Center blog moderate by Broad Front Chile standards ie G.J moderate

 Center blog moderate by Broad Front Chile standards  ie Giorgio Jackson moderate

https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

Besides me supporting Third Way Social Democracy, I also support Democratic Revolution Social Democracy and Broad Front Social Democracy (type GJ supports)

I am against Neoliberalism

Prog UT Theory It overcomes the limitations of capitalism, communism and mixed economy. Compromise, slight necessary policy reforms (chile soc demish) and Anti Economic Extremism would be its core tenants (dealigned) 

I want Left Wing and (by Chile standards) policies to be implemented by Social Democrats and their parties in the the US, Europe etc 

This would be a decentralized economy where self-sufficient economic zones would be created and organized according to a set of conditions that would be predetermined (like socio-economic units).

I would want a Reaganomics (including law and economics) economic zone , an Abenomics economic zone, a Nordic Model economic zone (possible future chile social democracy ideology)  and maybe a less flexible Third Way economic zone within the US in this Progressive Utilization theory system

The Nordic Model economy zone would have a market led model that fuses together market capitalism with a large welfare state and a neo-corporatist bargaining system . It would try to implement universal public healthcare, public pensions, and public institutions of higher education, and much, much more but there would need to be a debate over the degree of these reforms, the speed of their implementation, and how to pay for them. chile mod.socdem

In this Nordic Model economy zone , the state would have ownership stakes in many of the country's largest publicly listed companies, owning 37 percent of the Nordic Model economy zone, zone confederation or country’s stock market and it would operate the country's largest non-listed companies,

This would mean the state would control business through shares instead of through regulation

The government in this Nordic Model economy zone would operate a sovereign wealth fund, whose partial objective would be to prepare the Nordic Model economy zone or US as a whole for a post-oil future while also majorly and powerfully  advocating for human rights. While it would be moderate, it would also have a progressive tilt to its early agenda (chile socdem non nordic model). Younger generations would get richer in this system

I also like the Nordic model because it is in part based on Lutheranism

I economically value realism, entrepreneurship, managerial skills, work discipline, reconstruction, individual self-reliance, stability, expertise , disdain of economic science (also mahm khom dealigned), competence, modern tech, gradualism(chile socdem)   and this can be seen throughout this blog. also khom dealigned

I support a strong democratic governance and institutions that are aligned with markets and social policies that work togetherchile socdem

While I value social welfare over economic growth , I feel that economic growth and social cohesion need not be mutually exclusive chile mod succdemish

I support the Chile 2019 social protests to quote the protestors “It’s not 30 pesos, but 30 years of indifference” chile mod

I generally and conditionally support market based economies which can be seen throughout this blog   dealigned liberal. I reject the status quo and radical centrism (also chile socdem) of free-market economics chile mod    I also in rarer times support a large section of the economy being nationalized. khom dealigned

I got an anti consumer streak in me (dealigned Liz Warren diff theme) but I usually override that to want consumers to be protected via sanctions by nation consumer services (which would also reduce and then phase out our consumer culture since consumerism is brainwashing and evil, see below)

I support unions being able to negioate collectively Yellow Socialism slightly diff than Chile crnter left model (maybe via organizing unions operating in parallel with groups of businesses in way similar to corporatism. Workers in this system would get a greater share of their company profits via negotiation between each union and the business group which corresponds with each of them. Above this system would be a very involved collectivist-paternalistic [my own addition] State.)

A progressive agenda in society is possible without society ceasing to be an attractive place for investment

I am against consumerism .. Consumerism fuels inequality and unequal social structures that create unequal hierarchies.  Consumerism is bad because people consume to increase their social position and to keep up with others. There is no good reason people should continuously buy new and new material possessions. It is against God to do so. God gives us what we need, not more and more garbage.

Corporations and the government push consumerism to make a buck at the expense of public welfare (due to things like social stratification, governing ethics etc). I also feel consumerism is bad because it is part of globalization in that corporations try to destroy other countries with their consumerism as they've done in the West.  Consumers are treated like guinea pigs that corporations try new and new tricks on to get them to obedient to their demands and that is wrong Consumerism dehumanizes people and causes people to live immorally. Consumerism is shallow, hollow and makes people think they need things that they DON'T NEED. It also causes pollution and hurts the environment etc. Consumerism is basically corporations making us their slaves and that needs to end People are compelled to use brand names since their identities are tied to brand names to compensate for other misgivings.  It is morally imperative that the state be a guarantor of rights and not consumer goods. The government should get out of the consumerism business and stop brainwashing people here and via senseless imperialism to be consumer culture warriors. (mix of my other blog views their views etc)

While I value social welfare over economic growth , I feel that economic growth and social cohesion need not be mutually exclusive  chile socdem chile mod

I support the Chile 2019 social protests to quote the protestors “It’s not 30 pesos, but 30 years of indifference”  chile by ext socdem

This student leader’s (GJ) views on education are eerily similar to my views on education but unlike his views on education my eerily similar views on education are also with my socioeconomic views in this blog 

I want to reform whatever new forms of Meritocracy forms in a Post Meritocracy world (parallel to Dem Rev views on this). The problem with Meritocracy is that Meritocracy is an illusion that thrives the economy but only fulfills the dreams of a few . I support a new socioeconomic model based on different homo economicus but without our constitutional handcuffs. This would create uncertainties for the 1 percenters (i.e the elites) who are stake-holding our assets and resources 

The 1 percenters (i.e the elites) are living the uncertainty that the 99 percenters (i.e non elites) have to face every day since the elite the 1 percenters wrongly hoard their vast fortunes  We need to fix this via a process instead of through government lip services or bandaids 

I never endorse a sitting politician more than once since while they may have good intentions they become establishmentized after being in a politician too long, I like new blood

I support a participatory democracy

I defend democracy in its republican tradition where the common good prevails and not the imposition of particular interests. The majorities should express themselves and decide and the minorities must be respected as such, only in this particular way will participatory democracy enable identities to be constructed in a respectable and tolerant manner. The citizens role is not just the subject of human rights but also of responsibilities within the community

A participatory democracy is good because it revitalizes citizens and thus restores dignity and legitimacy to social and political action . A democracy which is constitutionally republiced capable of guaranteeing universal basic human rights, respect for minorities, and groups who were historicsl,y excluded represented under a transparent ethical outline with instances of direct representation and binding participation. Permanent sovereignty is the basis for the construction of citizenry which exercises this right in all spheres of social life, shooting for the development of a democratic culture through all training and educational and instances; formal and informal.

Democratic Equality means all people should be recognized as equals without discrimination. It is the heroic aloof saviorism duty of the democratic state to take charge of violation and invisibility contexts which sadly prevent the value of democratic equality from being realized .So for those reasons, the state must assume a renewed and centralized role , while based on citizenship face injustices caused by Neoliberalism

Since the state is a political expression of organized society , it should not be a neutral agent but instead through a variety of creative and common sense, bipartisan methods not just economic but the distribution and the democratization of political, productive, gender, informational along with cultural territorial power and other spheres with inequalities exist . The state must manage and regulate (within reason) of the economical system , being the owner and protector of strategic resources and the enviornmentand being able bodied to participate in economic production 

I support political management with higher levels of transparency, participation, closeness (to the citizens), along with digital activism, citizen campaigns, public accounts done periodically etc

In addition, its management was characterized by raising the levels of transparency, participation, closeness to citizens and digital activism, reporting in different parts of the District with different platforms the details of his parliamentary work, through citizen campaigns, periodic public accounts

We all form and build the state which is for all of us. I support the creation of an inclusive and citizen state as the main guarantor of the common good and assurance of universality and decommodification of social rights at both a cultural level and institutional level

The link between the state and citizenship is a powerful tool for the conflict between our current neoliberal model and a society that guarantees effective social rights

The combo of a strengthened state and expanded social and political citizenship must work with feedback between the two . The more democratic and inclusive the state is, the better the state will collect the citizens will and the more effective it will be in its role (or maybe even paternalistic role) as guarantor. This is MUCH better than State liberalism and big brotherism by far

I support a state where power is distributed equally for the promotion and development of territorial and or national identities ,structuring itself in a way to generate real local governments thus being able toreaffirm territorial autonomy as a fundamental part of democracy 

I support reshaping political parties like this https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/Navegar?idNorma=1089164

I believe we need to be more principled on diversity and inclusion. Democratic deficits happen due lack of  social and political representation. Human rights should at the core of our political parties to drive them to guarantee their actions will promote equality and non discrimination. True freedom cannot exist if only some choose. I value diversity (in my own complex unique way). We need a new development model for the US that is sustainable in the long run and that is as just and fair as Equity but parallel to equity for Americans. We also need to build a new citizen state whose main objective is to search for equality and protection from abuse snd injustice

I support unlimited human rights and unlimited equality . I believe that equality governs as a fundamental principle which allows effective exercise of rights and self determination of individuals and peoples

This is why I support fuller equality where everyone can fully develop from their diversity with an inclusive approach along with promoting respect for the self evident dignity of people (modern egalitarian theory fulled with equal adjacent results or some other form of equal results). I reject the false Neoliberal promise of mere individual self determination, since that is only a privilege for those who can pay for it so that Equality model is insufficient

I believe in the integration between social groups where differences are valued in an environment of solidarity, respect, protection (possibly paternalism) and collaboration as a means to create a happy and democratic society. In this way, social relations are ordered through organization and collaboration over the logic of competition. In addition where at the individuals level their integrality is valued this is the affective, social and political dimension as opposed to merely an economic one. 

From a social perspective, I understand property and I consider its reason being found in the realization of collective well being. In this particular way, exploitation of natural resources should be done while at the same time considering the current unequal distribution of its costs and benefits and also assuming intergenerational justice and the biosphere limits as the guiding principals for political action 

Equality of Opporutinity could be seen as violating liberty and property rights in that it contravenes the true meaning of the Declaration of Independance and subverts the principles of a free society. (but for opposite reasons)

I believe gender equality needs to improve in politics too. Unequal representation of women in politics is the cause of our democratic deficit. Gender equality must be a principal which guides political action which is why I endorse mechanisms which allow women and men to apply to internal political leadership positions and in popular election positions. Not only do I endorse more women in the representation of the political parties but also in forums, seminars, training schools, and similar instances which give concrete signals based on equality and non discrimination

Legality wise , I am neutral lean this politician’s (G.J) view on this issue whether I believe that same sex couples should have parental presumption in terms of adoption.

My views on Interior enforcement meshes with the founder of this movements (G.J) views on interior enforcement with a touch of Bernie Sanders view on that

I am against the criminal populism of the Anti crime Short agenda. I support the measures proposed in the Crime is not a game thing and I also support the commission investigating Critical neighborhoods along with the investigation of the abandonment of the State in the most vulnerable areas of the country 

Sometimes violent protests are needed to be heard (as long as the protest demands are what I would deem as reasonable demands) . This is needed since our current institutions are not able to process social conflicts and to give a peaceful way to fix them 

I support removing the inequality in the education system including equality of access, a creative fiscally responsible, Libertarian way to fix student debt, fighting fraud of many for profit universities etc. I also support a tax reform added to our constitution to fix issues related to distribution of wealth and power .

I support and recemmend charter schools and homeschooling but I also support quality public education

I view Chile’s Broad Front pandemic policy platform and laws since early 2020 as mid 1990s to mid 2000s (decade) Anti Heroish and I feel a country like Chile deserves those type of pandemic policies and laws

We have to become a direct and participatory democracy so the electorate decides on policy initiatives without elected representatives as proxies and which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives. This will make the need or desire to protest almost non existent as people will cause most of their political needs and wants implemented through direct and participatory democracy. (about BLM protests without saying it)

I feel that women, Indigenous communities, immigrants, LGTBQ+ people, and other diverse groups should not only recognized, but be championed as key protagonists in the growing calls for social, economic, and political reform.   chile moderate    ip

I believe all men should be able to play women's sports and women should be able to play men's sports, that way it doesn't matter if a transgender person is playing a man or women's sport. I believe bathrooms should be unisex, and include urinals and toilets. I also believe that those unisex bathrooms should be a fusion of men's and women's bathrooms. This way the whole trans bathroom debate is settled.   in spirit only