Center blog between

https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://cnsrrwrpcnbg.blogspot.com/2022/07/fyujjjj.html

Personally, I am in between being begrudingly against (right) gay marriage and me being in between apolitical and mixed on gay marriage (left)

Personally, I oscillate between being between supporting individual persons, whether heterosexual/homosexual/lesbian who are cohabiting/single to be able to adopt children. Ideally, in conjunction with a country wide layout of It Takes a Village type systems for children of parents of all sexual orientations, as mentioned here and by Hillary Clinton (left) and apolitical to lean pragmatically Christian democratic on gay adoption (right) and me being between ambiguous and Third Way on gay adoption

am between passively against gay conversion threapy being legal (left) to me supporting gay conversion therapy being legal (right)

am between radically centrist (left) and supportive (right) on the Straight Pride Movement

am between being fine with (right) and triangulation (left)  on Cissexism

am between neutral and lean agree and agree on the viewpoint that transgender women should not be allowed to get cervical cancer screenings since they don't have those organs and that transgender men should be allowed to get cervical and breast cancer screenings.

am between being personally pro life (right) and me being personally pretty much Pro Choice (with the view that abortion should be rare ,safe and legal) but between deep down inside and subconsciously personally probably mixed to pro life (left) on first trimester abortion

Legality wise, I am between being Liberal-Conservative Populist with views that match Forza Italia 2013’s first trimester abortion views (while once in a blue moon temporarily oscillating to being lean pro choice/PLIABAN ie Pro Life in all but a name before going back to being pro life each time) (right) and me being pretty much pro choice (with the views that abortion should be rare, safe ,legal) but deep down inside and subconsciously legality wise probably being mixed to pro life (left) for first trimester abortion

Personally I am between pro life (right) and begrudingly pro choice (with the view that abortion should be rare safe and legal) (left) on second trimester abortion

Legality wise, I am between pragmatically pro life (except when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIABAN state, in which case, I am half heartingly pro choice) (right) and begrudingly pro choice (with the view that abortion should be rare safe and legal) (left) on second trimester abortion

am between Triangulation lean mixed (left) and support (right) on parental consent laws 

am between pragmatically lean support (left) and support (right) for the Hyde Amendment.

am between apolitical (left) to militantly moderate (with positive emotions and an eye for womens health) (right) on Texas's pro life laws (while being sympathetic to people who are against those laws). I am between somewhat against and against people criticizing Texas's pro life laws

am between pro life (right) and conditionally pro life (left) on whether women should be allowed to abort babies with Down Syndrome (for that reason)

am between pro life (right) and me being between neutral and lean conditionally support (left) on whether I believe that health care providers should be required to offer free birth control

Personally, I am between indifferent (right) and triangulation (left) on birth control

Legality wise I am between indifferent (right) and support (but rare safe legal) (left) for birth control being legal

am between having no issues with (left) and being supportive (right) of Josh Hawley's Men and the Future of America speech

am between being conditionally fine with Masculinity in at least some cases (if not most cases) (left) and me beleiving that in general there is nothing wrong with Masculinity.(right)

am between being empathatic to this letter (and thinking there might be some truth to it) (left) https://medium.com/@soumynona_/anonymous-letter-from-uc-berkeley-professor-in-response-to-black-lives-matter-protests-24a66a6f1ca7  and me echoing what the letter says. (right)

I am between empathizing (left) and somewhat sympathizing (right) with this view :  It would be great if blacks suddenly outnumber whites in the US etc and somehow get the power and position in the US from here on out that whites traditionally had while at the same time having whites be demoted and have the historical positions etc that blacks have had in the US in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s 1990s (ie blacks and whites switch places). 

I don't agree with that view however. It's just I am a fan of Trading Places type of movies /tv and can between empathize and somewhat sympathize with the above view.  

If blacks were ever in position to really switch places with whites as noted above (even through Anarchist methods), I'd be between pretty much empathizing with blacks and their allies trying to pull that off and me being beyond a reasonable doubt an Honorary True Companion mercenary in helping them pull it off but since we are nowhere near that point, I will continue to only be between empathizing and somewhat sympathizing with this view.  However my motive would be more wanting to shake things up as opposed to being a SJW.

am between against (right) and pragmatically compassionately against (left) Intersectionality but in a pragmatically compassionate way

am between strongly empathizing with (left) the type of views that Laura Kelly expressed in The Hill to me being against them (right). Here are the views https://thehill.com/policy/international/582894-gop-holds-on-biden-nominees-set-back-gains-for-women-in-top-positions   As long as they weren't replaced for bigoted reasons I hold my view above

am between being exactly like Mark Hatfield on the death penalty (right) and me being against the death penalty in nearly every case (left)

am between believing that former felons should not vote under most circumstances (right) and that they shouldn't be able to vote unless they prove that they are reformed (left)

am between being against the US going to war with the Philippines in the Philippine-American War and me supproting the Flilipinos in the Philippine-American War if i was alive back then (and me retroactively supporting them)   since imperialism is wrong

am between against seat belt laws for front seat and back seat passengers 15 and above (with preference for drivers who aren't wearing seat belts who get in accidents get penalized by their insurers not the police and me supporting primary seat belt laws for all passengers in the front and back seats under 15) and me supporting secondary seat belt laws for all passengers with me wanting less penalty for people who don't wear seat belts but at the same time, driving speeds reduced, roads made better to cause less accidents and better more safer automobiles to be made to balance that.

am between pragmatically not believe, lean pramatically not believe and mixed on whether I believe that the Climate Change Apocalypse type of climate change will happen.

I am between being more than pitifully,  cautiously somewhat supportive of Dr Oz's reaction to his wife not allowing their kids to be vaxxed years ago/Dr Oz’s views on the pandemic (right) and me condoning (but not necessarily agreeing with) Gene Simmons saying that non vaxxed are the enemy (left)

On the Spanish -American War, I am between neutral and this view: I would have initially supported the US going to war with Spain in the Spanish-American War if I was alive back then but near the end I would have at least somewhat turned against it.  In the present, I pragmatically lean being against the US going to war with Spain in the Spanish American War.  I am glad that the US won that war, but they really shouldn't have went to war with Spain since imperialism is wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

blog views

Parallel Right Mises Paleolibertarian , Left libertarian, Libertarian Party Anarchism