Center blog dealigned

 https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

dealigned party switchers and Independents  Liz Warren, Bernie Sanders I D, Angus King I, Evan Mcmullin I  also khom as in khomenism which is a dealigned system,less flexible third way which is dealigned due to being less flexible, liberal economics

I am a Dealigned Centrist/Moderate Independent  

I support a balance between the Progressive Utilization theory and Reaganomics (especially law and economics)   LW

While I am personally never enthused on government intervention in the economy, I also support populist measures like massive government intervention in the economy to ensure free water, electricity and government provided homes for the poor  khom dealigned

I support making ends meet fiscal policies and this can be seen throughout this blog   (LW)

I generally and conditionally support market based economies which can be seen throughout this blog   dealigned liberal. I reject the status quo and radical centrism (also chile socdem) of free-market economics chile mod    I also in rarer times support a large section of the economy being nationalized. khom dealigned

I economically value realism, entrepreneurship, managerial skills, work discipline, reconstruction, individual self-reliance, stability, expertise , disdain of economic science (mahm khom dealigned), competence, modern tech, gradualism(chile socdem)   and this can be seen throughout this blog. khom dealigned

I feel that free enterprise (my brand as can be seen throughout this blog) turns the wheels of the economy. Prosperity produces social justice for all, including the poor. Sometimes we have to endure sluggish growth (mahm khom dealigned)  khom dealigned

Prog UT theory….. A planning (or central planning khomensi dealigned) committee at a national level would only outline the economic development’s broader aspects which would the cause its details to be resolved by local level planning bodies where problems are best understood and dealt with more easily (see diseconomies of scale). 60 percent of this planning committee would be made up of the national government, 10 to 20 percent of this this committee would be made up five semi-national governmental non oil foundations (they would not be accountable to anyone except the main leader)  khom dealigned

It overcomes the limitations of capitalism, communism and mixed economy. Compromise, slight necessary policy reforms and Anti Economic Extremism would be its core tenants (dealigned) 

At the National level, the public sector and government workforce would be very large. mhom dealigned

Progressive UT theory This would be a decentralized economy where self-sufficient economic zones would be created and organized according to a set of conditions that would be predetermined (like socio-economic units).

I would want a Reaganomics (including law and economics Dealigned liz warren as republican) economic zone , an Abenomics economic zone, a Nordic Model economic zone and maybe a less flexible Third Way economic zone (less flexible third way is dealigned economics) within the US in this Progressive Utilization theory system

The Reaganomics economic zone would be positively influenced by surrounding and other economic zones to fix Reaganomics‘ market and or voodoo-trickle down economics issues (like the less flexible Third Way economic zone dealigned)

The less flexible Third Way economic zone would have an economic system that uses Third Way economic policies that are less flexible than mainstream Third Way economic policies

The less flexible Third Way economic zone would have an economic system that uses Third Way economic policies that are less flexible than mainstream Third Way economic policies and governments Meaning this in this less flexible Third Way economic zone would less flexibly believe in a theory of  "social-ism" than mainstream Third Way economics believe in and less flexibly try to pursue the goals of equality and social justice in a framework of a Neoliberal society than mainstream Third Way governments and policies did/do

In this less flexible Third Way economic zone  , it would less flexibly fuse traditional social democratic goals with an acceptance of Globalism (more like National Globalism i.e Multipolarism) and free markets than mainstream Third Way economics/governments fuse them together In this less flexible Third Way economic zone, like with mainstream Third Way economics/governments, it would be built more on a more modern theoretical basis than Social Liberalism and Radical Centrism are, but less flexibly than mainstream Third Way economics/governments did/do

Moreover, in this less flexible Third Way economic zone,  it would less flexibly employ a "social capitalist" economy with free-markets and less economic intervention than Third Way economics/governments did/do . In this less flexible Third Way economic zone, it would less flexibly supports welfare reform and workfare while less flexibly pursuing other neoliberal policies like deregulation and privatization  less flexible than mainstream Third Way economic policies ally of dealigned

I support the socioeconomic democracy that the United States has managed since FDR and that was noticebaly growing stronger in the early 2000s and is still growing stronger today (dealigned)  also totalarian democracy

I support a Liz Warren amended version of Rick Scott's 11 point plan

I am ok with the Be HEARD Act since workplace harassment not only negatively effects the victim of the harassment, but is bad to working class people who aren’t victims of harassment as any discrimination practices between demographic sections of the working class cause a very divisive practice hurting the development of working class consciousness , creating barriers to class unity to take away attention from class exploitation which bolsters the rich

I conditionally support the the Child Care for Working Families Act, since it frees parents to spending more time to work. I support this as long as it doesn’t negatively effect the child’s upbringing

I support the Buffet rule

I support the OSHA enforcing workers rights to a hazard free workplace to create a productive working environment  

I got an anti consumer streak in me. LW

I support gradual reductions in various taxes

I support Liz Warren’s wealth tax of two percent on all individually held assets above $50 million dollars (a rate that graduates to three percent for assets above $1 billion). I wouldn’t be upset at all it would cause a distortionary effect.  LW

This student leader’s views on education (chile mod socdem) are eerily similar to my views on education . If Third Way economics would be applied to his educational views and reform ideas, I would want less flexible Third Way economics to be applied to his educational views and reform ideas instead of mainstream Third Way economics  less flex third way dealigned 

I respect the sanctity of private property and property rights khom dealigned

I support the government expropriating agribusinesses, large factories, and luxury homes that belong to former elites who aren’t elite anymore but I would never challenge the concept of private property khom dealigned

done I support the Welfare state (Nanny state) that is funded by taxes that use a taxation model based on all of my socioeconomic views in this blog combined (but my view that moderate means-tested  welfare targeted at the poor to ensure people can meet basic human needs dealigned liberal welfare being given the majority of the weight

I feel Obamacare with a public option is better in the present and near future than Universal Healthcare , Single payer and Medicare for All . I do think single payer healthcare and expanded medicare to all should be done in the future when it is viable and practical (and also as a safety net)

Personally I am mixed to abstain on the public option for healthcare 

Legality wise, I am mixed to non hostile on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare), as long as it has modest adjustments and provisions to the legislation if they can be done on a bipartisan basis. Otherwise we can do better than Obamacare

I am fine with a common sense, bipartisan, expansion of Medicare as long as it has unorganized (as in unorganized sector of India unorganized) elements to it

I favor cuts to entitlement programs like SSI, and means testing and raising the retirement age

I respect the 2015 Supreme court gay marriage decision since a gay person himself (Obergfell), legalized gay marriage via his court case as opposed to it being done via cancel culture, negative petitions where most signers are non gay, gay saviorism etc.  EM

In 1994, I supported S.AMDT.2434

In the 1990s until the mid 2000s, I was Radically Centrist on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell til I was syncretically dealigned on it

When I was a Democrat Liberal in the 2000s decade, I scored an 88 by the HRC

The most notorius strand of radical democracy is the Agonistic one wich seeks to expand democracy in equality and liberty. Another that the goal of democracy is to radically expand and extend all civil liberties  dealigned when wanting a cultural shakeup

In 2003 after Massachusetts gay marriage ruling, I was opposed to gay marriage but supported leaving the decisions to the states

I support in the same exact way that Elizabeth Warren supports LGBTQ marriage and rights but in a dealigned way, the Gay shame movement and destroying our heterosexist hierarchal society (including marriage ie the abolishment of state sanctioned coupling for people of all sexual orientations ie straight and gay) to form a post sexual orientation world where people would literally be sexual orientation blind). But if this becomes a mainstream view or even a mainstream Democrat view, I will force myself to be alt Radically Center right on the Gay shame movement and Heterosexism

I feel we shouldn't debate about transgender rights because that is a distraction from our real problems. Who cares what transgender people do, let's focus on real issues   dealignish p thiel

I support this type of feminism too  dissociative feminism

I proactively support females and mainstreaming of women into all spheres of life, even head of state.  Khomenism before he went far right

I support Left Wing Manosphere in Muslim countries  sort of Khomanism in sprit of what he should have done as Syotolla

I am against voter suppression . I want to protect ballot box access. I support bipartisan voting rights legislation and fighting back against efforts to suppress voters.

My views on the January 6 protest match the views on that issue of the Breaking Point hosts and  Mike Pence 

I support Referendums

When I want a cultural shakeup, I support a notorius m agonistic strand of radical democracy which seeks to expand democracy in equality and liberty and thus radically expand and extend all civil liberties  dealigned when wanting a cultural shakeup

I support cultural varation  as in religious rejectionism dealigned  ip

My political views jump all over the place, from Republican conservative Elizabeth Warren to Democrat Progressive Elizabeth Warren. https://web.archive.org/web/20190415142804/https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/12/elizabeth-warren-profile-young-republican-2020-president-226613/

I used to like what wealthy fiscal conservative-social moderates liked about Donald Trump, but now I see the negatives in Donald Trump that they now see in him. I also now see the positives in Donald Trump that many Latino voters see in him

I am glad Elizabeth Warren is anti gun, she is the gun salesperson of the 2000s and 2010s due to her anti gun extremism 

I am ok with expansive background checks to most gun transactions, with exceptions for transfers between family members. I am ok with limiting the size of magazines to ten or eleven and a half rounds, and to make purchasing a gun for someone not legally allowed to have one a more serious (but not Federal) crime. I do not support a ban on assault weapons, it will not work and such a thing is not based on the way those weapons function. of the weapons. Most gun crimes are committed with handguns, not rifles.

I do not support requiring a gun license to purchase a gun

I am dealigned on Criminal Justice Reform

I am dealigned on Ban the Box

I support the way Donald Trump fixed the opoid addiction problems in the US

My views on Juul match Elizabeth Warren’s views on Juul

Systematically, I believe there is common ground between pro lifers and pro choicers. Instead of changing laws to commit a never ending tug of war between the two sides, we should focus on more policies that support women, children and families, which has already caused declining abortion numbers for years. EM

Systematically, I use to morally (as in moral victory) want Roe v Wade to be overturned with repartations for every woman forced to carry out an unwanted abortion. But now I systematically, want the government abolished and self government to replace it to deal with the abortion issue  EM

I support the socioeconomic democracy that the United States has managed since FDR and that was noticebaly growing stronger in the early 2000s and is still growing stronger today   class dealignment not at either extreme, also far left blog for diff reason

Everyone on Earth is equal to each other in God's eyes and no life is more or less important than another life.  Equal means Equal. To quote Barack Obama: “Well, I say to them tonight, there is not a liberal America and a conservative America — there is the United States of America. There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America and Asian America — there's the United States of America. The pundits like to slice-and-dice our country into Red States and Blue States; Red States for Republicans, Blue States for Democrats. But I've got news for them, too: We worship an awesome God in the Blue States, and we don't like federal agents poking around in our libraries in the Red States. We coach Little League in the Blue States, and, yes, we've got some gay friends in the Red States. There are patriots who opposed the war in Iraq and there are patriots who supported the war in Iraq.”. (in spirit)

I believe there are two ,equally valid sides to the view that  Joe Scarborough had in 2005 on Thiomersal

I begrudingly am tolerant of Joe Rogan in the whole Spotify ordeal and I have no major issues with him having those particular doctors on his show in those 2 situations. Rogan also surprsingly had a plausible defense 

I support the Yellow Shirts (France. dealigned)

I have a strong sense of self and resistance to conformity and certain types of traditions (like graduation gowns w caps, dressing up for horse races, most holidays and similar things) dealigned

migration

Personally and Systematically I believe we should set up a United Nations Buffer Zone (patrolled by United Nations peacekeeper force) between the US and Mexico along the whole US-Mexico border on the Mexico side of the US-Mexico border to help would be illegal migrants  dealignish

Personally and Systematically I feel we need to clear the migration backlogs before (dealignedish, also centristish) we think about doing migration reform:  The backlog of 600,000-plus fugitive deportee cases. The backlog of 4 million immigration applications of all kinds. The backlog of an estimated 100,000 FBI background checks for legal immigrant applicants. The disappearance of 111,000 citizenship applications.   The above numbers are from 2007 but i am sure the numbers are similar to that today.

The Washington Post reported in 2007 that those loads of unprocessed paperwork was growing. Over a few hundred thousand immigrants who come here legally continue to wait for FBI background checks before they become naturalized. This backlog of the legal migrants' naturalization applications (and other benefits), from 2005-2007 for example doubled to 329,160.   

Personally and Systematically , I believe that the US thus should fix the above mess first before allowing millions of seasonal migrant worker applications to be submitted.  We also should clear the obstacles to a Path of Citizenship for legal migrants who followed the rules before we start impelementing the reauthorized 1986 IRCA for illegals.  Let's give legal migrants priority over illegal migrants.  

Personally and Systematically , my views on Interior enforcement meshes with the founder of this movements views on interior enforcement with a touch of Bernie Sanders dealigned view on that

Personally and Systematically once the backlogs are cleared , I personally and systematically support a 1986 IRCA type immigration reform reapplied today: (bipartisan dealignedish) Amnesty to vast majority of illegal migrants who arrived in the US more than 5 years ago and who have continuously lived in the US since then while penalizing them with back taxes, fines and admission of guilt along with proof they hadn't done any crimes since their illegal arrival in the US along with some minimal knowledge about U.S. history and government and the English language.   This would also legalize certain seaonable undocumented migrants more than current migration reform bills

This mass legalization might have the unintended negative drawbacks of causing now legalized migrants who are retired or when they retire to move back to Mexico and Central America . So if we need to keep that in mind and allowing them to remove any hurdles for reporting illegal. igrants in their own community (since there would be no fear of them being deported since they're now legal).  

But on the flip side, this would bring a lot of illegal migrants into the light immediately and allow them to have no excuses for not becoming Americans. To build upon the IRCA act, we should strengthened the sanctions and penalties on businesses who hire or recruit illegal immigrants knowingly along with closing all loopholes. ICE should be arresting bossees in the US who knowingly hire illegals as much as Ice focuses on deporting illegals.  

Moreover welfare or unemployed legal US citizens should replace illegals as the ideal workers for jobs that usually hire illegals (including jobs in growing sectors). This should be done through encouraging those unemployed legal citizens and pro illegal migrant buisnesses to mutually agree to that. The IRCA reduced illegal immigration for 3 years. Personally and Systematically , I support additional resources being sent to the federal agencies that process asylum claims to reduce the existing backlog after the above changes are made to prevent future backlogs from getting out of hand and adjudicate new claims in a more timely fashion. I also support a degrowth element added to the asylum seeker process.

Personally and Systematically I am against mass deportations. 

Personally and Systematically I feel we need to spend more time, resources and energy addressing concerns that lead to illegal migrants bring targeted for deportations and maybe fix the bigger issues with illegal immigration that go beyond deportations than we should spend on the whole deportation issue

Legality wise, I moral (moral as in moral victory) support  having this exact migration system in the US: that the Labour Party UK supports (since it isn't natural for people to have to go through a bureaucratic process to move to another country, borders didn't exist until modern times).  Ideally, with the above migration policy, we would set up a system where this wouldn't cause migration chaos (I honestly don't believe that with those policies there would be anywhere near that many migrants moving to the US each year)  labour another non dem rep party but in uk  labour has or had indy element to it 

Legality wise, my views on deportation match Labour Party UK’s views on deportations  labour another non dem rep party but in uk  labour has or had indy element to it

I am symbolically ok with The Keep Families Together Act https://www.king.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/king-colleagues-introduce-legislation-to-halt-separation-of-immigrant-families . Though making it a tad more conservative wouldn’t hurt. AK