it would restore unjustly taken resources that were taken by them or their predecessors as interest. This would make assets that were stolen by the state or acquired immorally by the state’s cronies available for homesteading. 

That would deny the validity of privileges that were secured by the state which only serve to preserve the well connected bourgeois while causing the poor to be poor. Through solidaristic mutual aide, and via a privilege liberated market (as mentioned above) , people would eat the rich so to speak. Mutual aide would be used here because it treats people giving and receiving aide as equal instead of poor and non poor (so it dignifies the poor)

Other elements of this non Socialist Mutualism stage I would want to be implemented can be found here in this Alliance of the Libertarian Left collection (mostly Murray Rothbard during his alliance with the New Left)  new left m rothbard who was paleolib later so con lib is similar to him

If our non Socialist Mutualism to became bumpy or fell apart (like the USSR’s path to ‘Communism’, we would switch to Libertarian Market Socialist path (Libertarian Socialism with Market Socialism. i.e Mutualism Lite) to lead us to that society

Then we would be in our Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society 

This Post Statist Conservative Revolutionary society would be autonomous , anti capitalist and especially anti international capitalist. It would be part of a bunch of transnational worker societies conlib likes globalism  that would continue to be run with Libertarian socialism within a market socialist economy. But guild socialism would be involved now

The Guild Socialism (which is also libertarian) would advocate for continued and or more worker ownership of the Means of Production but now through trade guilds that would have an implied contractual relationship with the public. 

The guilds would also use some aspects of Social corporatist (sim to conlib) organizational structure and negotiating tactics that are based on a social partnership between the interests of entrepreneurs/unions and labor (there would be no capital or corporations since in our transition phase we phased those out). 

They would use collective bargaining and the limited/minimal state or post state adjacent would be involved. They would be mutually engaged consultations that are mediated by the limited/minimum state or post state adjacent.

There would also be even more democratic workplaces  soc corp sim to conlib

This would be amongst a backdrop of a supranational anarchistic limited/minimum state/post state (similar to what Mikhail Bakunin wanted) . These societies would have some culturally regional liberal chauvinism conlibish amongst a greater belonging of this type of supranational structure. 

There would be a monarch adjacent (leader) that is counterposed against state or state adjacent bureaucracy, a representative for the people against the limited/minimum state or post state adjacent.

These societies (with big bank broken up and run Mutually) would be autonomously patriotic

These societies would have a Meritocratic (conlibish) system like this but where the community itself gets to decide themselves. This also entails ecological protection of the workers land that they helped create through blood, tears and sweat

These societies might be a Minarchist state with limited or minimal state . This would include temporary measures with a social safety net that benefits the working class (but ideally and likely using non state authority since this Minarchist state would likely have no control over the monetary policy) .

With no state or a limited or minimal state, the Gold standard would be able to be brought back and we would might even have a gold based economy m friedman conlibish

Objectivism is not sensible

I generally support free market policies but I really support freed markets

I support increased taxing on oil, alcohol, coal, tobacco  (Polish con lib)

I am mixed on cutting taxes

I am anti statist

Personally, I would like the welfare system/state to be removed or to be downsized to become a minimal welfare system/state (i.e short term safety nets for the working class). Which might include ending or limiting food stamps, subsized housing, etc. People who cannot support themselves should get help from family, church, community ,private charity etc Legality wise, I support Welfare and Welfare Chauvinism (I am a Welfare Chauvinist). Legality wise I believe the welfare system/state should be removed only if it means abolishing the government and the bad forms of Capitalism (which we should be striving for)

I don’t care for Maoism since it started this woke mess we are in now

While I am a Social Democrat and I am pretty much okish with many types of Socialism (like Left Wing Laissez Faire and Left Libertarianism), I am against Equality of Income/wealth distribution, one word Socialism and Democratic Socialism. To quote F Hayek “if socialists (the bad ones) knew economics they wouldn’t be socialists (the bad forms of socialism)”. I encourage Conservative Socialists to join our side

I support national values

I support moral values

I am Anti Postmodernism. Post Modernists try to brainwash us and that needs to end

I downplay gay issues as I tend to focus on other issues (Ronald Reagan)

Personally, I support incrementalism for gay marriage (Neolibertarianism which is sub ideology of Con lib D Prager)  

I am an ally to LGBTQ conservatives depending on how they define themselves

Legality wise , I am Conservative Liberal lean undecided on whether I believe that gay couples should have parental presumption in terms of adoption.

I take a Malcolm Turnbull like position on whether I believe gays should be allowed to be boy-scout leaders, on Florida’s anti grooming law, and on a few specific gay issues. M.T

I take a Conservative Liberal stance on Transgender rights.  Any viewpoint that I don't list below on the transgender issue, I am Conservative Liberal  on. I am not crazy about gender ideology  (Alt Lite view sub ideology of some Con Libs)

I downplay abortion issues since it is so divisive . Fixing fiscal and background issues will help solve abortion issues indirectly  (Ronald Reagan)

Personally I am Conservative Liberal on late term abortion for rape, incest and to save the life of the mother

I am pragmatically (Scott Morrison pragmatic) against funding to Planned Parenthood (Libertarian reasons)

We shouldn't debate about Somatic Cell nuclear transfer because that is a distraction from our real problems. Who cares what Somatic Cell nuclear transfer, let's focus on real issues. If good comes out of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, then that is a good thing. M.T

Legality wise, I am Apolitically Conservative Liberal on Prostitution being legalized without being regulated and between Sixth Political Position and lean against Prostitution being legalized with regulation in any case regulation intensifies the risks associated with Prostitution. 

I am Conservative Liberal on whether I believe Male Privilege is real

I support strong borders (Scott Morrison and his ideologies). I am not a supporter of mass immigration or illegal immigration (related ideology Alt Lite)

Legality wise, on migration/refugees my ideal policy is somewhere between a a 'just short of a Path to Citizenship' policy (like the one in Build Back Better), a pragmatic slightly more conservative version of the Self Deportation policy and a somewhat more liberal Guest worker program that also fuses with Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party UK's Points Based Immigration System . I also favor a modern IRCA at some point in the next decade or so (Ronald Reagan) but a IRCA with a Mises caucus would amendment 

On free healthcare for illegals I between tolerate and support incrementalism (Con lib Dennis Prager Neo libertarianism)

I condone Australia’s hardline immigration laws under Scott Morrison in 2020 and 2021 since in 2020 and 2021 Australia needed to heavily restrict immigration (Scott Morrison)

I support Malcolm Turnbull’s migrant exchange with the US (assuming the migrants were vetted enough) M.T

I downplay the racial unrest issues and focus instead on fixing related problems that can solve those issues indirectly and unite all (Ronald Reagan)

I pragmatically (Scott Morrison pragmaticism) am a symbolic anti anti anti antiracist

I am pragmatically (Scott Morrison pragmaticism) against Criminal Justice Reform

I support pragmatic (Scott Morrison pragmaticism) law and order

I support bringing the Anti Drug Abuse Act of 1986 back but only for people in the future caught with future drugs worse than Fentanyl and for middle men/women in the drug dealing trade caught with most types of hard drugs  (Ronald Reagan)

I support American Patriotism to an extent (Scott Morrison)

I am a Pragmatic (Scott Morrison pragmaticism) Constitutional Conservative

Our great culture we have today originated in Greece, Persia, Egypt and with the Cherokee peoples (to name a few). Free Democracy was born out of that and spread to almost the whole world. (related to Con Lib)

I strongly dislike fascism (Alt Lite allies to Con Lib)

I don’t like Ultranationalism since it is basically xenophobic. But it suits its adherents fine

My views on PC, SJW and cancel culture reflect the IDW especially Jordan Peterson and Dave Rubin

I am against Censorship especially social media censorship (except when its used against the left)

I support Elon Musk’s free speech Twitter plans (I support free speech) .If liberty means anything at all it means the right to say things others don’t want to hear

I feel that Government bureaucracy might not be efficient

I am an ally of Liberal Conservative Republicans

Right Wing Populists do a fair job at echoing some of my values, policies and I like a few such politicians.  

But I am against Right Wing Populists saying utter nonsense at times and being rude. They need to learn when to shut up

Paleoconservatives need to be less edgy and less statist for me to be an ally of them

I ok with Traditional family values reforming as our way of life in a post hierarchy world (Post Scott Morrison Con Lib)

I am against Progressives labeling anything they don’t like as ‘reactionary’

I am an enemy (ymmv) of the Alt Right . The Alt right should clean their rooms and get wasted instead of being trolls. Their views are disturbing. They spend too much time online.

You can some up my political views as Kakistocracy (Scott Morrison and Dennis Prager)

Youth I only pragmatically (Scott Morrison pragmaticism) support the type of child 'labor' (ie home enterprise labor for children) that is in this link https://www.flickr.com/photos/56434318@N05/6620143751 (as long as its voluntary) for children around 6 and up and only if the children get paid as much as adults with higher incentives than adults in similar jobs

I support America’s sovereignty (ie Scott Morrison)

I wish our war political machine would focus more on conserving our values rather than intervening in foreign affairs. Bombing the Middle East did not solve anything. But I am fine with Ronald Reagan doing it

I between condone and somewhat tolerate Zionism  (i.e Scott Morrison)

I dislike Anti Zionism, especially the BDS SJW type

I don’t condemn Gavin McInnes for his anti war (states right view) views on the Civil War . As someone who is anti war, I would look like a hypocrite for criticizing his anti war Civil War views (neolibertarian related to Con lib)

Christian values are what makes the west great

I am pro environment but I am against the far left fringe of the environmental movement and minor things (non deal breakers)  within the left wing of the movement  ie Scott Morrison, Dennis Prager

I promote preservation of our environment and natural resources along with conservation, but not at the expense of the eco system or individual rights

I am fine with Malcolm Turnbull’s National Energy Guarantee. M.T

On climate change I am closer to supporting Productivism than to being a Climate Change apocalype person (Scott Morrison)

I morally (as in moral victory) support the way Scott Morrison dealt with climate change as PM of Australia (Scott Morrison)

I am Conservative Liberal on Voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide and my views on that are similar to Scott Morrison’s views on that (Scott Morrison)

I support incrementalism in moving toward universal background checks (neolibertarian related to conlib)

I don’t condemn Scott Morrison for his views on Transgender people in sports

Conservative  spot on spectrum only

I support the Conservative Revolution (Germany 1920s)